Arnold v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 13

REQUEST to continue Scheduling Conference and related dates by 45 days by Connie Arnold. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Lim, Mary) Modified on 9/24/2012 (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 CONNIE ARNOLD Plaintiff, 14 15 vs. 16 17 18 19 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; SACRAMENTO PUBLIC LIBRARY AUTHORITY; SUNRISE RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 20 21 22 23 24 25 Defendants. ) Case No.: 12-CV-01998-LKK-EFB ) Civil Rights ) ) [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE ) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ) RELATED DATES BY 45 DAYS ) ) Old Dates ) Last Day for Meeting ) of Counsel: 10/01/2012 ) Status Reports Due: 10/09/2012 ) Scheduling Conference: 10/22/2012 ) ) New Dates ) Last Day for Meeting ) of Counsel: 11/15/2012 ) Status Reports Due: 11/23/2012 ) Scheduling Conference: 12/06/2012 ) 26 27 28 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES BY 45 DAYS Case No. 12-CV-01998-LKK-EFB 1 1 2 Pursuant to Plaintiff’s request, and finding good cause therefore, this Court hereby continues the scheduling conference and related dates by forty-five (45) days. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: 7 8 9 By: HONORABLE LAWRENCE K. KARLTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES BY 45 DAYS Case No. 12-CV-01998-LKK-EFB 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?