Holguin v. Qualls

Filing 10

SECOND ORDER TO SUBMIT Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis or Pay Filing Fee Within 45 Days signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/27/2017. (Attachments: # 1 IFP Application). (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 1:17-cv-00376-AWI-SAB (PC) PABLO HOLGUIN, SECOND ORDER TO SUBMIT APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE WITHIN 45 DAYS v. J. QUALLS, 13 Defendant. 14 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 15 16 ' 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant action on March 15, 2017, and submitted a motion to proceed in forma pauperis; however, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis was incomplete. 17 18 On March 20, 2017, the Court directed Plaintiff to submit a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee. 19 20 21 22 On April 26, 2017, Plaintiff filed a second motion to proceed in forma pauperis, but the application is again incomplete, namely, Plaintiff failed to utilize the proper form provided to him with the March 20, 2017, order and the motion does not contain his signature authorizing the collection of fees from his trust account in accordance with 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(b)(2). 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 Within forty-five (45) days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall submit the 3 attached application to proceed in forma pauperis, completed and signed, or in the alternative, 4 pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action. No requests for extension will be granted without a 5 showing of good cause. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this 6 action. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: April 27, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?