IconFind, Inc. v. Google, Inc.
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM by IconFind, Inc. in support of 35 Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Proposed Order)(Folgers, Anna) Modified on 4/20/2011 (Becknal, R).
EXHIBIT E
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/appxl_35_U_S_C_112.htm
United States Patent and Trademark Office
PATENTS
Home|Site Index|Search|FAQ|Glossary|Guides|Contacts|eBusiness|eBiz alerts|News|Help
Patents > Search Collections > MPEP > 35 U.S.C. 112 Specification. - Patent Laws
Go to MPEP - Table of Contents
browse before
35 U.S.C. 112 Specification. - Patent Laws
35 U.S.C. 112 Specification.
The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the
manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact
terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it
is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best
mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention.
The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out
and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his
invention.
A claim may be written in independent or, if the nature of the case admits, in
dependent or multiple dependent form.
Subject to the following paragraph, a claim in dependent form shall contain a
reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the
subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate
by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers.
A claim in multiple dependent form shall contain a reference, in the alternative only,
to more than one claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of
the subject matter claimed. A multiple dependent claim shall not serve as a basis
for any other multiple dependent claim. A multiple dependent claim shall be
construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the particular claim in
relation to which it is being considered.
An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for
performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in
support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding
structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof.
(Amended July 24, 1965, Public Law 89-83, sec. 9, 79 Stat. 261; Nov. 14, 1975,
Public Law 94-131, sec. 7, 89 Stat. 691.)
browse after
Page 1 of 2
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/appxl_35_U_S_C_112.htm
KEY:
=online business system
=fees
=forms
(glossary)
=help
=laws/regulations
=definition
The Inventors Assistance Center is available to help you on patent matters.Send questions about USPTO programs and services to the USPTO
Contact Center (UCC). You can suggest USPTO webpages or material you would like featured on this section by E-mail to the
webmaster@uspto.gov. While we cannot promise to accommodate all requests, your suggestions will be considered and may lead to other
improvements on the website.
|.HOME | SITE INDEX| SEARCH | eBUSINESS | HELP | PRIVACY POLICY
Last Modified: 12/18/2008 06:37:59
Go to MPEP - Table of Contents
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?