Cruz v. Ahlin, et al.

Filing 26

SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO SEND PLAINTIFF A COPY OF LOCAL RULE 281(b),signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 02/14/17. (Expert Discovery due by 11/30/2017, Dispositive Motions filed by 12/15/2017, Jury Trial set for 1/2 3/2019 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill, Telephonic Discovery Status Conference set for 7/24/2017 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean, Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing set for 11/28/2018 at 08:15 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill) (Attachments: # 1 Local Rule 281(b))(Martin-Gill, S)

1
2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5

PETER CASEY CRUZ,

6

Plaintiff,

7
8

v.

9
10
11

JONATHAN HAMRICK,
Defendant.

12

CASE NO. 1:13-cv-00988-LJO-EPG (PC)
SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER
DIRECTING CLERK TO SEND PLAINTIFF
A COPY OF LOCAL RULE 281(b)
Telephonic Discovery
Status Conference:
July 24, 2017
Time: 2:00 p.m.
Courtroom 10 (EPG)
Non-Expert
Discovery Cut-off: September 11, 2017
Expert Disclosure
Deadline:

September 29, 2017

13
Rebuttal Expert
Disclosure Deadline: October 27, 2017

14
15

Expert Discovery
Cut-off:

17

November 30, 2017

Dispositive Motion
Filing Deadline:

16

December 15, 2017

18

20

Telephonic Trial
Confirmation Hearing: November 28, 2018
Time: 8:15 a.m.
Courtroom 4 (LJO)

21

Jury Trial:

19

22
23
24
25
26
27

January 23, 2019
Time: 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4 (LJO)

This Court conducted a scheduling conference on February 13, 2017. Plaintiff Peter Cruz
telephonically appeared on his own behalf. Counsel Peter Meshot personally appeared on behalf
of Defendant. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b), this Court now sets a schedule for this action.
I.

INITIAL DISCLOSURES
Plaintiff has until March 3, 2017, to serve his initial disclosures on Defendant. Defendant

28
1

1

has until March 3, 2017, to serve his supplemental initial disclosures on Plaintiff.

2

II.

DISCOVERY PROCEDURES

3

The parties are now granted leave to serve discovery in addition to that provided as part of

4

initial disclosures. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1, 16, and 26-36, discovery shall

5

proceed as follows:

6
7
8
9
10

1. Discovery requests shall be served by the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 5 and Local Rule 135. Discovery requests and responses shall not be filed
with the Court unless required by Local Rules 250.2, 250.3, or 250.4 (providing that
discovery requests shall not be filed unless or until there is a proceeding in which the
document or proof of service is at issue).

Each party is limited to serving 15

interrogatories, 15 requests for production of documents, and 10 requests for
11
admission. On motion, these limits may be increased for good cause.
12
13
14

2. Responses to written discovery requests shall be due forty-five (45) days after the
request is first served. Boilerplate objections are disfavored and may be summarily
overruled by the Court. Responses to document requests shall include all documents

15

within a party’s possession, custody or control. Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a)(1). Documents

16

are deemed within a party’s possession, custody, or control if the party has actual

17

possession, custody, or control thereof, or the legal right to obtain the property on

18

demand.1

19

3. If any party or third party withholds a document on the basis of privilege, they shall

20

provide a privilege log to the requesting party identifying the date, author, recipients,

21

general subject matter, and basis of the privilege within thirty (30) days after the date

22

that responses are due. Failure to provide a privilege log within this time shall result

23

in a waiver of the privilege. To the extent the requesting party disputes whether a

24

document is privileged, it can raise that issue to the Court's attention in its statement of

25

a discovery dispute to be discussed at the discovery conference (see below). If a party

26
1

27
28

Defendant’s responses should be consistent with their right to request documents pursuant to
California Government Code § 3306.5 (“Each employer shall keep each public safety officers’ personnel file or a true
and correct copy thereof, and shall make the file or copy thereof available within a reasonable period of time after a
request thereof by the officer.”).

2

1

or third party withholds a document on the basis of the official information privilege,

2

the requesting party may request that the Court conduct an in camera review of such

3

document so that the Court can balance the moving party's need for the documents in

4

the litigation against the reasons that are asserted in defending their confidentiality. In

5

any such request for in camera review, the party requesting review shall identify, with

6
7
8
9

specificity, the document(s) for which review is sought.
4. The parties are required to act in good faith during the course of discovery and the
failure to do so may result in the payment of expenses pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) or other appropriate sanctions authorized by the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules.

10
5. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2)(B), Defendant may depose
11
12
13
14

Plaintiff and any other witness confined in a prison upon condition that, at least
fourteen (14) days before such a deposition, Defendant serves all parties with the
notice required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(1). Plaintiff’s failure to
participate in a properly noticed deposition could result in sanctions against Plaintiff,

15

including monetary sanctions and/or dismissal of this case. Pursuant to Federal Rule

16

of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), the parties may take any deposition under this section by

17

video conference without a further motion or order of the Court. Due to security

18

concerns and institutional considerations not applicable to Defendant, Plaintiff must

19

seek leave from the Court to depose incarcerated witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule of

20

Civil Procedure 30(a)(2). Nothing herein forecloses a party from bringing a motion

21

for protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1) if necessary.

22

6. With the Court’s permission, Plaintiff may serve third party subpoenas, including on

23

the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and/or the Office of the

24
25
26
27

Inspector General if Plaintiff seeks documents from them and the entities are not
presently defendants in this case. To issue a subpoena on these entities, or any other
third parties, Plaintiff must file a request for the issuance of a subpoena duces tecum
with the Court. If the Court approves the request, it may issue Plaintiff a subpoena
duces tecum, commanding the production of documents from a non-party, and may

28
3

1

command service of the subpoena by the United States Marshal Service. Fed. R. Civ.

2

P. 45; 28 U.S.C. 1915(d). However, the Court will consider granting such a request

3

only if the documents sought from the non-party are not equally available to Plaintiff

4

and are not obtainable from Defendant through a request for production of documents.

5

Fed. R. Civ. P. 34. In any request for a subpoena, Plaintiff must: (1) identify with
specificity the documents sought and from whom, and (2) make a showing in the

6

request that the records are only obtainable through that third party. The documents

7

requested must also fall within the scope of discovery allowed in this action. See Fed.

8

R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1).

9

7. A discovery conference has been set for July 24, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. Parties have
10
leave to appear by phone. To join the conference, each party is directed to call the
11

toll-free number (888) 251−2909 and use Access Code 1024453. Two weeks before

12

the discovery conference, the parties may file a motion to compel further discovery

13

responses. One week before the discovery conference, the responding party may file a

14

response to the motion to compel. The motion should include a copy of the request(s)

15

and any response to the request(s) at issue. Unless there is a need for discovery prior

16

to the discovery conference, motions to compel will not be considered until the

17

discovery conference. Motions to compel will not be permitted after the discovery

18

conference absent good cause. The parties should be prepared to address all discovery

19

disputes at the discovery conference.

20

III.

EXPERT DISCLOSURES

21

The deadline for all parties to serve their expert disclosures is September 29, 2017.

22

Parties have until October 27, 2017, to serve their rebuttal expert disclosures. The deadline for

23

the completion of all expert discovery is November 30, 2017.

24

IV.

The deadline for the completion of all non-expert discovery is September 11, 2017. All

25
26
27
28

DISCOVERY DEADLINE

discovery must be provided by this date, including discovery compelled following the discovery
conference.
V.

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS DEADLINE
4

1

The deadline for filing all dispositive motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 is December

2

15, 2017.

3

VI.

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
No settlement conference has been scheduled.

4

The Court will revisit the issue of

5

scheduling a settlement conference at the discovery conference on July 24, 2017.

6

VII.

7
8
9
10
11

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION
Plaintiff has declined the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

636(c). (ECF No. 5).
VIII. TELEPHONIC TRIAL CONFIRMATION HEARING
The Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing is set for November 28, 2018, at 8:15 a.m.,
in Courtroom 4, before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill. The parties may appear by telephone
by arranging a one line conference call and telephoning the Court at [phone].

12
In addition to the matters already required to be addressed in the pretrial statement in
13
14
15
16
17

accordance with Local Rule 281, Plaintiff will be required to make a particularized showing in
order to obtain the attendance of witnesses. The procedures and requirements for making such a
showing are outlined in detail below.

Plaintiff is advised that failure to comply with the

procedures set forth below may result in the preclusion of any or all witnesses named in his
pretrial statement.

18

At the trial of this case, Plaintiff must be prepared to introduce evidence to prove each of

19

the alleged facts that support the claims raised in the lawsuit. In general, there are two kinds of

20

trial evidence: (1) exhibits and (2) the testimony of witnesses. It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to

21

produce all of the evidence to prove his case, whether that evidence is in the form of exhibits or

22

witness testimony.

23

procedures to ensure that the witnesses will be at the trial and available to testify.

24
25
26
27
28

1.

If Plaintiff wants to call witnesses to testify, he must follow certain

Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to

Testify Voluntarily - An incarcerated witness who agrees voluntarily to attend trial to give
testimony cannot come to court unless this Court orders the warden or other custodian to permit
the witness to be transported to court. This Court will not issue such an order unless it is satisfied
that: (a) the prospective witness is willing to attend; and (b) the prospective witness has actual
5

1

knowledge of relevant facts.

2

A party intending to introduce the testimony of incarcerated witnesses who have agreed

3

voluntarily to attend the trial must serve and file concurrent with the pretrial statement a written

4

motion for a court order requiring that such witnesses be brought to court at the time of trial. The

5

motion must: (1) state the name, address, and prison identification number of each such witness;

6
7
8
9

and (2) be accompanied by declarations showing that each witness is willing to testify and that
each witness has actual knowledge of relevant facts. The motion should be entitled “A Motion
for Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses.”
The willingness of the prospective witness can be shown in one of two ways: (1) the party
himself can swear by declaration under penalty of perjury that the prospective witness has

10
informed the party that he or she is willing to testify voluntarily without being subpoenaed, in
11
12
13
14

which declaration the party must state when and where the prospective witness informed the party
of this willingness; or (2) the party can serve and file a declaration, signed under penalty of
perjury by the prospective witness, in which the witness states that he or she is willing to testify
without being subpoenaed.

15

The prospective witness’s actual knowledge of relevant facts can be shown in one of two

16

ways: (1) if the party has actual firsthand knowledge that the prospective witness was an

17

eyewitness or an ear-witness to the relevant facts (i.e., if an incident occurred in plaintiff’s cell

18

and, at the time, plaintiff saw that a cellmate was present and observed the incident, plaintiff may

19

swear to the cellmate’s ability to testify), the party himself can swear by declaration under penalty

20

of perjury that the prospective witness has actual knowledge; or (2) the party can serve and file a

21

declaration signed under penalty of perjury by the prospective witness in which the witness

22

describes the relevant facts to which the prospective witness was an eye- or ear witness. Whether

23

the declaration is made by the party or by the prospective witness, it must be specific about the

24
25
26
27

incident, when and where it occurred, who was present, and how the prospective witness
happened to be in a position to see or to hear what occurred at the time it occurred.
The Court will review and rule on the motion for attendance of incarcerated witnesses,
specifying which prospective witnesses must be brought to Court. Subsequently, the Court will
issue the order necessary to cause the witness’s custodian to bring the witness to Court.

28
6

1
2
3

Motions for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses, if any, must be filed on or before
September 28, 2018. Oppositions, if any, must be filed on or before October 26, 2018.
2.

Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses Who Refuse to

4

Testify Voluntarily - If a party seeks to obtain the attendance of incarcerated witnesses who

5

refuse to testify voluntarily, the party should submit with his pretrial statement a motion for the

6
7
8
9

attendance of such witnesses. Such motion should be in the form described above. In addition,
the party must indicate in the motion that the incarcerated witnesses are not willing to testify
voluntarily.
3.

Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Unincarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to

Testify Voluntarily - It is the responsibility of the party who has secured an unincarcerated
10
witness’s voluntary attendance to notify the witness of the time and date of trial. No action need
11
12
13
14

be sought or obtained from the Court.
4.

Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Unincarcerated Witnesses Who Refuse to

Testify Voluntarily - If a prospective witness is not incarcerated, and he or she refuses to testify
voluntarily, the witness must be served with a subpoena. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45. In addition, the

15

party seeking the witness’s presence must tender an appropriate sum of money for the witness.

16

Id. In the case of an unincarcerated witness, the appropriate sum of money is the daily witness

17

fee of $40.00 plus the witness’s travel expenses. 28 U.S.C. § 1821.

18

If Plaintiff wishes to obtain the attendance of one or more unincarcerated witnesses who

19

refuse to testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must first notify the Court in writing of the name and

20

location of each unincarcerated witness. The Court will calculate the travel expense for each

21

unincarcerated witness and notify Plaintiff of the amount(s). Plaintiff must then, for each witness,

22

submit a money order made payable to the witness for the full amount of the witness’s travel

23

expenses plus the daily witness fee of $40.00. The subpoena will not be served upon the

24
25
26
27

unincarcerated witness by the United States Marshal unless the money order is tendered to the
Court. Because no statute authorizes the use of public funds for these expenses in civil cases, the
tendering of witness fees and travel expenses is required even if the party was granted leave to
proceed in forma pauperis.
If Plaintiff wishes to have the Marshal serve any unincarcerated witnesses who refuse to

28
7

1

testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must submit the money orders to the Court no later than October 26,

2

2018. In order to ensure timely submission of the money orders, Plaintiff must notify the Court

3

of the names and locations of his witnesses, in compliance with step 4 above, no later than

4

September 28, 2018.
Plaintiff shall file and serve a pretrial statement as described in this order on or before

5
6
7

September 28, 2018. Defendant shall file and serve a pretrial statement as described in this order
on or before October 26, 2018.
The parties are advised that failure to file pretrial statements as required by this order may

8
9

result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, which may include dismissal of the action or
entry of default.

10
The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a copy of Local Rule 281(b).
11

IX.

12
13
14

TRIAL DATE
A 1-3 day jury trial is set for January 23, 2019, at 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom 4, before

Chief Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill.
X.

EFFECT OF THIS ORDER

15

This order represents the Court and the parties’ best estimated schedule to complete this

16

case. Any party unable to comply with the dates outlined in this order shall immediately file an

17

appropriate motion or stipulation identifying the requested modification(s).

18

The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a

19

showing of good cause, even if a stipulation to modify is filed. Due to the impacted nature of the

20

civil case docket, this Court disfavors requests to modify established dates.

21

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

February 14, 2017

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28
8