Butler v. Wern, et al.
Filing
32
ORDER Directing Defendants to Consent to or Decline United States Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction within Fifteen Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/24/15. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form)(Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARQUES BUTLER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
R. WERN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO
CONSENT TO OR DECLINE UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION WITHIN
FIFTEEN DAYS
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On October 3, 2012, Plaintiff consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
19
20
Case No.: 1:12-cv-01538-SAB (PC)
Plaintiff Marques Butler is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
§ 636(c). (ECF No. 5.)
This action is proceeding against Defendants Wern, Stratton, and Montano for excessive force
21
22
and against Defendant Wern for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in violation of the
23
Eighth Amendment.1
On May 7, 2014, Defendants Stratton and Montano filed an answer to the complaint.2 (ECF
24
25
No. 17.) On May 8, 2014, the Court issued the discovery and scheduling order, setting the dispositive
26
27
28
1
Plaintiff also stated a cognizable claim against “John Doe 1” for excessive force and deliberate indifference. However,
this Doe defendant has not been identified or served.
1
1
motion deadline of March 19, 2015. (ECF No. 18.) To date, no dispositive motions have been filed,
2
and this case is now ready to proceed to trial.
3
The Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California now has the heaviest District Judge
4
caseload in the entire nation. While the Court will use its best efforts to resolve this case and all other
5
civil cases in a timely manner, the parties are admonished that not all of the parties’ needs and
6
expectations may be met as expeditiously as desired. As multiple trials are now being set to begin
7
upon the same date, parties may find their case trailing with little notice before the trial begins when
8
the case is heard before a United States District Judge. The law requires the Court give any criminal
9
case priority over civil trials and other matters, and the Court must proceed with criminal trials even if
10
a civil trial is older or was set earlier. Continuances of civil trials under these circumstances will no
11
longer be entertained, absent a specific and stated finding of good cause. If multiple trials are
12
scheduled to begin on the same day, this civil trial will trail day to day or week to week until
13
completion of any criminal case or older civil case.
14
The parties are advised of the availability of a United States Magistrate Judge to conduct all
15
proceedings in this action. A United States Magistrate Judge is available to conduct trials, including
16
entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73,
17
and Local Rule 305. The Court will direct the Clerk of the Court to provide Defendants with the
18
Court’s standard form to consent to or decline Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Within ten days of this
19
order’s date of service, Defendants shall either consent to or decline Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by
20
filling out the requisite forms and returning them to the Court. Defendants should take note of the
21
Court’s notice of expedited trial setting procedures set forth in the Court’s September 5, 2014, in
22
making their determination.
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
27
28
2
Defendant R. Wern has not been served as the summons was returned unexecuted on December 1, 2014. (ECF No. 28.)
In an order issued concurrently herewith, the Court has directed Plaintiff to show cause why Defendant Wern should not be
dismissed pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
2
1
Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
3
of the consent/decline form and the instructions for consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction; and
2.
4
5
The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to send Defendants Stratton and Montano a copy
Within fifteen (15) days from the date of service of this order, Defendants Stratton and
Montano shall complete and return the Consent or Request for Reassignment form.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated:
9
April 24, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?