Arnold v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 4

CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 10/22/2012 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form, # 2 VDRP Form) (Donati, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NO. 2:12−CV−01998−LKK−EFB 11 CONNIE ARNOLD , 12 Plaintiff(s), 13 ORDER SETTING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE V. 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, ET AL. , 15 Defendant(s). 16 17 / This action has been assigned to the Honorable LAWRENCE K. 18 KARLTON. Pursuant to the provisions of Federal Rule of Civil 19 Procedure 16, as amended December 1, 1993, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 20 that: 21 1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is SET for 22 October 22, 2012 at 11:00 AM , before Judge Karlton in 23 Chambers/Courtroom No. 4. 24 2. In order to enable the court to comply with the 120−day 25 time limit specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b), plaintiff SHALL 26 ///// 1 1 ENDEAVOR TO COMPLETE SERVICE OF PROCESS ON ALL PARTIES WITHIN 2 FORTY−FIVE (45) DAYS OF THE DATE OF FILING THE COMPLAINT HEREIN. 3 3. Concurrently with the service of process, or as soon 4 thereafter as possible, plaintiff shall serve upon each of the 5 parties named in the complaint, and upon all parties 6 subsequently joined, a copy of this order, and shall file with 7 the clerk a certificate reflecting such service. Any party who 8 impleads a third−party defendant shall serve upon that party a copy 9 of this order, and shall file with the clerk a certificate reflecting 10 such service. 11 4. In the event that this action was reassigned to Judge 12 Karlton from another judge, plaintiff shall serve upon all parties 13 to this action a copy of this order, and shall file with the clerk 14 a certificate reflecting such service. 15 5. Any non−governmental corporate party to an action in this 16 court shall file a statement identifying all its parent 17 corporations and listing any publicly held company that owns 10% 18 or more of the party's stock. Defendant shall file the statement 19 with its initial pleading filed in the court and plaintiff shall 20 file the statement not later than fourteen (14) days after filing 21 the complaint. The parties shall supplement the statement within 22 a reasonable time of any change in the information. 23 6. In the event this action was originally filed in a state 24 court and thereafter removed to this court, the removing party or 25 parties shall, immediately following such removal, serve upon 26 each of the other parties and upon all parties subsequently 2 1 joined, a copy of this order, and shall file with the clerk a 2 certificate reflecting such service. 3 7. All parties to the action shall appear at the Status 4 Conference through counsel (or in person, if acting without 5 counsel). UNLESS SPECIFICALLY DIRECTED OTHERWISE, COUNSEL LOCATED 6 OUTSIDE THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO MAY APPEAR BY TELEPHONE, PROVIDED 7 THAT: 8 (a) THE ACTION DOES NOT INVOLVE A LITIGANT APPEARING IN 9 PROPRIA PERSONA. IN SUCH CASES, ALL COUNSEL AND LITIGANTS MUST 10 PERSONALLY APPEAR; and 11 (b) COUNSEL STATE IN THEIR TIMELY−FILED STATUS REPORTS 12 AS REQUIRED BY THIS ORDER THEIR DESIRE TO SO APPEAR, AND THEREIN 13 PROVIDE THE TELEPHONE NUMBER THEY WILL BE CALLING FROM; and 14 (c) PLACE THE CALL TO CHAMBERS THEMSELVES BY CALLING 15 (916) 930−4130, AT EXACTLY THE TIME THE CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED 16 TO BEGIN. IF MORE THAN ONE PARTY DESIRES TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE, 17 COUNSEL MUST MAKE ARRANGEMENTS AMONG THEMSELVES TO SET UP THE 18 CONFERENCE CALL AT THE SCHEDULED TIME WITH ALL PARTICIPANTS ON THE 19 LINE BEFORE CALLING CHAMBERS. A FAILURE TO PLACE THE TELEPHONE 20 CALL AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME WILL BE TREATED AS A FAILURE TO APPEAR 21 AND MAY SUBJECT COUNSEL TO SANCTIONS. 22 8. The parties shall file with the court and serve upon all 23 other parties, pursuant to Local Rule 134(b) (time of filing), 24 fourteen (14) days preceding the conference, a Status Report. 25 ANY PARTY FAILING TO FILE A TIMELY STATUS REPORT PURSUANT TO 26 THIS ORDER MAY BE SUBJECTED TO MONETARY SANCTIONS AND/OR THE 3 1 DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT OR STRIKING OF THE ANSWER. The 2 Status Report shall briefly set out the views of the party 3 making the report on the following matters: 4 (a) Name(s) of the parties counsel represents; 5 (b) A brief summary of the facts alleged in each 6 complaint and characterization of the legal theories under which 7 recovery is sought or liability denied. The characterization of 8 the legal theories does not require legal argument, but only a 9 description of the legal theory (or theories); 10 (c) Progress in the service of process; 11 (d) Possible joinder of additional parties; 12 (e) Any expected or desired amendment of pleadings; 13 (f) Specifying the statutory basis for jurisdiction and venue; 14 (g) Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof; 15 (h) Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof. 16 In this regard, the parties shall discuss whether deferral of 17 discovery pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 26(d) is appropriate, any 18 order affecting discovery pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and 29−37 19 is desired, and whether a discovery conference under Fed. R. Civ. 20 P. 26(f) should be held; 21 (i) Future proceedings, including setting appropriate 22 cut−off dates for discovery, law and motion, and the scheduling of 23 the pretrial conference and trial; 24 (j) Appropriateness of special procedures such as agreement 25 to try the matter before a magistrate judge pursuant to 26 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), or reference to a special master, or to the 4 1 Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, or application of the 2 Manual for Complex Litigation, binding arbitration in Superior 3 Court; 4 (k) Whether any of the parties has timely demanded a 5 trial by jury; 6 (l) Estimate of trial time; 7 (m) Modification of standard pretrial procedures 8 specified by the local rules due to the relative simplicity or 9 complexity of the action; 10 (n) Whether the case is related to any other case, 11 including any matters in bankruptcy; 12 (o) The report of the parties concerning use of the 13 Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program pursuant to Local Rule 271; 14 (p) Any other matters which may be conducive to the 15 just, efficient, and economical determination of the action. 16 Following the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference, the 17 court will issue a written order regarding the future course of 18 this litigation. 19 9. Requests for continuance of Status Conferences are not 20 favored and will not be granted in the absence of a true emergency 21 and, in any event, will not be entertained unless made in writing 22 at least THREE (3) DAYS prior to the scheduled conference. 23 10. At the time of filing a motion, opposition, or reply, 24 counsel are directed to email a copy in word processing format to 25 lkk−pleadings@caed.uscourts.gov. Concurrent with filing any 26 proposed orders in the court's CM/ECF filing system, counsel are 5 1 directed to forward a copy in word processing format to 2 lkkorders@caed.uscourts.gov. 3 11. Counsel are cautioned to refer to Local Rule 230 4 regarding the requirements for noticing such motions on the court's 5 regularly scheduled law and motion calendar. This paragraph does 6 not preclude motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders 7 or other emergency applications. 8 Unless prior permission has been granted, memoranda of law in 9 support of and in opposition to motions are limited to thirty (30) 10 pages, and reply memoranda are limited to fifteen (15) pages. The 11 parties are also cautioned against filing multiple briefs to 12 circumvent this rule. 13 12. Counsel are hereby reminded of their continuing duty to 14 immediately notify the Courtroom Deputy at (916) 930−4133 and the 15 Judge's Chambers in writing, of any settlement or other disposition 16 (Local Rule 160). 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 DATE: 19 20 July 31, 2012 /s/ LAWRENCE K. KARLTON LAWRENCE K. KARLTON SENIOR JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 21 22 23 24 25 26 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?