Moon v. Officer - Pacifica Police Department et al

Filing 9

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 9/8/17. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(njvlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISON 7 8 STEVEN ROBERT MOON, Case No. 17-cv-3067-NJV (PR) Plaintiff, 9 ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. 10 11 PACIFICA POLICA DEPARTMENT, Docket No. 2 United States District Court Northern District of California Defendant. 12 13 14 Plaintiff filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, however he did not 15 pay the filing fee or submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). He was 16 sent three notices that he had not paid the filing fee or applied for leave to proceed IFP and he was 17 allowed twenty-eight days to either pay the fee or file the application. A copy of the court’s form 18 for applications to proceed IFP was provided with the notice, along with a return envelope. 19 The twenty-eight days have passed and no response has been received. This case is 20 therefore DISMISSED without prejudice. The incomplete motion to proceed IFP (Docket No. 2) 21 is DENIED. The clerk shall close the file. To proceed with this case plaintiff must file a brief 22 motion to reopen and a complete IFP application or pay the full filing fee. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 8, 2017 ________________________ NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?