Bryan Pringle v. William Adams Jr et al

Filing 82

Joint EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue The Hearing Date on Defendants' Rule 12 Motions from January 24, 2011 to January 31, 2011 IN ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE WITH HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION filed by Defendants Rister Editions, Shapiro Bernstein and Co. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Miller, Donald)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SOUTHERN DIVISION 11 12 BRYAN PRINGLE, an individual, 13 14 Plaintiff, v. 15 WILLIAM ADAMS, JR.; STACY FERGUSON; ALLAN PINEDA; and 16 JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and collectively as the music group The 17 Black Eyed Peas, et al., 18 Defendants. 19 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. SACV 10-1656 JST (RZx) Hon. Josephine Staton Tucker Courtroom 10A [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ JOINT EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANTS’ RULE 12 MOTIONS (FROM JANUARY 24 TO JANUARY 31) IN ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE WITH HEARING ON PLAINTIFF' MOTION FOR S PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 31) 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LA2100172.1 213532-10005 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION 1 ORDER 2 Defendants’ JOINT EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE THE 3 HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANTS’ RULE 12 MOTIONS (FROM 4 JANUARY 24 TO JANUARY 31) IN ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE WITH 5 HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 6 (SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 31) has come before the Court. The Court has 7 considered the application and, for good cause shown, 8 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on Defendants’ Rule 12 Motions 9 is continued to January 31, 2011. 10 11 12 Dated: January __, 2011 13 Honorable Josephine Staton Tucker United States District Court Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LA2100172.1 213532-10005 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?