Nicholas Patrick v. J. Lizarraga

Filing 3

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL OF HABEAS PETITION AS UNEXHAUSTED AND/OR UNVERIFIED by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Nicholas Patrick ("petitioner") initiated this action on June 13, 2017, by filing a Petition for Writ of Habeas C orpus 1 by a Person in State Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ("2017 Petition" or "2017 Pet."). Accordingly, no later than July 14, 2017, petitioner is ordered to show cause why the 2017 Petition should not be dism issed as fully unexhausted and/or as unverified. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION) (Attachments: # 1 blank-notice of dismissal form, # 2 Declaration in Support of Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, # 3 Blank copies of pages 7 & 8- CV-69) (gr)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NUMBER Plaintiff(s), v. Defendant(s). NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a) or (c) PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: (Check one) G This action is dismissed by the Plaintiff(s) in its entirety. G The Counterclaim brought by Claimant(s) dismissed by Claimant(s) in its entirety. is G The Cross-Claim brought by Claimants(s) dismissed by the Claimant(s) in its entirety. is G The Third-party Claim brought by Claimant(s) dismissed by the Claimant(s) in its entirety. is G ONLY Defendant(s) is/are dismissed from (check one) G Complaint, G Counterclaim, G Cross-claim, G Third-Party Claim brought by . The dismissal is made pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 41(a) or (c). Date Signature of Attorney/Party NOTE: F.R.Civ.P. 41(a): This notice may be filed at any time before service by the adverse party of an answer or of a motion for summary judgment, whichever first occurs. F.R.Civ.P. 41(c): Counterclaims, cross-claims & third-party claims may be dismissed before service of a responsive pleading or prior to the beginning of trial. CV-09 (03/10) NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a) or (c)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?