Arnold v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 43

ORDER re 42 Consent Decree signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/10/2013. The concurrently filed Stipulated Consent Decree for Settlement of plaintiff's Injunctive Relief claims only as to defendant Sunrise Recreation & Park District is ORDERED and shall be binding on plaintiff Connie Arnold and defendant Sunrise Recreation & Park District and any successors in interest.Court shall retain jurisdiction of action to enforce provisions of Consent Decree and Order. Sunrise Recreation & Park District is hereby TERMINATED from action. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Decree, # 2 Attachment A) (Marciel, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

CONNIE ARNOLD

13

Plaintiff,

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

vs.
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO;
SACRAMENTO PUBLIC LIBRARY
AUTHORITY; SUNRISE
RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT;
and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.

) Case No.: 2:12-CV-01998-LKK-EFB
)
Civil Rights
)
) ORDER RE: CONSENT DECREE
) FOR SETTLEMENT OF
) PLAINTIFF’S INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
) CLAIMS ONLY AS TO DEFENDANT
) SUNRISE RECREATION & PARK
) DISTRICT
)
) (Filed concurrently with the Consent
) Decree for Settlement of Plaintiff’s
) Injunctive Relief Claims Only as to
) Defendant Sunrise Recreation & Park
) District)
)
)

24
25
26
27
28

________________________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CONSENT DECREE FOR SETTLEMENT OF PLAINTIFF’S INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF CLAIMS ONLY AS TO DEFENDANT SUNRISE RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT
Case No. 2:12-CV-01998-LKK-EFB
1

ORDER ON CONSENT DECREE

1
2
3
4

Pursuant to the Stipulation of the Parties and for good cause shown, the Court
makes the following orders:
1. The concurrently filed stipulated CONSENT DECREE FOR SETTLEMENT

5

OF PLAINTIFF’S INJUNCTIVE RELIEF CLAIMS ONLY AS TO

6

DEFENDANT SUNRISE RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT is ORDERED

7

and shall be binding on Plaintiff CONNIE ARNOLD and Defendant SUNRISE

8

RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT and any successors in interest.

9
10

2. The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action to enforce provisions of this
Consent Decree and Order.

11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
14
15

Dated: July 10, 2013.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

________________________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CONSENT DECREE FOR SETTLEMENT OF PLAINTIFF’S INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF CLAIMS ONLY AS TO DEFENDANT SUNRISE RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT
Case No. 2:12-CV-01998-LKK-EFB
2