ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, a Project of California Renewal et al v. Bowen et al

Filing 11

MOTION to expedite this action by ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, a Project of California Renewal, National Organization for Marriage California - Yes on 8, Sponsored by National Organization for Marriage, John Doe #1. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Chandler, Timothy) Modified on 1/13/2009 (Carlos, K).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

James Bopp, Jr. (Ind. State Bar No. 2838-84)* Barry A. Bostrom (Ind. State Bar No.11912-84)* Sarah E. Troupis (Wis. State Bar No. 1061515)* Scott F. Bieniek (Ill. State Bar No. 6295901)* BOPP, COLESON & BOSTROM 1 South Sixth Street Terre Haute, IN 47807-3510 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Counsel for All Plaintiffs Timothy D. Chandler (Cal. State Bar No. 234325)** ALLIANCE DEFENSE FUND 101 Parkshore Drive, Suite 100 Folsom, CA 95630 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Counsel for All Plaintiffs * Pro Hac Vice Application Pending ** Designated Counsel for Service United States District Court Eastern District of California Sacramento Division

ProtectMarriage.com, et al., v. Debra Bowen, et al., Defendants. Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:09-CV-00058-MCE-DAD [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO EXPEDITE

[Proposed] Order Granting Motion to Expedite

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Having considered Plaintiffs' Motion to Expedite, the memorandums in support and opposition, the Court being fully advised, and good cause shown: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Expedite is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED this ____ day of January, 2009.

______________________________ Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr. United States District Judge

[Proposed] Order Granting Motion to Expedite

2