Bryan Pringle v. William Adams Jr et al
Filing
82
Joint EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue The Hearing Date on Defendants' Rule 12 Motions from January 24, 2011 to January 31, 2011 IN ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE WITH HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION filed by Defendants Rister Editions, Shapiro Bernstein and Co. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Miller, Donald)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SOUTHERN DIVISION
11
12 BRYAN PRINGLE, an individual,
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
15 WILLIAM ADAMS, JR.; STACY
FERGUSON; ALLAN PINEDA; and
16 JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and
collectively as the music group The
17 Black Eyed Peas, et al.,
18
Defendants.
19
20
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. SACV 10-1656 JST (RZx)
Hon. Josephine Staton Tucker
Courtroom 10A
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ JOINT EX PARTE
APPLICATION TO CONTINUE
THE HEARING DATE ON
DEFENDANTS’ RULE 12
MOTIONS (FROM JANUARY 24
TO JANUARY 31) IN ORDER TO
CONSOLIDATE WITH HEARING
ON PLAINTIFF' MOTION FOR
S
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
(SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 31)
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LA2100172.1
213532-10005
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
EX PARTE APPLICATION
1
ORDER
2
Defendants’ JOINT EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE THE
3 HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANTS’ RULE 12 MOTIONS (FROM
4 JANUARY 24 TO JANUARY 31) IN ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE WITH
5 HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
6 (SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 31) has come before the Court. The Court has
7 considered the application and, for good cause shown,
8
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on Defendants’ Rule 12 Motions
9 is continued to January 31, 2011.
10
11
12 Dated: January __, 2011
13
Honorable Josephine Staton Tucker
United States District Court Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LA2100172.1
213532-10005
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
EX PARTE APPLICATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?