Dossman v. Newland

Filing 132

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES re 130 , 131 . Petitioner's opposition to motion to dismiss is due 12/4/08. Respondent's optional reply is due 12/24/08. Signed by Judge Susan Illston.(SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2008) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/5/2008: # 1 cs) (ys, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEPHEN DOSSMAN, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY NEWLAND, warden, Respondent. / No. C 00-384 SI (pr) ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES Petitioner has filed two applications for extension of time to file an opposition to respondent's motion to dismiss. Upon due consideration, the court GRANTS the applications and will extend the deadlines. (Docket # 130, # 131.) The court now sets the following new briefing schedule on respondent's motion to dismiss: Petitioner must file and serve his opposition to the motion to dismiss no later than December 5, 2008. No further extensions of this deadline will be permitted. Respondent must file and serve his reply, if any, no later than December 24, 2008. Petitioner filed both a handwritten and a typed application for extension of time, with slightly different texts. Filings by pro se incarcerated litigants need not be typed as long as the handwriting is legible. Petitioner may not file two oppositions, and the court will read only the first one filed. That one opposition brief may not exceed 25 pages in length. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 3, 2008 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?