Acosta v. King et al
Filing
8
ORDER To Submit A Non-Prisoner Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperis Or Pay The $400.00 Filing Fee Within Thirty Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/8/2014.( Motion for IFP due by 1/12/2015) (Attachments: # 1 IFP Application Non-Prisoner Form)(Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
RICHARD ACOSTA,
10
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
13
AUDREY KING, et al.,
Defendants.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:14-cv-01925-BAM
ORDER TO SUBMIT A NON-PRISONER
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS OR PAY THE $400.00 FILING
FEE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
15
Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
16
§ 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq.
17
are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act.
18
Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000).
19
Plaintiff initiated this action on October 14, 2014, and the matter was transferred to this
20
Court on December 4, 2014. Plaintiff has neither paid the $400.00 filing fee nor submitted an
21
application to proceed in forma pauperis on the appropriate form pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915.
22
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
23
1. The Clerk’s Office shall send to plaintiff an application to proceed in forma pauperis
24
for a non-prisoner;
25
2. Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall submit the
26
completed and signed application to proceed in forma pauperis for a non-prisoner, or in the
27
alternative, pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action; and
28
///
1
1
3.
Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action.
2
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
December 8, 2014
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?