Stamos v. Rackley et al

Filing 15

ORDER OF TRANSFER. This case is to be transferred to the Eastern District of California. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 08/16/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2011)[Transferred from cand on 8/18/2011.]

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. C-11-2927 TEH (PR) JOHN GEORGE STAMOS, JR., ORDER OF TRANSFER v. R. J. RACKLEY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 18 Plaintiff, a prisoner presently incarcerated at Salinas 19 Valley State Prison in Soledad, California, has filed a pro se civil 20 rights Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that prison 21 officials at Deuel Vocational Institution in Tracy, California 22 violated his constitutional rights when he was incarcerated at that 23 facility. 24 San Joaquin County. 25 Doc. #1. Deuel Vocational Institution is located within A substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise 26 to the claim(s) occurred in San Joaquin County, which lies within 27 the venue of the Eastern District of California. 28 84(b). See 28 U.S.C. § Venue therefore properly lies in the Eastern District. See 1 id. § 1391(b). 2 Accordingly, in the interest of justice and pursuant to 28 3 U.S.C. § 1406(a), IT IS ORDERED that this action be TRANSFERRED to 4 the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 5 California. 6 resolve Plaintiff’s pending motions (Docs. ## 2 and 12). 7 The Clerk shall transfer this matter, terminate all 8 In light of the transfer, this Court will not pending motions as moot, and close the file. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 DATED 08/16/2011 THELTON E. HENDERSON United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 G:\PRO-SE\TEH\CR.11\Stamos-11-2927-transfer-caed.wpd 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?