Cooke v. Liles et al

Filing 12

Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re C08-0016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 9/17/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix)(hlk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2010)

Cooke v. Liles et al

Doc. 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. TERRY LILES, MURL HARPHAM, STEVE WATSON, MARVIN KIRKPATRICK, ATF AGENT MEDLIN, ATF SUPERVISOR ANGLIN, THE CITY OF EUREKA, THE EUREKA POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, PAUL GALLEGOS, JIM DAWSON, MIKE HISLOP, THE HUMBOLDT COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, AND DOE DEFENDANTS 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, Defendants. / On February 8, 2010, Plaintiff Alan Anthony Cooke filed a complaint in the above-captioned action alleging claims under Section 1983 and under state law for the wrongful death of Zachary Cooke against Defendants Terry Liles, Murl Harpham, Steve Watson, Marvin Kirkpatrick, ATF Agent Medlin, ATF Supervisor Anglin, the City of Eureka, the County of Humboldt, Paul Gallegos, Jim Dawson, Mike Hislop, the Humboldt County Sheriff's Office, and the Eureka Police Department. Plaintiff filed an earlier action on January 2, 2008, against Defendants Harpum, Liles, Watson, Kirkpatrick, Medlin, Anglin, the City of Eureka, the Eureka Police Department, the County of Humboldt, the Humboldt County Sheriff's Office, Gallegos, Dawson and Hislop as well as the ALAN ANTHONY COOKE, Plaintiff, No. CV 10-696 NJV REFERRAL PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 3-12(c) FOR PURPOSE OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP TO COOKE V. HARPUM, C08-0016 SBA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION NOT FOR CITATION

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

District Attorney of Humboldt County. That earlier-filed action, Cooke v. Harpum, C08-0016 SBA, appears to be related to the above-captioned action. Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 3-3(c) and 312(c), the undersigned refers this case to the Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong to consider whether the cases are related. Any response in opposition to or support of relating Cooke v. Harpum, C08-0016 SBA and Cooke v. Liles, C10-696 NJV must be filed pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(d) and (e).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 17, 2010 NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge

2