Juarez v. City of Coalinga, et al.

Filing 23

ORDER Following In Camera Review of Plaintiff's Personnel File From Pleasant Valley State Prison; ORDER Directing Clerk to Copy Stipulation and Attach Hereto, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 8/26/2011. Further Order For In Camera Review: Date 9/27/11, Time 10:00 a.m., Ctrm 8 ~ 6th Floor. (Attachments: # 1 Stipulation doc. 15 ) (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ROBERTO JUAREZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CITY OF COALINGA, CHIEF CAL ) MINOR, CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY ) PATROL, CAPTAIN DANIEL MINOR, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 1:11-cv-00733-LJO-SMS ORDER FOLLOWING IN CAMERA REVIEW OF PLAINTIFF’S PERSONNEL FILE FROM PLEASANT VALLEY STATE PRISON ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO COPY STIPULATION AND ATTACH HERETO (Doc. 15) FURTHER ORDER FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW: 18 Date: 9/27/11 Time: 10:00 a.m. Ctrm: 8 ~ 6th Floor 19 20 Pursuant to this Court’s order for production of Plaintiff’s 21 peace officer personnel file for in camera review and disclosure to 22 defendants (Doc. 20), Ms. Tamara Jackson, Personnel Supervisor #1 23 from Pleasant Valley State Prison (“PVSP”), appeared as directed on 24 August 24, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. with a manila folder containing what 25 appeared to be, in the main, original documents from Plaintiff’s 26 personnel file. 27 that the Court erred with the order of August 8, 2011, by not 28 either attaching a copy of the Stipulation filed with the court on It became immediately apparent to the undersigned 1 1 July 8, 2011 (Doc. 15), or by not signing the Stipulation as was 2 originally conceived by counsel or, further, by not being more 3 descriptive and/or thorough in describing all documents sought by 4 the order of August 8, 2011. 5 coordinator for PVSP took the Court literally at its word and 6 provided only the personnel file in which nothing regarding inmate 7 grievances, colleague/staff complaints or disputes, or professional 8 reprimands, etc., are kept. 9 documents other than those having to do with the training of, 10 hiring of, evaluation of job performance of, or miscellaneous 11 personal matters of the Plaintiff as “...associated records.” 12 In short, the custodian/litigation The Stipulation characterizes such Therefore, accepting responsibility for the incomplete 13 explanation in the Order of August 8, 2011, the Court hereby ORDERS 14 FURTHER PRODUCTION as follows: 15 16 1. The litigation coordinator at PVSP shall copy and mail to: 17 Anthony M. Sain, Esq. Manning & Kass Ellrod Ramirez Trester, LLP 801 South Figueroa Street, 14th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 18 19 20 a copy of the nine (9) documents tabbed by this Court on August 24, 21 2011, for production. 22 Plaintiff’s counsel Douglas Hurt, as well as to defense counsel 23 Jill Scally, counsel for Defendants, California Highway Patrol and 24 Captain Daniel Minor. 25 2. Mr. Sain shall, in turn, provide copies to The Clerk shall copy the Stipulation (Doc. 15), and 26 attach it to this Order, allowing the litigation coordinator at 27 PVSP to read it in its entirety and comply with the letter and 28 spirit of it, specifically focusing on searching for any and all 2 1 documents relating to Plaintiff from internal affairs records 2 housed in the “ISU” Unit at the Prison, as well as any and all 3 documents referencing Officer Juarez kept in the normal course of 4 business in the Litigation Unit. 5 be paid to the language of the Stipulation on page -9-, lines 3-26. 6 3. Further, specific attention shall Production of documents pertaining hereto shall be 7 presented for in camera review on September 27, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. 8 in Courtroom No. 8 (instead of Ctrm. No. 7) on the Sixth Floor of 9 the Robert E. Coyle United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street, 10 Fresno, CA, 93721. 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 Dated: icido3 August 26, 2011 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?