Kurbegovich v. On Habeas Corpus

Filing 4

ORDER OF TRANSFER. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 04/06/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2015) [Transferred from cand on 4/8/2015.]

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 No C-15-1348 TEH (PR) MUHAREM KURBEGOVICH, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER OF TRANSFER 13 14 v. UNKNOWN POLITICIANS, 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 18 While filed as a habeas petition, a review of the filing 19 indicates that Plaintiff is challenging the conditions of 20 confinement. 21 petition it would still be transferred as Plaintiff was found guilty 22 in 1980 in Los Angeles which is located in the Central District of 23 California. 24 Even if the Court were to review this case as a habeas Plaintiff, a state prisoner currently incarcerated at 25 California State Prison - Corcoran, has filed a pro se civil rights 26 Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that his mail privileges 27 have been restricted which has unfairly affected his sentence. 28 California State Prison - Corcoran is located in Kings County, 1 which lies in the Eastern District of California. 2 or omissions giving rise to Plaintiff’s claims occurred in the 3 Eastern District of California. 4 therefore properly lies in the Eastern District. 5 1391(b). 6 Thus, the events See 28 U.S.C. § 84(b). Venue See 28 U.S.C. § Accordingly, in the interest of justice and pursuant to 28 7 U.S.C. § 1406(a), this action is transferred to the United States 8 District Court for the Eastern District of California. 9 10 The Clerk shall transfer this matter, terminate all pending motions as moot and close the file. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 DATED 04/06/2015 THELTON E. HENDERSON United States District Judge 14 15 16 G:\PRO-SE\TEH\CR.15\Kurbegovich1348.trn.wpd 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?