Derwin Butler, Sr. v. Escamilla et al
Filing
7
ORDER to Submit Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or Pay Filing Fee within Twenty-One Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/30/17. (Attachments: # 1 IFP Application and Instructions)(Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DERWIN BUTLER, SR.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
Case No. 1:17-cv-00623 MJS (PC)
ORDER TO SUBMIT APPLICATION
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
OR PAY FILING FEE WITHIN TWENTYONE (21) DAYS
v.
ESCAMILLA, et al.,
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42
18
U.S.C. ยง 1983. Plaintiff has not paid the $400.00 filing fee, or submitted an application to
19
proceed in forma pauperis on the appropriate form. On May 5, 2017, the Court ordered
20
Plaintiff to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $400.00 filing
21
fee. (ECF No. 3.) On May 24, 2017, Plaintiff attempted to file a motion to proceed in
22
forma pauperis, but did so using an incorrect form. (ECF No. 6.) To proceed in forma
23
pauperis in this action, Plaintiff must use the application provided by the Court on May 5,
24
2017. Another copy of the correct application will be provided with this Order.
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of service of this Order, Plaintiff shall
27
submit the attached application to proceed in forma pauperis, completed and signed, or
28
in the alternative, pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action. No requests for extension
1
1
will be granted without a showing of good cause. Failure to comply with this Order
2
will result in dismissal of this action.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 30, 2017
/s/
6
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?