Simpson v. State Attorney General of California et al

Filing 7

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/4/2013 disregarding 3 Motion to Proceed IFP and ordering Plaintiff to submit a signed Application for IFP or pay filing fee. (Motion for IFP due by 12/9/2013). (Attachments: # 1 IFP Application)(Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EARL SIMPSON, 12 13 14 15 1:13-cv-01701-JLT (PC) Plaintiff, v. STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 16 ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE WITHIN 30 DAYS (Doc. 3) 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. ' 1983, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 20 ' 1915. However, plaintiff=s application to proceed in forma pauperis was deficient in that it did 21 not include plaintiff's required original signature. Each document submitted for filing must 22 include the original signature of the filing party or parties. Local Rule 131; F.R.C.P. 11(a). 23 Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 24 1. Plaintiff's unsigned motion to proceed in forma pauperis, filed October 23, 2013 25 (Doc. 3), is disregarded. Within 30 days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff SHALL re- 26 submit the enclosed application to proceed in forma pauperis, bearing plaintiff's original 27 signature, or in the alternative, pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action. 28 1 1 Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action. 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 4, 2013 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?