Serrano v. Bank of America, N.A. et al

Filing 4

ORDER for Plaintiff to (1) File a First Amended Complaint, or (2) Notify the Court that She Wishes to Stand on Her Complaint, Subject to Findings and Recommendations to the District Judge Consistent with this Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/9/18. Thirty-Day Deadline. (Attachments: # 1 Complaint Form)(Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13

SONIA ALVAREZ SERRANO,
Plaintiff,

14
15
16

Case No. 1:18-cv-00313-LJO-EPG
ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO:

v.

(1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT, OR

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al.,

20

(2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT SHE
WISHES TO STAND ON HER
COMPLAINT, SUBJECT TO
FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE
DISTRICT JUDGE CONSISTENT
WITH THIS ORDER

21

(ECF NO. 1)

17

Defendants.

18
19

22

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

23
24
25
26
27
28

Sonia Alvarez Serrano (“Plaintiff”), appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the
complaint commencing this action on March 6, 2018. (ECF No. 1). The Court has screened the
complaint and has determined that Plaintiff has failed to state any cognizable claims. The Court
will grant Plaintiff leave to amend her complaint to state a claim. In the alternative, Plaintiff may
notify the Court that she wishes to stand on the current complaint, in which case the Court will
1

1

issue findings and recommendations to the district judge recommending dismissal of this action

2

consistent with this order.

3

I.

4

LEGAL STANDARD
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the Court must conduct a review of a pro se complaint to

5

determine whether it “state[s] a claim on which relief may be granted,” is “frivolous or

6

malicious,” or “seek[s] monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.” If

7

the Court determines that the complaint fails to state a claim, it must be dismissed. Id. Leave to

8

amend may be granted to the extent that the deficiencies of the complaint can be cured by

9

amendment. Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1106 (9th Cir. 1995).

10

A complaint must contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the

11

pleader is entitled to relief . . . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). Detailed factual allegations are not

12

required, but “[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere

13

conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (citing Bell

14

Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)). Plaintiff must set forth “sufficient factual

15

matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S.

16

at 663 (quoting Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555). While factual allegations are accepted as true, legal

17

conclusions are not. Id. at 678. Furthermore, a plaintiff bears the burden of separately setting forth

18

her legal claims, and for each claim, briefly and clearly providing the facts supporting the claim

19

so that the court and the defendants are readily able to understand the claims. Bautista v. Los

20

Angeles Cnty., 216 F.3d 837, 840-41 (9th Cir. 2000).

21

In determining whether a complaint states an actionable claim, the Court must accept the

22

allegations in the complaint as true, Hosp. Bldg. Co. v. Trs. of Rex Hospital, 425 U.S. 738, 740

23

(1976), construe pro se pleadings liberally in the light most favorable to the Plaintiff, Resnick v.

24

Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000), and resolve all doubts in the Plaintiff’s favor. Jenkins

25

v. McKeithen, 395 U.S. 411, 421 (1969). Pleadings of pro se plaintiffs “must be held to less

26

stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342

27

(9th Cir. 2010) (holding that pro se complaints should continue to be liberally construed after

28

Iqbal).
2

1

II.

2

The complaint reads as follows:

3

Litigation on wrongful foreclosure and many violations federal
statutes. Fair Housing violation, HARP, Keep Your Home
Emotional Distress Fraud, larceny, theft, false promises. . . .

4
5

Securiazation [sic] -violations RICO Quiet Title Judgment,
Summary Judgement. Defendants defaulted 7 times, Declaratory
Judgement, Motion for Adjudication. Recovery and Compensation
for defendants aggressions to plaintiff, Fair Due process Jury Trial
over 100 claims over hundred violations Federal question.

6
7
8
9
10
11

Plaintiff also attaches to her complaint what appears to be a 137-page long motion filed in
Alvarez v. Bank of America, Case No. 3:17-mc-80149-VC (N.D. Ca. filed Nov. 30, 2017).
III.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

ANALYSIS
Plaintiff’s complaint fails to meet the pleading standard set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2).

12
13

PLAINTIFF’S ALLEGATIONS

Plaintiff’s complaint contains a list of causes of action and conclusory statements. Plaintiff does
not set forth any factual allegations to support the conclusory statements or to show her
entitlement to relief. Furthermore, to the extent that Plaintiff seeks to incorporate the contents of
the motion filed in her prior case into her complaint, Plaintiff fails to meet the requirement that a
complaint contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to
relief.” The motion is excessive in length—bringing the length of the complaint to 144 pages—
and is incoherent. It combines various legal rules with prayers to and messages from Jesus Christ.
Accordingly, Plaintiff fails to allege a cognizable claim.
IV.

CONCLUSION AND ORDER
The Court finds that Plaintiff=s complaint fails to state any cognizable claim upon which

relief may be granted under § 1983. Under Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
“leave to amend shall be freely given when justice so requires.” Accordingly, the Court will
provide Plaintiff with time to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified above.
Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126-30 (9th Cir. 2000). Plaintiff is granted leave to file an

26
amended complaint within thirty (30) days, if she chooses to do so.
27
28
3

1

Because Rule 8(a) requires a short and plain statement of the claim, twenty (20) pages are

2

sufficient for Plaintiff to identify her claims and set forth specific facts in support of those claims.

3

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s amended complaint may not exceed twenty (20) pages in length. Failure

4

to follow this directive may result in dismissal of this case. See Miller v. California Dept. of

5

Corrections and Rehabilitation, No. 1:12-CV-00353-LJO, 2013 WL 5954803, at *3 (E.D. Cal.,

6

Nov. 6, 2013) (“[T]he federal court has the authority to dismiss a complaint for violation of Rule

7

8(a) and to set a reasonable limitation on the page length of a pleading. . . . Therefore, the court

8

does not find the Magistrate Judge's dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint for violation of Rule 8(a),

9

with leave to file an amended complaint not exceeding 25 pages, erroneous or contrary to law.”).

10

Plaintiff is advised that an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint, Lacey v.

11

Maricopa County, 693 F.3d. 896, 907 n.1 (9th Cir. 2012), and must be complete in itself without

12

reference to the prior or superseded pleading, Local Rule 220. Therefore, in an amended

13

complaint, as in an original complaint, each claim and the involvement of each defendant must be

14

sufficiently alleged. The amended complaint should be clearly and boldly titled “First Amended

15

Complaint,” and refer to the appropriate case number.

16

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

17

1.

The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff a Complaint for a Civil Case form;

18

2.

Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint curing the deficiencies identified by

19

the Court in this order if she believes additional true factual allegations would state a claim,

20

within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order;

21

3.

If Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, Plaintiff shall caption the

22

amended complaint “First Amended Complaint” and refer to the case number 1:18-cv-00313-

23

LJO-EPG;

24

4.

Alternatively, within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order,

25

Plaintiff may notify the Court that she wishes to stand on this complaint, subject to this Court

26

issuing findings and recommendations to the assigned district court judge recommending that the

27

case be dismissed for failure to state a claim; and

28

5.

If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint or notify the Court that she wishes to
4

1

stand on this complaint within thirty days from the date of service of this order, the Court will

2

issue findings and recommendations to the assigned district court judge recommending that

3

Plaintiff’s case be dismissed for failure to state a claim and failure to comply with a Court order.

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

March 9, 2018

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5