Garcia v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Filing
14
ORDER GRANTING 13 Motion to Vacate Judgment ; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to VACATE the Judgment, Reopen Action and Provide Plaintiff with a copy of the Court's Screening Order Dated January 6, 2015, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 04/03/2015. (30-Day Deadline) (Attachments: # 1 Order, dated 01/06/2015) (Martin-Gill, S)
Case 1:14-cv-00459-BAM Document 10 Filed 01/06/15 Page 1 of 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JESUS A. GARCIA,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:14-cv-00459-BAM (PC)
SCREENING ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED
COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
(ECF No. 9.)
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
17
18
I.
19
Plaintiff Jesus A. Garcia (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
Screening Requirement and Standard
20
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 14, 2014, the Court
21
dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend. Following an extension of time, Plaintiff’s first
22
amended complaint, filed on December 3, 2014, is currently before the Court for screening.
23
The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a
24
governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. §
25
1915A(a). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or
26
malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or if it seeks monetary relief
27
from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2); 28 U.S.C. §
28
1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
1
Case 1:14-cv-00459-BAM Document 10 Filed 01/06/15 Page 2 of 7
1
A complaint must contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is
2
entitled to relief. . . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). Detailed factual allegations are not required, but
3
“[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements,
4
do not suffice.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009) (citing Bell
5
Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 1964-65 (2007)). While a plaintiff’s
6
allegations are taken as true, courts “are not required to indulge unwarranted inferences.” Doe I v.
7
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 572 F.3d 677, 681 (9th Cir. 2009) (internal quotation marks and citation
8
omitted).
9
To survive screening, Plaintiff’s claims must be facially plausible, which requires sufficient
10
factual detail to allow the Court to reasonably infer that each named defendant is liable for the
11
misconduct alleged. Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678, 129 S.Ct. at 1949 (quotation marks omitted); Moss v.
12
United States Secret Service, 572 F.3d 962, 969 (9th Cir. 2009). The sheer possibility that a defendant
13
acted unlawfully is not sufficient, and mere consistency with liability falls short of satisfying the
14
plausibility standard. Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678, 129 S.Ct. at 1949 (quotation marks omitted); Moss, 572
15
F.3d at 969.
Plaintiff’s Allegations
16
II.
17
Plaintiff is currently housed at Valley State Prison. Plaintiff names the following defendants:
18
(1) Jeffrey Beard, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections; (2) J. Mejia, Classification
19
Staff Representative (“CSR”); (3) J. Faure, Correctional Counselor; (4) Ron Davis, Warden at Avenal
20
State Prison; and (5) Does 1-50.
21
Plaintiff alleges as follows: In 2009, Plaintiff was sentenced to state prison and sent to the
22
Delano Reception Center. While at Delano, Plaintiff informed prison officials that he had asthma.
23
Plaintiff later saw a correctional counselor, who had the opportunity to review the note in Plaintiff’s
24
central file that he had asthma. Plaintiff was sent to Avenal State Prion by Defendant CSR Mejia.
25
Plaintiff alleges that it is the CSR’s duty to ensure that inmates fit the classification status necessary to
26
be transferred to a certain prison. Plaintiff contends that it was Defendant Mejia’s duty to ensure that
27
Plaintiff was sent to a prison that did not have a disease that could endanger his health.
28
2
Case 1:14-cv-00459-BAM Document 10 Filed 01/06/15 Page 3 of 7
1
Plaintiff further alleges that Avenal State Prison is known for having a fungus called
2
coccidioidomycosis (“Valley Fever”), which is highly endemic to both Valley State Prison and Avenal
3
State Prison. Plaintiff contends that CDCR officials have been notified of the risk of contracting
4
Valley Fever.
5
Plaintiff asserts that he arrived at Avenal State Prison unaware that his life was endangered by
6
Valley Fever and that the chance of contracting the infection was increased because of his asthma.
7
Plaintiff alleges that it was the duty of Avenal State Prison’s Warden to ensure that Plaintiff’s safety
8
was secure. After Plaintiff was cleared to program at Avenal State Prison, he began to experience flu-
9
like symptoms, which are a strong indicator of Valley Fever. The symptoms worsened in 2010, but
10
11
doctors at Avenal State Prison informed Plaintiff that they believed he had a common cold.
Plaintiff was paroled from Avenal State Prison on January 5, 2012, without having been tested
12
for Valley Fever. Once paroled, Plaintiff became very sick, with fever, chills, body aches and
13
headaches. Plaintiff sought treatment at a clinic where a physician ordered chest x-rays. The
14
physician indicated that the x-rays presented as a person with bronchitis and that Plaintiff had
15
pneumonia. Plaintiff informed the physician that he had asthma and that he had paroled from Avenal
16
State Prison two weeks earlier. Plaintiff also indicated that they had Valley Fever at Avenal State
17
Prison. The physician gave plaintiff a shot and a prescription.
18
About 12 months after being released from prison, Plaintiff began to break out with small spots
19
around his ankles and top of his feet. Eighteen months after being released, Plaintiff was
20
reincarcerated. While being detained in the county jail, the spots began to worsen. When finally sent
21
to prison, Plaintiff spots worsened and he broke out in bumps. Plaintiff’s shins became swollen and
22
his feet began to peel. Doctors began to prescribe creams which made it worse. Plaintiff asked to be
23
tested for Valley Fever. Without being told the results, Plaintiff was prescribed Diflucanate and
24
antibiotics. Upon his second refill for Diflucanate, Plaintiff asked the nurse what it was prescribed for
25
and for its side effects. The nurse came back with Valley Fever written on Plaintiff’s medication bag.
26
Plaintiff asked if he had Valley Fever, but the nurse told him to ask his doctor.
27
28
When Plaintiff saw a doctor, he asked about his lab results. The doctor verified that Plaintiff
had Valley Fever. Plaintiff took Diflucanate for 9 months, which caused him constipation,
3
Case 1:14-cv-00459-BAM Document 10 Filed 01/06/15 Page 4 of 7
1
dehydration, blurred vision, headaches, dizziness, disorientation, muscle weakness, fatigue, anxiety
2
stress, and weight loss.
3
Plaintiff further alleges that Defendant Jeffry Beard was responsible for the safety and security
4
of all inmates under the care of CDCR. Plaintiff contends that Defendant Beard deliberately allowed
5
officials to subject Plaintiff to cruel and unusual punishment by allowing him to be housed in a prison
6
where Valley Fever is highly endemic.
7
Plaintiff seeks compensatory and punitive damages.
8
III.
9
Discussion
A. Linkage Requirement
10
The Civil Rights Act under which this action was filed provides:
11
Every person who, under color of [state law] ... subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen
of the United States ... to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the
Constitution ... shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other
proper proceeding for redress.
12
13
14
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The statute plainly requires that there be an actual connection or link between the
15
actions of the defendants and the deprivation alleged to have been suffered by Plaintiff. See Monell v.
16
Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978); Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S.
17
362, 96 S.Ct. 598, 46 L.Ed.2d 561 (1976). The Ninth Circuit has held that “[a] person ‘subjects’
18
another to the deprivation of a constitutional right, within the meaning of section 1983, if he does an
19
affirmative act, participates in another’s affirmative acts, or omits to perform an act which he is legally
20
required to do that causes the deprivation of which complaint is made.” Johnson v. Duffy, 588 F.2d
21
740, 743 (9th Cir. 1978).
22
Here, Plaintiff fails to J. Faure and the Doe Defendants to any constitutional violation.
23
Plaintiff will be given leave to cure this deficiency. If Plaintiff elects to amend his complaint, he must
24
allege what each individual defendant did or did not do that resulted in a violation of his rights.
25
26
27
B. Doe Defendants
“As a general rule, the use of ‘John Doe’ to identify a defendant is not favored.” Gillespie v.
Civiletti, 629 F.2d 637, 642 (9th Cir. 1980). Plaintiff is advised that John Doe defendants (i.e.,
28
4
Case 1:14-cv-00459-BAM Document 10 Filed 01/06/15 Page 5 of 7
1
unknown defendants) cannot be served by the United States Marshal until Plaintiff has identified them
2
as actual individuals and amended his complaint to substitute names for the John Does.
C. Deliberate Indifference/Cruel and Unusual Punishment
3
4
To constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment, prison
5
conditions must involve “the wanton and unnecessary infliction of pain.” Rhodes v. Chapman, 452
6
U.S. 337, 347 (1981). A prisoner’s claim does not rise to the level of an Eighth Amendment violation
7
unless (1) “the prison official deprived the prisoner of the “minimal civilized measure of life’s
8
necessities,” and (2) “the prison official ‘acted with deliberate indifference in doing so.’” Toguchi v.
9
Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1057 (9th Cir. 2004) (quoting Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 744 (9th Cir.
10
2002) (citation omitted)). In order to find a prison official liable under the Eighth Amendment for
11
denying humane conditions of confinement within a prison, the official must know “that inmates face
12
a substantial risk of serious harm and disregard [ ] that risk by failing to take reasonable measures to
13
abate it.” Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 847 (1994).
14
Defendant Jeffrey Beard
15
Plaintiff fails to state a cognizable claim against Defendant Beard for deliberate indifference to
16
Plaintiff’s health and safety. There are no allegations linking Defendant Beard to Plaintiff’s housing
17
assignment at Avenal State Prison. There also are no allegations that Defendant Beard knew of
18
Plaintiff’s asthma or, more importantly, that Plaintiff contracted Valley Fever while housed at Avenal
19
State Prison.
20
Defendant J. Mejia
21
Plaintiff has not stated a cognizable claim against Defendant J. Mejia arising out of Plaintiff’s
22
assignment to Avenal State Prison. There are no allegations indicating that Defendant Mejia knew
23
that Avenal State Prison was in an endemic area or that Plaintiff was at risk of contracting Valley
24
Fever. There also are no allegations indicating that Plaintiff contracted Valley Fever while housed at
25
Avenal State Prison.
26
Ron Davis
27
Plaintiff has not stated a cognizable claim against Defendant Davis for deliberate indifference
28
to Plaintiff’s health and safety. There are no allegations indicating that Defendant Davis knew that
5
Case 1:14-cv-00459-BAM Document 10 Filed 01/06/15 Page 6 of 7
1
Plaintiff had asthma or was at risk to contract Valley Fever. Additionally, there are no allegations
2
indicating that Plaintiff contracted Valley Fever while housed at Avenal State Prison.
3
D. Deliberate Indifference to Serious Medical Needs
4
“[T]o maintain an Eighth Amendment claim based on prison medical treatment, an inmate
5
must show ‘deliberate indifference to serious medical needs.’” Jett v. Penner, 439 F.3d 1091, 1096
6
(9th Cir .2006) (quoting Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104, 97 S.Ct. 285, 291, 50 L.Ed.2d 251
7
(1976)). The two part test for deliberate indifference requires the plaintiff to show (1) “a ‘serious
8
medical need’ by demonstrating that failure to treat a prisoner’s condition could result in further
9
significant injury or the ‘unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain,’” and (2) “the defendant's
10
response to the need was deliberately indifferent.” Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096; Wilhelm v. Rotman, 680
11
F.3d 1113, 1122 (9th Cir. 2012).
12
Deliberate indifference is shown where the official is aware of a serious medical need and fails
13
to adequately respond. Simmons v. Navajo County, Ariz., 609 F.3d 1011, 1018 (9th Cir. 2010).
14
“Deliberate indifference is a high legal standard.” Id. at 1019; Toguchi, 391 F.3d at 1060. The prison
15
official must be aware of facts from which he could make an inference that “a substantial risk of
16
serious harm exists” and he must make the inference. Farmer, 511 U.S. at 837.
17
Although Plaintiff complains of inadequate medical care, he does not provide sufficient factual
18
allegations to state a cognizable claim for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against any
19
individual defendant. He merely lumps all medical staff together. Plaintiff will be given leave to cure
20
this deficiency.
21
IV.
Conclusion and Order
22
Plaintiff has failed to state a cognizable claim against any individual defendant. The Court will
23
grant Plaintiff a final opportunity to cure the identified deficiencies. Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122,
24
1130 (9th Cir. 2000).
25
Plaintiff’s amended complaint should be brief, Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a), but it must state what each
26
named defendant did that led to the deprivation of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights, Iqbal, 556 U.S. at
27
678-79, 129 S.Ct. at 1948-49. Although accepted as true, the “[f]actual allegations must be
28
6
Case 1:14-cv-00459-BAM Document 10 Filed 01/06/15 Page 7 of 7
1
[sufficient] to raise a right to relief above the speculative level . . . .” Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555
2
(citations omitted).
3
Additionally, Plaintiff may not change the nature of this suit by adding new, unrelated claims
4
in his first amended complaint. George v. Smith, 507 F.3d 605, 607 (7th Cir. 2007) (no “buckshot”
5
complaints).
6
Finally, Plaintiff is advised that an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint.
7
Lacey v. Maricopa County, 693 F.3d 896, 927 (9th Cir. 2012). Therefore, Plaintiff’s amended
8
complaint must be “complete in itself without reference to the prior or superseded pleading.” Local
9
Rule 220.
10
Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
11
1.
The Clerk’s Office shall send Plaintiff a complaint form;
12
2.
Plaintiff’s first amended complaint is dismissed with leave to amend;
13
3.
Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file a
14
15
16
second amended complaint; and
4.
If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint in compliance with this order, this
action will be dismissed for failure to obey a court order and failure to state a claim.
17
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
January 6, 2015
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
Case 1:14-cv-00459-BAM Document 10-1 Filed 01/06/15 Page 1 of 5
Plaintiff’s Name____________________________
Inmate No.________________________________
Address __________________________________
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
(Name of Plaintiff)
vs.
AMENDED CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT UNDER:
42 U.S.C. 1983 (State Prisoner)
Bivens Action [403 U.S. 388 (1971)] (Federal Prisoner)
________________________________________
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
(Names of all Defendants)
(Case Number)
I. Previous Lawsuits (list all other previous or pending lawsuits on additional page):
A. Have you brought any other lawsuits while a prisoner? Yes____ No____
B. If your answer to A is yes, how many? _________
Describe previous or pending lawsuits in the space below. (If more than one, attach additional page to continue
outlining all lawsuits in same format.)
1. Parties to this previous lawsuit:
Plaintiff _______________________________________________________________________
Defendants ____________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
2. Court (if Federal Court, give name of District; if State Court, give name of County)
_________________________________________________________________________________
3. Docket Number _____________________ 4. Assigned Judge _________________________
5. Disposition (Was the case dismissed? Appealed? Is it still pending?)
_________________________________________________________________________________
Case 1:14-cv-00459-BAM Document 10-1 Filed 01/06/15 Page 2 of 5
6. Filing Date (approx.) _________________ 7. Disposition Date (approx.) ________________
II. Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies
NOTICE: Pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, A[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions
under [42 U.S.C. ' 1983], or any other Federal law, by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such
administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.@ 42 U.S.C. ' 1997e(a). Prior to filing suit, inmates are required to exhaust
the available administrative remedy process, Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 211, 127 S.Ct. 910, 918‐19 (2007); McKinney v. Carey, 311
F.3d 1198, 1999 (9th Cir. 2002), and neither futility nor the unavailability of money damages will excuse the failure to exhaust, Porter
v. Nussle, 534 U.S. 516, 524, 122 S.Ct. 983, 988 (2002). If the court determines that an inmate failed to exhaust prior to filing suit,
the unexhausted claims will be dismissed, without prejudice. Jones, 549 U.S. at 223‐24, 127 S.Ct. at 925‐26.
A. Is there an inmate appeal or administrative remedy process available at your institution?
Yes_______ No______
B. Have you filed an appeal or grievance concerning ALL of the facts contained in this complaint?
Yes______ No______
C. Is the process completed?
Yes______
If your answer is yes, briefly explain what happened at each level.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
No______
If your answer is no, explain why not.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
III. Defendants
List each defendant’s full name, official position, and place of employment and address in the spaces below. If you need additional
space please provide the same information for any additional defendants on separate sheet of paper.
A. Name _________________________________ is employed as ______________________________________________
Current Address/Place of Employment ___________________________________________________________________
Case 1:14-cv-00459-BAM Document 10-1 Filed 01/06/15 Page 3 of 5
B. Name _________________________________ is employed as _______________________________________________
Current Address/Place of Employment ___________________________________________________________________
C. Name _________________________________ is employed as _______________________________________________
Current Address/Place of Employment ___________________________________________________________________
D. Name ________________________________ is employed as ________________________________________________
Current Address/Place of Employment ___________________________________________________________________
E. Name ________________________________ is employed as ________________________________________________
Current Address/Place of Employment ___________________________________________________________________
IV. Causes of Action (You may attach additional pages alleging other causes of action and the facts supporting them if necessary.
Must be in same format outlined below.)
Claim 1: The following civil right has been violated (e.g. right to medical care, access to courts, due process, free speech, freedom of
religion, freedom of association, freedom from cruel and unusual punishment, etc.):
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Supporting Facts (Include all facts you consider important to Claim 1. State what happened clearly and in your own words. You need
not cite legal authority or argument. Be certain to describe exactly what each defendant, by name, did to violate the right alleged in
Claim 1.):
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Case 1:14-cv-00459-BAM Document 10-1 Filed 01/06/15 Page 4 of 5
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Claim 2: The following civil right has been violated (e.g. right to medical care, access to courts, due process, free speech, freedom of
religion, freedom of association, freedom from cruel and unusual punishment, etc.):
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Supporting Facts (Include all facts you consider important to Claim 2. State what happened clearly and in your own words. You need
not cite legal authority or argument. Be certain to describe exactly what each defendant, by name, did to violate the right alleged in
Claim 2.):
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Case 1:14-cv-00459-BAM Document 10-1 Filed 01/06/15 Page 5 of 5
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
V. Relief
State briefly exactly what you want the court to do for you. Make no legal arguments. Cite no cases or statues.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Date: ___________________ Signature of Plaintiff: _______________________________________________
(Revised 4/4/14)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?