Villery v. Garcia et al

Filing 69

SECOND SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER Directing Clerk's Office to Send Local Rule 281 to Plaintiff signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 02/07/2017. Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing set for 6/15/2017 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Jury Trial set for 8/1/2017 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Attachments: # 1 Rule 281)(Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JARED VILLERY,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
EDWARD GARCIA, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18

21

24
25

SECOND SCHEDULING ORDER
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO
SEND LOCAL RULE 281 TO PLAINTIFF
Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing:
June 15, 2017, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 (LJO)
Jury Trial:
August 1, 2017, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 (LJO)

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff and Defendants have declined United States Magistrate Judge
jurisdiction. (Doc. Nos. 7, 67, 68.)
This action is proceeding against Defendants George Rodriguez, Bryan Lindsey, Edward

22
23

Case No.: 1:15-cv-00936-LJO-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff Jared Villery is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

19
20

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Granillo, Brian Dagama, and David Stewart for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment.1
Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court now sets a further schedule
for this litigation.

26
27
28

1

Defendants George Rodriguez, Bryan Lindsey, and Edward Granillo are represented by the law firm of Burke, Williams
& Sorensen, and Defendants Brian Dagama and David Stewart are represented by the Office of the Attorney General.

1

1

The parties are required to file pretrial statements in accordance with the schedule set forth

2

herein. In addition to the matters already required to be addressed in the pretrial statement in

3

accordance with Local Rule 281, Plaintiff will be required to make a particularized showing in order

4

to obtain the attendance of witnesses. The procedures and requirements for making such a showing

5

are outlined in detail below. Plaintiff is advised that failure to comply with the procedures set forth

6

below may result in the preclusion of any and all witnesses named in his pretrial statement.

7

At the trial of this case, Plaintiff must be prepared to introduce evidence to prove each of the

8

alleged facts that support the claims raised in the lawsuit. In general, there are two kinds of trial

9

evidence: (1) exhibits and (2) the testimony of witnesses. It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to produce all

10

of the evidence to prove his case, whether that evidence is in the form of exhibits or witness testimony.

11

If Plaintiff wants to call witnesses to testify, he must follow certain procedures to ensure that the

12

witnesses will be at the trial and available to testify.

13

1.

Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to Testify

14

Voluntarily - An incarcerated witness who agrees voluntarily to attend trial to give testimony cannot

15

come to court unless the Court orders the warden or other custodian to permit the witness to be

16

transported to court. The Court will not issue such an order unless it is satisfied that the prospective

17

witness has actual knowledge of relevant facts.

18

A party intending to introduce the testimony of incarcerated witnesses who have agreed

19

voluntarily to attend the trial must serve and file concurrent with the pretrial statement a written

20

motion for a court order requiring that such witnesses be brought to court at the time of trial. The

21

motion must: (1) state the name, address, and prison identification number of each such witness; and

22

(2) be accompanied by declarations showing that each witness is willing to testify and that each

23

witness has actual knowledge of relevant facts. The motion should be entitled “Motion for Attendance

24

of Incarcerated Witnesses.”

25

The willingness of the prospective witness can be shown in one of two ways: (1) the party

26

himself can swear by declaration under penalty of perjury that the prospective witness has informed

27

the party that he or she is willing to testify voluntarily without being subpoenaed, in which declaration

28

the party must state when and where the prospective witness informed the party of this willingness; or
2

1

(2) the party can serve and file a declaration, signed under penalty of perjury by the prospective

2

witness, in which the witness states that he or she is willing to testify without being subpoenaed.

3

The prospective witness’s actual knowledge of relevant facts can be shown in one of two ways:

4

(1) if the party has actual firsthand knowledge that the prospective witness was an eyewitness or an

5

ear-witness to the relevant facts (e.g., if an incident occurred in Plaintiff’s cell and, at the time,

6

Plaintiff saw that a cellmate was present and observed the incident, Plaintiff may swear to the

7

cellmate’s ability to testify), the party himself can swear by declaration under penalty of perjury that

8

the prospective witness has actual knowledge; or (2) the party can serve and file a declaration signed

9

under penalty of perjury by the prospective witness in which the witness describes the relevant facts to

10

which the prospective witness was an eye or ear witness. Whether the declaration is made by the party

11

or by the prospective witness, it must be specific about the incident, when and where it occurred, who

12

was present, and how the prospective witness happened to be in a position to see or to hear what

13

occurred at the time it occurred.

14

The Court will review and rule on the motion for attendance of incarcerated witnesses,

15

specifying which prospective witnesses must be brought to court. Subsequently, the Court will issue

16

the order necessary to cause the witness’s custodian to bring the witness to court.

17
18
19

Motions for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses, if any, must be filed on or before April
14, 2017. Oppositions, if any, must be filed on or before April 28, 2017.
2.

Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses Who Refuse to Testify

20

Voluntarily - If a party seeks to obtain the attendance of incarcerated witnesses who refuse to testify

21

voluntarily, the party should submit with his pretrial statement a motion for the attendance of such

22

witnesses. Such motion should be in the form described above. In addition, the party must indicate in

23

the motion that the incarcerated witnesses are not willing to testify voluntarily.

24
25
26
27

Motions for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses, if any, must be filed on or before April
14, 2017. Oppositions, if any, must be filed on or before April 28, 2017.
3.

Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Unincarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to

Testify Voluntarily - It is the responsibility of the party who has secured an unincarcerated witness’s

28
3

1

voluntary attendance to notify the witness of the time and date of trial. No action need be sought or

2

obtained from the Court.

3

4.

Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Unincarcerated Witnesses Who Refuse to

4

Testify Voluntarily - If a prospective witness is not incarcerated, and he or she refuses to testify

5

voluntarily, the witness must be served with a subpoena. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45. In addition, the party

6

seeking the witness’s presence must tender an appropriate sum of money for the witness. Id. In the

7

case of an unincarcerated witness, the appropriate sum of money is the daily witness fee of $40.00

8

plus the witness’s travel expenses. 28 U.S.C. § 1821.

9

If Plaintiff wishes to obtain the attendance of one or more unincarcerated witnesses who refuse

10

to testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must first notify the Court in writing of the name and location of each

11

unincarcerated witness. The Court will calculate the travel expense for each unincarcerated witness

12

and notify Plaintiff of the amount(s). Plaintiff must then, for each witness, submit a money order

13

made payable to the witness for the full amount of the witness’s travel expenses plus the daily witness

14

fee of $40.00. The subpoena will not be served upon the unincarcerated witness by the United States

15

Marshal unless the money order is tendered to the Court. Because no statute authorizes the use of

16

public funds for these expenses in civil cases, the tendering of witness fees and travel expenses is

17

required even if the party was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

18

If Plaintiff wishes to have the Marshal serve any unincarcerated witnesses who refuse to testify

19

voluntarily, Plaintiff must submit the money orders to the Court no later than May 14, 2017. In order

20

to ensure timely submission of the money orders, Plaintiff must notify the Court of the names and

21

locations of his witnesses, in compliance with step one, on or before April 14, 2017.

22

The parties are advised that failure to file pretrial statements as required by this order may

23

result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, which may include dismissal of the action or entry of

24

default.

25

The following is important information about scheduling and trailing cases:

26

District Court Judges of the Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California have one of

27

the heaviest caseload in the nation. As a result, each District Judge schedules multiple trials to begin

28

on each available trial date. Civil cases will trail and begin as soon as a courtroom is cleared. The law
4

1

requires that the Court give any criminal trial priority over civil trials or any other matter. A civil trial

2

set to begin while a criminal trial is proceeding will trail the completion of the criminal trial.

3

The Court cannot give advance notice of which cases will trail or for how long because the

4

Court does not know which cases actually will go to trial or precisely how long each will last. Once

5

your trial date arrives, counsel, parties and witnesses must remain on 24-hour-stand-by until a court

6

opens. Since continuance to a date certain will simply postpone, but not solve, the problem,

7

continuances of any civil trial under these circumstances will no longer be entertained, absent a

8

specific and stated finding of good cause. The Court will use its best efforts to mitigate the effect of

9

the foregoing and to resolve all cases in a timely manner.

10

One alternative is for the parties to consent to a United States Magistrate Judge conducting all

11

proceedings, including trial and entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 28 U.S.C. 636(c),

12

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. The Eastern District Magistrate Judges, all

13

experienced former trial lawyers, use the same jury pool and same court facilities as United States

14

District Court Judges. Since Magistrate Judges do not conduct felony trials, they have greater

15

flexibility and schedule firm trial dates. Judgment entered by a United States Magistrate Judge is

16

appealable directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit. (While there are

17

scheduling benefits to consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, substantive rulings and decisions

18

will not be affected by whether a party chooses to consent or not.)

19

As another response to its large caseload, the Fresno Division of the Eastern District of

20

California is assigning cases, whenever possible, to Article III District Court Judges from around the

21

nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant to the Local Rules, Appendix A, such reassignments will be

22

random, and the parties will receive no advance notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III

23

District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern District of California.

24

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS as follows:

25

1.

26
27
28

This matter is set for telephonic trial confirmation hearing before the Honorable

Lawrence J. O’Neill on June 15, 2017, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4;
2.

This matter is set for jury trial before the Honorable Lawrence J. O’Neill on August 1,

2017, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4;
5

3.

1
2

Counsel for Defendants is required to arrange for the participation of Plaintiff in the

telephonic trial confirmation hearing and to initiate the telephonic hearing at [phone];

3

4.

4

April 14, 2017;

5

5.

6

Defendants shall serve and file a pretrial statement as described in this order on or

before April 28, 2017;
6.

7
8

Plaintiff shall serve and file a pretrial statement as described in this order on or before

In addition to electronically filing their pretrial statement, Defendants shall e-mail the

pretrial statement to: [e-mail];
7.

9

If Plaintiff intends to call incarcerated witnesses at time of trial, Plaintiff shall serve and

10

file a motion for attendance of incarcerated witnesses as described in this order on or before April 14,

11

2017;
8.

12
13

The opposition to the motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses, if any, shall

be filed on or before April 28, 2017;
9.

14

If Plaintiff wishes to obtain the attendance of unincarcerated witnesses who refuse to

15

testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must notify the Court of their names and locations on or before April 14,

16

2017, and Plaintiff must submit the money orders, as described in subsection 4 of this order, to the

17

Court on or before May 14, 2017; and
10.

18

The Clerk’s Office shall send Plaintiff a copy of Local Rule 281.

19
20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22

Dated:

23

February 7, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28
6