Bryan Pringle v. William Adams Jr et al

Filing 283

DECLARATION of Tal E. Dickstein in support of MOTION for Attorney Fees of all Defendants 280 filed by Defendants David Guetta, Frederick Riesterer, Shapiro Bernstein and Co. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15)(Miller, Donald)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Dean A. Dickie (appearing Pro Hac Vice) Dickie@MillerCanfield.com Kathleen E. Koppenhoefer (appearing Pro Hac Vice) Koppenhoefer@MillerCanfield.com Katharine N. Dunn (appearing Pro Hac Vice) Dunn@MillerCanfield.com MILLER, CANFIELD, PADDOCK AND STONE, P.L.C. 225 West Washington Street, Suite 2600 Chicago, IL 60606 Telephone: 312.460.4200 Facsimile: 312.460.4288 Ira Gould (appearing Pro Hac Vice) Gould@igouldlaw.corn Ryan L. Greely (appearing Pro Hac Vice) Rgreely@igouldlaw.com GOULD1_,AW GROUP 120 North LaSalle Street, Suite 2750 Chicago, IL 60602 Telephone: 312.781.0680 Facsimile: 312.726.1328 George L. Hampton IV (State Bar No. 144433) ghampton@hamptonholley.com Colin C. Holley (State Bar No. 191999) hamptonholley.com TONI-TOLLEY LLP 2101 East Coast Highway, Suite 260 Corona del Mar, California 92625 Telephone: 949.718.4550 Facsimile: 949.718.4580 ax1W Attorneys for Plaintiff BRYAN PRINGLE 18 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 SOUTHERN DIVISION 22 BRYAN PRINGLE, an individual, Plaintiff, 23 24 v. 25 WILLIAM ADAMS, JR.; STACY FERGUSON; ALLAN PINEDA; and 26 JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and collectively as the music group The Black 27 Eyed Peas, et al., 28 Defendants. Case No. SACV 10-1656 JST(RZx) PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT HEADPHONE JUNKIE PUBLISHING, LLC'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 1 PROPOUNDING Defendant HEADPHONE JUNKIE PUBLISHING, LLC 2 PARTY: 3 RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff BRYAN PRINGLE One 4 SET NO.: 5 6 7 Plaintiff Bryan Pringle ("Pringle" or "Plaintiff') submits these Amended Answers to Defendant Headphone Junkie Publishing, LLC's ("Headphone Junkie" or "Defendant") First Set of Interrogatories (the "Interrogatories"): 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. Pringle objects to each interrogatory insofar as it is vague, overly broad, not limited in time and scope, oppressive, harassing or vexatious, imposes burden or expense that outweighs the likely benefit, seeks legal conclusions, and/or seeks information not relevant to the lawsuit nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. 2. Pringle objects to the extent that these interrogatories seek information protected by the attorney/client or the work product privilege. Pringle will not provide any such privileged information. 3. The following answers are given based upon the information and documents of which Pringle's counsel is currently aware. Pringle's investigation continues and Pringle specifically reserves the right to supplement the following answers as this litigation proceeds. The following answers are given herein without prejudice to Pringle's right to supplement or change his answers or objections and to produce evidence of additional facts. 4. Pringle's answers are not an admission that any such information is relevant or admissible. 5. Pringle objects to each interrogatory, instruction or definition that purports to impose any obligation greater than or different from those required under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Orders of the Court. 28 2 1 expert, for the purpose of demonstrating how to use the ASR-10 2 keyboard. Plaintiff further states that he had telephonic and email 3 4 5 contact with Dave Gallant but does not recall the dates of such contact. INTERROGATORY NO. 24: Provide the date when Mr. Pringle allegedly 6 placed his musical equipment in the storage unit reflected in his police report 7 produced in this case. 8 9 ANSWER: Objection. Plaintiff objects to Interrogatory No. 24 because it is overly broad, unduly burdensome and not likely to lead to the 10 11 12 13 discovery of relevant evidence. Without waiving said objections, Plaintiff states that his music equipment was placed in the storage unit sometime during 2000 and prior to October 2000. Plaintiff does not 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 recall the specific date or dates on which his music equipment was placed in storage. INTERROGATORY NO. 25: If you contend that any Defendant has infringed any copyright of Plaintiff Bryan Pringle other than Take A Dive or Take A Dive (Dance Version), provide a complete factual basis for contending that they Defendant had access and that the accused work is substantially similar. ANSWER: Objection. Plaintiff objects to Interrogatory No. 25 because it is overly broad, unduly burdensome and not likely to lead to the discovery of relevant evidence. Without waiving said objections, at this particular time, Plaintiff states that David Guetta's song "Love is Gone" contains the guitar twang sequence of "Take a Dive" and as stated in his deposition, the Defendants may have infringed "If We Ever," "One Love," "Meet Me Halfway," "Someday," "Where Them Girls At," 28 18 1 "Best One Yet," "One More Chance," "Invisible," and "Showdown." 2 Investigation continues. 3 Dated: November 2, 2011 4 5 6 7 8 9 Dean A. Dickie (appearing Pro Hac Vice) Kathleen E. Koppenhoefer (appearing Pro Hac Vice) Katharine N. Dunn (appearing Pro Hac Vice MILLER, CANFIELD, PADDOCK AND STONE, P.L.C. Ira Gould (appearing Pro Hac Vice) Ryan L. Greely (appearing Pro Hac Vice) GOULD LAW GROUP George L. Hampton IV (State Bar No. 144433) Colin C. Holley (State Bar No. 191999) HAMPTONHOLLEY LLP 10 11 12 By: Attorneys for Plaintiff Bryan Pringle 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 VERIFICATION 1 2 3 4 5 I, Bryan Pringle, state that the answers made to Defendant Headphone Junkie Publishing, LLC's First Set of Interrogatories are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I declare the foregoing to be true under penalty of perjury. 6 7 Bryan P g 8 November 2, 2011 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 20

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?