Holguin v. Qualls
Filing
10
SECOND ORDER TO SUBMIT Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis or Pay Filing Fee Within 45 Days signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/27/2017. (Attachments: # 1 IFP Application). (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
1:17-cv-00376-AWI-SAB (PC)
PABLO HOLGUIN,
SECOND ORDER TO SUBMIT
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE WITHIN
45 DAYS
v.
J. QUALLS,
13
Defendant.
14
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
15
16
' 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant action on March 15, 2017, and submitted a motion to proceed in
forma pauperis; however, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis was incomplete.
17
18
On March 20, 2017, the Court directed Plaintiff to submit a complete application to
proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee.
19
20
21
22
On April 26, 2017, Plaintiff filed a second motion to proceed in forma pauperis, but the
application is again incomplete, namely, Plaintiff failed to utilize the proper form provided to him
with the March 20, 2017, order and the motion does not contain his signature authorizing the
collection of fees from his trust account in accordance with 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(b)(2).
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
Within forty-five (45) days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall submit the
3
attached application to proceed in forma pauperis, completed and signed, or in the alternative,
4
pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action. No requests for extension will be granted without a
5
showing of good cause. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this
6
action.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated:
April 27, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?