Jurin v. Google Inc.

Filing 6

EX PARTE APPLICATION by Google, Inc. for Extension of time to respond to complaint. Attorney Caruso, Margaret Mary added. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration M. Caruso)(Caruso, Margaret)

Download PDF
Jurin v. Google Inc. Doc. 6 1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP Margret M. Caruso (Bar No. 243473) margretcaruso@quinnemanuel.com 2 Cheryl A. Galvin (Bar No. 252262) cherylgalvin@quinnemanuel.com 3 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 4 Redwood Shores, CA 94065-2129 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 5 Attorneys for Defendant 6 Google Inc. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION DANIEL JURIN, an Individual, Plaintiff, vs. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant. CASE NO. 2:09-cv-03065-MCE-KJM GOOGLE INC.'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-144, Defendant Google Inc. ("Google") respectfully requests an extension of time of 30 days until December 30, 2009 by which to respond to the complaint of Plaintiff Daniel Jurin ("Jurin"). As is demonstrated in the accompanying Declaration of Margret M. Caruso, good cause exists for Google's request for an extension of time. This is Google's first request for an extension of time in this action. The complaint was served on November 10, 2009. Declaration of Margret M. Caruso, dated Nov. 23, 2009, 3. Google's response to the complaint is currently due on November 30, 2009. Id. at 4. Google plans to file a Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) and a Motion for Costs under Rule 41(d) and requests an extension of time to prepare the motions and to account for the personal, Thanksgiving-related plans of the attorneys working on this matter. Id. at 5. Jurin has refused Google's request for an extension. Id. at 6. -1Google's Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, Google respectfully requests that the Court enter an order extending 2 Google's time to respond to the complaint by 30 days, to December 30, 2009, consistent with the 3 [Proposed] Order that Google is submitting with this Ex Parte Application. 4 5 DATED: November 23, 2009 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2By /s/ Margret M. Caruso Margret M. Caruso Attorneys for Google Inc. QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP Margret M. Caruso (Bar No. 243473) margretcaruso@quinnemanuel.com Cheryl A. Galvin (Bar No. 252262) cherylgalvin@quinnemanuel.com 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 Redwood Shores, CA 94065-2129 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION CASE NO. 2:09-cv-03065-MCE-KJM [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING GOOGLE INC.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO THE INITIAL COMPLAINT 12 DANIEL JURIN, an Individual, 13 14 vs. Plaintiff, 15 GOOGLE, INC., 16 17 18 19 20 [PROPOSED] ORDER Upon consideration of the ex parte application submitted in this matter, Google's request Defendants. 21 to extend its time to answer or otherwise respond to the initial complaint by 30 days to December 22 30, 2009 is hereby GRANTED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 By UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -1DATED: _________________, 2009 Google's Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?