ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, a Project of California Renewal et al v. Bowen et al
Filing
214
NOTICE OF HEARING on motion to #210 MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER by Department of Elections - City and County of San Francisco . Hearing SET for 5/13/2010 2:00pm Courtroom 7, before the Honorable Morrison C. England Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Givner, Jonathan) Modified on 5/3/2010 (Duong, D).
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar # 139669 City Attorney WAYNE SNODGRASS, State Bar # 148137 JON GIVNER, State Bar # 208000 ANDREW SHEN, State Bar # 232499 MOLLIE LEE, State Bar # 251404 Deputy City Attorneys One Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place City Hall, Room 234 San Francisco, California 94102-4682 Telephone: (415) 554-4705 Facsimile: (415) 554-4745 E-Mail: mollie.lee@sfgov.org Attorneys for Defendants Department of Elections - City and County of San Francisco and Dennis J. Herrera, City Attorney for the City and County of San Francisco (Additional Counsel on next page)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION ProtectMarriage.com, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Debra Bowen, et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:09-CV-00058-MCE-DAD NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES Hearing Date: Time: Before: May 13, 2010 2:00 p.m. Hon. Morrison C. England Jr. United States District Court Eastern District Courtroom 7, 14th Floor 501 I Street Sacramento, CA 95814
Notice of Motion to Modify Pretrial Scheduling Order CASE NO. 2:09-CV-00058-MCE-DAD
1
n:\govlit\li2010\090774\00626124.doc
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
EDMUND G. BROWN JR., State Bar # 37100 Attorney General of California ZACKERY P. MORAZZINI, State Bar # 204237 Supervising Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P. O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 445-8226 Facsimile: (916) 324-5567 Zackery.Morazzini@doj.ca.gov Counsel for Defendants Debra Bowen, California Secretary of State, and Edmund G. Brown, Jr., California Attorney General SCOTT HALLABRIN, State Bar # 76662 General Counsel LAWRENCE T. WOODLOCK, State Bar # 137676 Senior Commission Counsel Fair Political Practices Commission 428 J Street, Suite 620 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 322-55660 Facsimile: (916) 327-2026 Lwoodlock@fppc.ca.gov Counsel for Defendants Members of the Fair Political Practices Commission
Notice of Motion to Modify Pretrial Scheduling Order CASE NO. 2:09-CV-00058-MCE-DAD
2
n:\govlit\li2010\090774\00626124.doc
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on May 13, 2010, commencing at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 7, 14th Floor, of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, before the Honorable Morrison C. England Jr., defendants City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco City Attorney Denis J. Herrera, California Secretary of State Debra Bowen, California Attorney General Edmund G. Brown, Jr., and members of the Fair Political Practices Commission will, and hereby do, move for an Order to Modify the Court's May 15, 2009 Scheduling Order to Extend Deadlines. This motion is based on this notice, the memorandum of points and authorities and declaration of Mollie Lee filed with this Court on April 27, 2010, and such argument and authority as may be presented at hearing. The briefing schedule is set in accordance with the Court's April 30, 2010 Order Granting Defendants' Application to Shorten Time on Motion to Modify Scheduling Order, attached hereto as Exhibit A. Dated: April 30, 2010 By /s/Jonathan Givner JONATHAN GIVNER Attorney for Defendants Department of Elections City and County of San Francisco and Dennis J. Herrera
Notice of Motion to Modify Pretrial Scheduling Order CASE NO. 2:09-CV-00058-MCE-DAD
3
n:\govlit\li2010\090774\00626124.doc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?