Arnold v. County of Sacramento et al
Filing
13
REQUEST to continue Scheduling Conference and related dates by 45 days by Connie Arnold. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Lim, Mary) Modified on 9/24/2012 (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
CONNIE ARNOLD
Plaintiff,
14
15
vs.
16
17
18
19
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO;
SACRAMENTO PUBLIC LIBRARY
AUTHORITY; SUNRISE
RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT;
and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
20
21
22
23
24
25
Defendants.
) Case No.: 12-CV-01998-LKK-EFB
)
Civil Rights
)
) [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE
) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND
) RELATED DATES BY 45 DAYS
)
) Old Dates
) Last Day for Meeting
) of Counsel:
10/01/2012
) Status Reports Due:
10/09/2012
) Scheduling Conference: 10/22/2012
)
) New Dates
) Last Day for Meeting
) of Counsel:
11/15/2012
) Status Reports Due:
11/23/2012
) Scheduling Conference: 12/06/2012
)
26
27
28
________________________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES BY 45
DAYS
Case No. 12-CV-01998-LKK-EFB
1
1
2
Pursuant to Plaintiff’s request, and finding good cause therefore, this Court
hereby continues the scheduling conference and related dates by forty-five (45) days.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated:
7
8
9
By:
HONORABLE LAWRENCE K. KARLTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
________________________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES BY 45
DAYS
Case No. 12-CV-01998-LKK-EFB
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?