Hernandez v. Tulare County Correction Center et al
Filing
40
Scheduling ORDER and ORDER Directing Clerk to Send Plaintiff a Copy of Local Rule 281(b), signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 5/10/17. Telephonic Discovery Status Conference: September 13, 2017, Time: 1:30 p.m. Courtroom 10 (EPG); None xpert Discovery Cut-off: November 3, 2017; Expert Disclosure Deadline: December 1, 2017; Rebuttal Expert Disclosure Deadline: January 19, 2018; Expert Discovery Cut-off: February 9, 2018; Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline: March 9, 2018; Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing: September 24, 2018, Time: 3:00 p.m. Courtroom 10 (EPG); Jury Trial: January 29, 2019 Time: 8:30 a.m. Courtroom 10 (EPG). (Attachments: # 1 Local Rule 281) (Marrujo, C)
1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
ALBERT HERNANDEZ,
6
Plaintiff,
7
8
v.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
TULARE COUNTY CORRECTION
CENTER, et al.,
CASE NO. 1:16-cv-00413-EPG (PC)
SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER
DIRECTING CLERK TO SEND PLAINTIFF
A COPY OF LOCAL RULE 281(b)
Telephonic Discovery
Status Conference:
September 13, 2017
Time: 1:30 p.m.
Courtroom 10 (EPG)
Nonexpert
Discovery Cut-off: November 3, 2017
December 1, 2017
Rebuttal Expert
Disclosure Deadline:
January 19, 2018
Expert Discovery
Cut-off:
Defendants.
Expert Disclosure
Deadline:
February 9, 2018
Dispositive Motion
Filing Deadline:
March 9, 2018
20
Telephonic Trial
Confirmation Hearing: September 24, 2018
Time: 3:00 p.m.
Courtroom 10 (EPG)
21
Jury Trial:
19
22
23
24
25
26
27
January 29, 2019
Time: 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 10 (EPG)
This Court conducted a scheduling conference on May 3, 2017.
Plaintiff Albert
Hernandez telephonically appeared on his own behalf. Counsel Amy Terrible telephonically
appeared on behalf of defendants Tulare County Correction Center and Sheriff Mike Boudreaux.
Counsel Matthew Grigg telephonically appeared on behalf of defendant Corizon Health Services.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b), this Court now sets a schedule for this action.
28
1
1
I.
DISCOVERY PROCEDURES
2
The parties are now granted leave to serve discovery in addition to that provided as part of
3
initial disclosures. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1, 16, and 26-36, discovery shall
4
proceed as follows:
5
1. Discovery requests shall be served by the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
6
Procedure 5 and Local Rule 135. Discovery requests and responses shall not be filed
7
with the Court unless required by Local Rules 250.2, 250.3, or 250.4 (providing that
8
discovery requests shall not be filed unless or until there is a proceeding in which the
9
document or proof of service is at issue). A party may serve on any other party no
10
more than 15 interrogatories, 15 requests for production of documents, and 10 requests
11
for admission. On motion, these limits may be increased for good cause.
12
2. Responses to written discovery requests shall be due forty-five (45) days after the
13
request is first served. Boilerplate objections are disfavored and may be summarily
14
overruled by the Court. Responses to document requests shall include all documents
15
within a party’s possession, custody or control. Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a)(1). Documents
16
are deemed within a party’s possession, custody, or control if the party has actual
17
possession, custody, or control thereof, or the legal right to obtain the property on
18
demand.1
19
3. If any party or third party withholds a document on the basis of privilege, that party or
20
third party shall provide a privilege log to the requesting party identifying the date,
21
author, recipients, general subject matter, and basis of the privilege within thirty (30)
22
days after the date that responses are due. Failure to provide a privilege log within
23
this time shall result in a waiver of the privilege. To the extent the requesting party
24
disputes whether a document is privileged, it can raise that issue to the Court's
25
attention in its statement of a discovery dispute to be discussed at the discovery
26
1
27
28
Defendant(s)’ responses should be consistent with their right to request documents pursuant to
California Government Code § 3306.5 (“Each employer shall keep each public safety officers’ personnel file or a true
and correct copy thereof, and shall make the file or copy thereof available within a reasonable period of time after a
request thereof by the officer.”).
2
1
conference (see below). If a party or third party withholds a document on the basis of
2
the official information privilege, the requesting party may request that the Court
3
conduct an in camera review of such document so that the Court can balance the
4
moving party's need for the documents in the litigation against the reasons that are
5
asserted in defending their confidentiality. In any such request for in camera review,
6
the party requesting review shall identify, with specificity, the document(s) for which
7
review is sought.
8
4. The parties are required to act in good faith during the course of discovery and the
9
failure to do so may result in the payment of expenses pursuant to Federal Rule of
10
Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) or other appropriate sanctions authorized by the Federal
11
Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules.
12
5. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2)(B), Defendant(s) may depose
13
Plaintiff and any other witness confined in a prison on the condition that, at least
14
fourteen (14) days before such a deposition, Defendant(s) serve all parties with the
15
notice required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(1). Plaintiff’s failure to
16
participate in a properly noticed deposition could result in sanctions against Plaintiff,
17
including monetary sanctions and/or dismissal of this case. Pursuant to Federal Rule
18
of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), the parties may take any deposition under this section by
19
video conference without a further motion or order of the Court. Due to security
20
concerns and institutional considerations not applicable to Defendant(s), Plaintiff must
21
seek leave from the Court to depose incarcerated witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule of
22
Civil Procedure 30(a)(2). Nothing herein forecloses a party from bringing a motion
23
for protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1) if necessary.
24
6. With the Court’s permission, Plaintiff may serve third party subpoenas, including on
25
the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and/or the Office of the
26
Inspector General if Plaintiff seeks documents from them and the entities are not
27
presently defendants in this case. To issue a subpoena on these entities, or any other
28
third parties, Plaintiff must file a request for the issuance of a subpoena duces tecum
3
1
with the Court. If the Court approves the request, it may issue Plaintiff a subpoena
2
duces tecum, commanding the production of documents from a non-party, and may
3
command service of the subpoena by the United States Marshal Service. Fed. R. Civ.
4
P. 45; 28 U.S.C. 1915(d). However, the Court will consider granting such a request
5
only if the documents sought from the non-party are not equally available to Plaintiff
6
and are not obtainable from Defendant(s) through a request for production of
7
documents. Fed. R. Civ. P. 34. In any request for a subpoena, Plaintiff must: (1)
8
identify with specificity the documents sought and from whom, and (2) make a
9
showing in the request that the records are only obtainable through that third party.
10
The documents requested must also fall within the scope of discovery allowed in this
11
action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1).
12
7. A discovery conference has been set for September 13, 2017, at 1:30 p.m. Parties
13
have leave to appear by phone. To join the conference, each party is directed to call
14
the toll-free number (888) 251−2909 and use Access Code 1024453. Up until four
15
weeks before the discovery conference, the parties may file a motion to compel further
16
discovery responses. No later than two weeks before the discovery conference, the
17
responding party may file a response to the motion to compel. The motion should
18
include a copy of the request(s) and any response to the request(s) at issue. Unless
19
there is a need for discovery prior to the discovery conference, motions to compel will
20
not be considered until the discovery conference. Motions to compel will not be
21
permitted after the discovery conference absent good cause. The parties should be
22
prepared to address all discovery disputes at the discovery conference.
23
II.
PAGE LIMITS
24
The parties are advised that unless prior leave of the Court is obtained before the filing
25
deadline,2 all moving and opposition briefs or legal memoranda filed in civil cases before
26
Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean shall not exceed twenty-five (25) pages. Reply briefs by the
27
moving party shall not exceed ten (10) pages. These page limits do not include exhibits.
28
2
Parties may seek by filing a short motion.
4
1
III.
NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE
2
The deadline for the completion of all non-expert discovery is November 3, 2017. All
3
non-expert discovery must be provided by this date, including discovery compelled following the
4
discovery conference.
5
IV.
EXPERT DISCLOSURES
6
The deadline for all parties to serve their expert disclosures is December 1, 2017. Parties
7
have until January 19, 2018, to serve their rebuttal expert disclosures. The deadline for the
8
completion of all expert discovery is February 9, 2018.
9
V.
DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS DEADLINE
10
The deadline for filing all dispositive motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 (including
11
dispositive motions based on failure to exhaust administrative remedies) is March 9, 2018.
12
Failure to raise the exhaustion issue by the deadline will result in waiver of the defense. See
13
Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1170 (9th Cir.) (providing that the exhaustion question should be
14
decided as early as feasible), cert. denied sub nom. Scott v. Albino, 135 S. Ct. 403, 190 L. Ed. 2d
15
307 (2014).
16
VI.
17
18
19
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
The Court is not setting a settlement conference at this time.
VII.
MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION
The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
20
§ 636(c). (ECF No. 39).
21
VIII. TELEPHONIC TRIAL CONFIRMATION HEARING
22
The Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing is set for September 24, 2018, at 3:00 p.m.,
23
in Courtroom 10, before Magistrate Judge Grosjean. Parties have leave to appear by phone. To
24
attend the Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing by phone, each party participating by phone is
25
directed to call the toll-free number (888) 251−2909 and use Access Code 1024453.
26
In addition to the matters already required to be addressed in the pretrial statement in
27
accordance with Local Rule 281, Plaintiff will be required to make a particularized showing in
28
order to obtain the attendance of witnesses. The procedures and requirements for making such a
5
1
showing are outlined in detail below.
2
procedures set forth below may result in the preclusion of any or all witnesses named in his
3
pretrial statement.
Plaintiff is advised that failure to comply with the
4
At the trial of this case, Plaintiff must be prepared to introduce evidence to prove each of
5
the alleged facts that support the claims raised in the lawsuit. In general, there are two kinds of
6
trial evidence: (1) exhibits and (2) the testimony of witnesses. It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to
7
produce all of the evidence to prove his case, whether that evidence is in the form of exhibits or
8
witness testimony.
9
procedures to ensure that the witnesses will be at the trial and available to testify.
10
1.
If Plaintiff wants to call witnesses to testify, he must follow certain
Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to
11
Testify Voluntarily - An incarcerated witness who agrees voluntarily to attend trial to give
12
testimony cannot come to court unless this Court orders the warden or other custodian to permit
13
the witness to be transported to court. This Court will not issue such an order unless it is satisfied
14
that: (a) the prospective witness is willing to attend; and (b) the prospective witness has actual
15
knowledge of relevant facts.
16
A party intending to introduce the testimony of incarcerated witnesses who have agreed
17
voluntarily to attend the trial must serve and file concurrent with the pretrial statement a written
18
motion for a court order requiring that such witnesses be brought to court at the time of trial. The
19
motion must: (1) state the name, address, and prison identification number of each such witness;
20
and (2) be accompanied by declarations showing that each witness is willing to testify and that
21
each witness has actual knowledge of relevant facts. The motion should be entitled “A Motion
22
for Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses.”
23
The willingness of the prospective witness can be shown in one of two ways: (1) the party
24
himself can swear by declaration under penalty of perjury that the prospective witness has
25
informed the party that he or she is willing to testify voluntarily without being subpoenaed, in
26
which declaration the party must state when and where the prospective witness informed the party
27
of this willingness; or (2) the party can serve and file a declaration, signed under penalty of
28
perjury by the prospective witness, in which the witness states that he or she is willing to testify
6
1
without being subpoenaed.
2
The prospective witness’s actual knowledge of relevant facts can be shown in one of two
3
ways: (1) if the party has actual firsthand knowledge that the prospective witness was an
4
eyewitness or an ear-witness to the relevant facts (i.e., if an incident occurred in plaintiff’s cell
5
and, at the time, plaintiff saw that a cellmate was present and observed the incident, plaintiff may
6
swear to the cellmate’s ability to testify), the party himself can swear by declaration under penalty
7
of perjury that the prospective witness has actual knowledge; or (2) the party can serve and file a
8
declaration signed under penalty of perjury by the prospective witness in which the witness
9
describes the relevant facts to which the prospective witness was an eye- or ear witness. Whether
10
the declaration is made by the party or by the prospective witness, it must be specific about the
11
incident, when and where it occurred, who was present, and how the prospective witness
12
happened to be in a position to see or to hear what occurred at the time it occurred.
13
The Court will review and rule on the motion for attendance of incarcerated witnesses,
14
specifying which prospective witnesses must be brought to Court. Subsequently, the Court will
15
issue the order necessary to cause the witness’s custodian to bring the witness to Court.
16
17
18
Motions for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses, if any, must be filed on or before
July 23, 2018. Oppositions, if any, must be filed on or before August 23, 2018.
2.
Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses Who Refuse to
19
Testify Voluntarily - If a party seeks to obtain the attendance of incarcerated witnesses who
20
refuse to testify voluntarily, the party should submit with his pretrial statement a motion for the
21
attendance of such witnesses. Such motion should be in the form described above. In addition,
22
the party must indicate in the motion that the incarcerated witnesses are not willing to testify
23
voluntarily.
24
3.
Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Unincarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to
25
Testify Voluntarily - It is the responsibility of the party who has secured an unincarcerated
26
witness’s voluntary attendance to notify the witness of the time and date of trial. No action need
27
be sought or obtained from the Court.
28
4.
Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Unincarcerated Witnesses Who Refuse to
7
1
Testify Voluntarily - If a prospective witness is not incarcerated, and he or she refuses to testify
2
voluntarily, the witness must be served with a subpoena. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45. In addition, the
3
party seeking the witness’s presence must tender an appropriate sum of money for the witness.
4
Id. In the case of an unincarcerated witness, the appropriate sum of money is the daily witness
5
fee of $40.00 plus the witness’s travel expenses. 28 U.S.C. § 1821.
6
If Plaintiff wishes to obtain the attendance of one or more unincarcerated witnesses who
7
refuse to testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must first notify the Court in writing of the name and
8
location of each unincarcerated witness. The Court will calculate the travel expense for each
9
unincarcerated witness and notify Plaintiff of the amount(s). Plaintiff must then, for each witness,
10
submit a money order made payable to the witness for the full amount of the witness’s travel
11
expenses plus the daily witness fee of $40.00. The subpoena will not be served upon the
12
unincarcerated witness by the United States Marshal unless the money order is tendered to the
13
Court. Because no statute authorizes the use of public funds for these expenses in civil cases, the
14
tendering of witness fees and travel expenses is required even if the party was granted leave to
15
proceed in forma pauperis.
16
If Plaintiff wishes to have the Marshal serve any unincarcerated witnesses who refuse to
17
testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must submit the money orders to the Court no later than August 23,
18
2018. In order to ensure timely submission of the money orders, Plaintiff must notify the Court
19
of the names and locations of his witnesses, in compliance with step 4 above, no later than July
20
23, 2018.
21
Plaintiff shall file and serve a pretrial statement as described in this order on or before
22
July 23, 2018. Defendant(s) shall file and serve a pretrial statement as described in this order on
23
or before August 23, 2018.
24
The parties are advised that failure to file pretrial statements as required by this order may
25
result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, which may include dismissal of the action or
26
entry of default.
27
28
The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a copy of Local Rule 281(b).
IX.
TRIAL DATE
8
1
A 1-3 day jury trial is set for January 29, 2019, at 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom 10, before
2
Magistrate Judge Grosjean.
3
X.
EFFECT OF THIS ORDER
4
This order represents the Court and the parties’ best estimated schedule to complete this
5
case. Any party unable to comply with the dates outlined in this order shall immediately file an
6
appropriate motion or stipulation identifying the requested modification(s).
7
The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a
8
showing of good cause, even if a stipulation to modify is filed. Due to the impacted nature of the
9
civil case docket, this Court disfavors requests to modify established dates.
10
Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 10, 2017
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?