Kurbegovich v. On Habeas Corpus
Filing
4
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 04/06/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2015) [Transferred from cand on 4/8/2015.]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
11
No C-15-1348 TEH (PR)
MUHAREM KURBEGOVICH,
12
Plaintiff,
ORDER OF TRANSFER
13
14
v.
UNKNOWN POLITICIANS,
15
Defendants.
16
/
17
18
While filed as a habeas petition, a review of the filing
19
indicates that Plaintiff is challenging the conditions of
20
confinement.
21
petition it would still be transferred as Plaintiff was found guilty
22
in 1980 in Los Angeles which is located in the Central District of
23
California.
24
Even if the Court were to review this case as a habeas
Plaintiff, a state prisoner currently incarcerated at
25
California State Prison - Corcoran, has filed a pro se civil rights
26
Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that his mail privileges
27
have been restricted which has unfairly affected his sentence.
28
California State Prison - Corcoran is located in Kings County,
1
which lies in the Eastern District of California.
2
or omissions giving rise to Plaintiff’s claims occurred in the
3
Eastern District of California.
4
therefore properly lies in the Eastern District.
5
1391(b).
6
Thus, the events
See 28 U.S.C. § 84(b).
Venue
See 28 U.S.C. §
Accordingly, in the interest of justice and pursuant to 28
7
U.S.C. § 1406(a), this action is transferred to the United States
8
District Court for the Eastern District of California.
9
10
The Clerk shall transfer this matter, terminate all
pending motions as moot and close the file.
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
DATED
04/06/2015
THELTON E. HENDERSON
United States District Judge
14
15
16
G:\PRO-SE\TEH\CR.15\Kurbegovich1348.trn.wpd
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?