Securities And Exchange Commission v. Amundsen
Filing
81
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION by Hon. William Alsup denying 80 Ex Parte Application.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/16/2017: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service *PLEASE DISREGARD PAGES 2-3) (dl, COURT STAFF). Modified on 5/16/2017 (dl, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
No. C 83-00711 WHA
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
ORDER DENYING MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION
v.
JOSEPH S. AMUNDSEN,
Defendant.
/
17
18
Pro Se defendant Joseph Amundsen has filed another motion to vacate the permanent
19
injunction from his 1983 case. The background of this action is found in prior orders (see, e.g.,
20
Dkt. No. 39). In brief, this action was reassigned from Judge Robert Aguilar to the undersigned
21
judge in 2010. That came after defendant, a then-certified public accountant, had voluntarily
22
signed a consent “Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction” with the SEC, due to defendant’s
23
deficient audit report on a financial statement for Olympic Oil and Gas Company. As a result,
24
the 1983 consent judgment permanently enjoined defendant from “appearing or practicing
25
before the Commission in any way,” among other things (Dkt. No. 3 at 3).
26
On October 19, 2015, the undersigned judge denied defendant’s motion for
27
reconsideration of the denial of a prior petition to vacate the injunction (Dkt. No. 77).
28
Defendant now makes a new request to vacate the injunction now moves for reconsideration of
1
that order, but fails to identify any new basis or facts that would warrant reconsideration of this
2
perennial issue.
3
4
For the same reasons stated in numerous prior orders on similar or identical petitions,
this petition is DENIED.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: May 16, 2017.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?