Harrison v. Kernan et al

Filing 35

ORDER by Judge Nandor J. Vadas denying 34 Motion to Compel; denying 31 Motion to Compel; denying 33 Motion for Leave to File. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 DAVID SCOTT HARRISON, Case No. 16-cv-07103-NJV Plaintiff, 9 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS TO COMPEL v. 10 11 S. KERNAN, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 31, 33, 34 United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants. 12 13 14 On April 19, 2017, the court entered an order denying Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from 15 Scheduling Order and granting Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery. (Doc. 29.) Pursuant to that 16 order, discovery is stayed in this case pending resolution of the parties' motions for summary 17 judgment. 18 On April 24, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel Defendant Scott Kernan to Respond 19 to Plaintiff's First Set of Discovery Requests, along with a motion to file a fifty-two page 20 memorandum in support of that motion. (Doc. 31, 33.) Also on April 24, 2017, Plaintiff filed a 21 Motion to Compel Defendant Jeffrey Beard to Respond to Plaintiff's First Set of Discovery 22 Requests. (Doc. 34.) Because discovery in this case is stayed pursuant to the court's prior order, 23 Plaintiff's motions are HEREBY DENIED without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reassert his 24 motions after the court rules on the motions for summary judgment. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 27, 2017 ______________________________________ NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?