Roe v. McCurry et al
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why This Action Should Not be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute and Failure to Obey a Court Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/8/17. Motion for IFP or Show Cause Response Due Within Twenty Days. (Attachments: # 1 Application for IFP)(Gonzalez, R)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL MATHEW ROE,
Case No. 1:17-cv-01220-BAM (PC)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND
FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER
McCURRY, et al.,
(ECF No. 4)
TWENTY (20) DAY DEADLINE
Plaintiff Michael Mathew Roe (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this
civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on September 11, 2017.
(ECF No. 1.) On September 14, 2017, the Court issued an order directing Plaintiff to submit an
application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee within forty-five (45) days. (ECF
No. 4.) The deadline to submit the application or pay the filing fee has expired, and Plaintiff has
not complied with this order or otherwise communicated with the Court about this matter.
Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Local
Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all
sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” Further, the failure of Plaintiff to prosecute
this action is grounds for dismissal. In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability
Litigation, 460 F.3d 1217, 1226 (9th Cir. 2006).
Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that:
1. The Clerk of the Court shall serve this order and a blank application to proceed in forma
pauperis on Plaintiff;
2. Within twenty (20) days of service of this order, Plaintiff shall EITHER:
a. Complete and return the application to proceed in forma pauperis, or in the
alternative, pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action; OR
b. Show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed for failure to
prosecute and failure to obey a court order; and
3. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action
for failure to prosecute and failure to obey a court order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
November 8, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?