Juarez v. City of Coalinga, et al.
Filing
23
ORDER Following In Camera Review of Plaintiff's Personnel File From Pleasant Valley State Prison; ORDER Directing Clerk to Copy Stipulation and Attach Hereto, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 8/26/2011. Further Order For In Camera Review: Date 9/27/11, Time 10:00 a.m., Ctrm 8 ~ 6th Floor. (Attachments: # 1 Stipulation doc. 15 ) (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ROBERTO JUAREZ,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CITY OF COALINGA, CHIEF CAL
)
MINOR, CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY
)
PATROL, CAPTAIN DANIEL MINOR, )
et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
1:11-cv-00733-LJO-SMS
ORDER FOLLOWING IN CAMERA
REVIEW OF PLAINTIFF’S
PERSONNEL FILE FROM PLEASANT
VALLEY STATE PRISON
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO COPY
STIPULATION AND ATTACH HERETO
(Doc. 15)
FURTHER ORDER FOR IN CAMERA
REVIEW:
18
Date: 9/27/11
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Ctrm: 8 ~ 6th Floor
19
20
Pursuant to this Court’s order for production of Plaintiff’s
21
peace officer personnel file for in camera review and disclosure to
22
defendants (Doc. 20), Ms. Tamara Jackson, Personnel Supervisor #1
23
from Pleasant Valley State Prison (“PVSP”), appeared as directed on
24
August 24, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. with a manila folder containing what
25
appeared to be, in the main, original documents from Plaintiff’s
26
personnel file.
27
that the Court erred with the order of August 8, 2011, by not
28
either attaching a copy of the Stipulation filed with the court on
It became immediately apparent to the undersigned
1
1
July 8, 2011 (Doc. 15), or by not signing the Stipulation as was
2
originally conceived by counsel or, further, by not being more
3
descriptive and/or thorough in describing all documents sought by
4
the order of August 8, 2011.
5
coordinator for PVSP took the Court literally at its word and
6
provided only the personnel file in which nothing regarding inmate
7
grievances, colleague/staff complaints or disputes, or professional
8
reprimands, etc., are kept.
9
documents other than those having to do with the training of,
10
hiring of, evaluation of job performance of, or miscellaneous
11
personal matters of the Plaintiff as “...associated records.”
12
In short, the custodian/litigation
The Stipulation characterizes such
Therefore, accepting responsibility for the incomplete
13
explanation in the Order of August 8, 2011, the Court hereby ORDERS
14
FURTHER PRODUCTION as follows:
15
16
1.
The litigation coordinator at PVSP shall copy and mail
to:
17
Anthony M. Sain, Esq.
Manning & Kass Ellrod Ramirez Trester, LLP
801 South Figueroa Street, 14th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
18
19
20
a copy of the nine (9) documents tabbed by this Court on August 24,
21
2011, for production.
22
Plaintiff’s counsel Douglas Hurt, as well as to defense counsel
23
Jill Scally, counsel for Defendants, California Highway Patrol and
24
Captain Daniel Minor.
25
2.
Mr. Sain shall, in turn, provide copies to
The Clerk shall copy the Stipulation (Doc. 15), and
26
attach it to this Order, allowing the litigation coordinator at
27
PVSP to read it in its entirety and comply with the letter and
28
spirit of it, specifically focusing on searching for any and all
2
1
documents relating to Plaintiff from internal affairs records
2
housed in the “ISU” Unit at the Prison, as well as any and all
3
documents referencing Officer Juarez kept in the normal course of
4
business in the Litigation Unit.
5
be paid to the language of the Stipulation on page -9-, lines 3-26.
6
3.
Further, specific attention shall
Production of documents pertaining hereto shall be
7
presented for in camera review on September 27, 2011 at 10:00 a.m.
8
in Courtroom No. 8 (instead of Ctrm. No. 7) on the Sixth Floor of
9
the Robert E. Coyle United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street,
10
Fresno, CA, 93721.
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
Dated:
icido3
August 26, 2011
/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?