Allen, et al v. City of Oakland, et al

Filing 975

ORDER approving payment for Compliance Director staff (February 2014) and returning funds to Defendant City of Oakland. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 03/13/14. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit - Anders invoice, # 2 Exhibit - Cashdollar invoice, # 3 Exhibit - Yank invoice) (tehlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2014)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 DELPHINE ALLEN, et al., 6 7 8 MASTER CASE FILE NO. C00-4599 TEH Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., 9 Defendants. ORDER APPROVING PAYMENT FOR COMPLIANCE DIRECTOR STAFF (FEBRUARY 2014) AND RETURNING FUNDS TO DEFENDANT CITY OF OAKLAND 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 The Compliance Director has recommended payment of the attached invoices from 12 Donald Anders, Richard Cashdollar, and Ronald Yank. The Court has reviewed the invoices 13 and supporting documentation and finds that they are reasonable to pay, except for 4.5 hours 14 claimed by Mr. Cashdollar. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall 15 pay $1,395.99 to Donald Anders, $2,325.00 to Richard Cashdollar, and $2,100.00 to Ronald 16 Yank out of the registry for this action. 17 These are the final payments to be made for work performed under the former 18 Compliance Director’s direction. After processing the above disbursements, the Clerk shall 19 return all funds remaining on deposit, including accrued interest, to Defendant City of 20 Oakland. The Court anticipates that the City will continue to pay the Monitor directly for 21 both his monitoring duties and his work under the expanded powers granted by the Court’s 22 February 12, 2014 order but may, if circumstances warrant, renew the City’s obligation to 23 deposit funds into the Court registry. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 Dated: 03/13/14 28 THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?