- Yes on 8, a Project of California Renewal et al v. Bowen et al

Filing 177

REQUEST for Telephonic Appearance on 171 Motion under Rule 56(f) Hearing by plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order granting Request for Telephonic Appearance) (Bieniek, Scott) Modified on 6/16/2009 (Marciel, M).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs' Request for Telephonic Appearance United States District Court Eastern District of California Sacramento Division PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. DEBRA BOWEN, et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:09-CV-00058-MCE-DAD Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. [Proposed] Order Granting Request for Telephonic Appearance on State Defendants' Motion Under Rule 56(f) Having reviewed Plaintiffs' request to make a telephonic appearance at the Rule 56(f) hearing scheduled for June 18, 2009, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' counsel may appear telephonically at the June 18, 2009 hearing on State Defendants' Rule 56(f) motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this ____ day of June, 2009. MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?