Philpott v. King et al
Filing
7
ORDER to Submit a New Non-Prisoner Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or Pay the $400.00 Filing Fee Within Thirty (30) Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/20/2014. (Attachments: # 1 IFP Application). (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
1:14-cv-01766-GSA (PC)
STEVEN PHILPOTT,
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SUBMIT A NEW
NON-PRISONER APPLICATION
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
OR PAY THE $400.00 FILING FEE
WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
v.
AUDREY KING, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
19
' 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code ' 6600 et seq.
20
are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act.
21
Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000).
22
Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on October 6, 2014, together with an
23
application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915. (Docs. 1, 2.) However,
24
Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis was not submitted on the form used by this
25
court. Plaintiff shall be granted time to complete the proper form and return it to the court.
26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
1.
28
The Clerk=s Office shall send to plaintiff a form for application to proceed in forma
pauperis for a non-prisoner; and
1
2.
1
2
3
Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall submit the
completed and signed application to proceed in forma pauperis for a non-prisoner, or in the
alternative, pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action. Failure to comply with this order will
result in dismissal of this action.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
November 20, 2014
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?