Knanishu v. Hedgpeth
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/25/10 ORDERING Petitioner to on the form provided by the Clerk of the Court,within 30 days from the date of this order, a complete application for leave to proceed in formapauperis, with the certification required by Rule 3(a)(2), or pay the appropriate filing fee; petitioners motion for appointment of counsel 2 is denied withoutprejudice to renewal, at the earliest, after an answer to the petition has been filed; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a new formApplication to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. (Attachments: # 1 IFP Application and Form)(Carlos, K) Modified on 8/26/2010 (Carlos, K).
(HC) Knanishu v. Hedgpeth
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Respondent. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, along with a "certification from the warden or other appropriate officer of the place of confinement showing the amount of money or securities that the petitioner has in any account in the institution" as required by Rule 3(a)(2) of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, or paid the required filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to submit either a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, with the required certification, or pay the appropriate filing fee. As to the certification requirement, while a copy of petitioner's prison trust account statement certified by prison officials is not required to satisfy the requirement, such a statement will suffice. 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KENNETH KNANISHU, Petitioner,
No. CIV S-10-2171-CMK-P
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Petitioner is warned that failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. Petitioner seeks the appointment of counsel (Doc. 2). There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner shall submit on the form provided by the Clerk of the Court,
within 30 days from the date of this order, a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, with the certification required by Rule 3(a)(2), or pay the appropriate filing fee; 2. Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. 2) is denied without
prejudice to renewal, at the earliest, after an answer to the petition has been filed; and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a new form
Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.
DATED: August 25, 2010 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?