Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
165
Declaration of Christine P. Sun in Support of 164 Miscellaneous Administrative Request Re Filing of Supplemental Claim Construction Brief and to file Supplemental Claim Construction Brief and Decl. of Ravind S. Grewal in Support under seal; [Proposed Order] filed by Google Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Related document(s) 164 ) (Sun, Christine) (Filed on 5/11/2004)
Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Doc. 165 Att. 1
Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW
Document 165-2
Filed 05/11/2004
Page 1 of 5
PAGES 1 - 121
UNITEP STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE , JUDGE
OVERTURE SERVICES,
INC.,
PLAINTIFF
VS.
GOOGLE
cg (Q) ~
11
NO . C O2 - 1991 JSW
INC.
WEDNESDAY , MARCH 24 , 2004
DEFENDANT.
SAN FRANCISCO , CALIFORNIA
REPORTER I S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
APPEARANCES:
FOR PLAINTI FF
HELLER , EHRMAN , WHITE & MCAULIFFE
BY:
333 BUSH STREET SAN FRANCISCO , CALIFORNIA 94104 ROBERT HASLAM, ESQUIRE ROBERT D. FRAM , ESQUIRE
FOR DEFENDANT
BY:
KEKER & VAN NEST 710 SANSOME STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA DARALYN J. DURIE , ESQUIRE CHRISTINE P. SUN , ESQUIRE
94111
REPORTED BY:
JOAN MARIE COLUMBINI , CSR 5435 OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER.
COMPUTERIZED TRANSCRIPTION BY ECLIPSE
JOAN MARIE COLUMBINI , CSR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
415- 255- 6842
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW
Document 165-2
Filed 05/11/2004
Page 2 of 5
LIST, II AND , THEREFORE, WE'VE GOT TO JAM EVERYTHING IN THERE
THAT WE CAN IN ORDER TO AVOID
IT.
BUT WE HAVE, AS WE SEE,
OTHER ELEMENTS OF THIS CLAIM WHICH ARE GOING TO DISTINGUISH
BANNER ADS.
BUT BEFORE WE GET THERE LET I S LOOK AT WHAT THE
SPECIFICATION SAYS ABOUT BANNER ADS.
THIS IS - AT COLUMN
LINE 16 THROUGH 30.
BANNER ADVERTISING.
IT STARTS WITH THE CURRENT PARADIGMS,
FIRST THING, "TYPICALLY PRICED ON A PER IMPRESSION
BASIS II ; IN OTHER WORDS, IF IT I S SHOWN, YOU PAY FOR IT
REGARDLESS OF WHETHER ANYONE CLICKS THROUGH , VISITS YOU OR
DOES ANYTHING.
IT' S LIKE THE STORE IN THE BACK OF THE MALL
THAT NO ONE EVER GETS BACK TO, BUT YOU I RE PAYING A THOUSAND
DOLLARS A MONTH REGARDLESS OF WHETHER ANYONE COMES IN OR NOT,
AS CONTRASTED WITH WHAT'S CARRIED FORWARD IN THE CLAIMS,
SOMETHING THAT IS MORE AKIN TO A RENT THAT I S BASED ON GROSS
RECEIPTS , SO IF NO ONE COMES IN, YOU DON I T PAY ANY RENT; IF
YOU GET TONS OF BUSINESS, YOU ARE GOING TO PAY MORE.
THAT I S THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN WHAT THEY ARE SAYING
IS WRONG WITH BANNER ADS AND THIS INVENTION.
THE COURT:
ART?
MR. HASLAM
DOES THIS PURPORT TO DESCRIBE THE PRIOR
THIS PURPORTS TO DESCRIBE THE PRIOR
ART , THE PRIOR ART BANNER ADVERTISING, WHICH IT SAYS FOLLOWS
TRADITIONAL ADVERTISING PARADIGMS
AND THEN IT GOES ON TO SAY
JOAN MARIE COLUMBINI , CSR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
415- 255- 6842
M
Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW Document 165-2 Filed 05/11/2004
--
Page 3 of 5
WHAT IT PERCEIVES TO BE THE SHORTCOMINGS OF THAT PRIOR ART
BANNER ADVERTISING, AND GOOGLE SAYS, BANNER ADVERTISING
YOU
MUST AVOID BANNER ADVERTISING BECAUSE THEY DISPARAGE IT , BUT
THEY DISPARAGE IT BECAUSE ONE THING WAS PAID ON A PER
IMPRESSION.
AND THE CLAIMS - - CAN WE PUT UP CLAIM ONE AGAIN,
ERIC?
THE CLAIMS ELSEWHERE HAVE THE DISTINCTION.
THERE'
A BID AMOUNT ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEARCH LISTING.
THE BID
. AMOUNT IS CHARGED UPON RECEIPT OF A RETRIEVAL REQUEST, WHICH
IS SOMETHING THAT IS CLICKED THROUGH.
THE SEARCH RESULT LIST IS ORDERED
R. FRAM WILL
TALK ABOUT THIS
- - IN THIS
CLAIM IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VALUES
OF THE RESPECTIVE BID AMOUNTS, RECEIVING A RETRIEVAL REQUEST.
SO ELSEWHERE IN THE CLAIM WE SEE THE DISTINCTION
BETWEEN THAT ASPECT OF BANNER ADS AND THIS.
WE DON'T NEED TO
CRAM IT INTO II SEARCH RESULT LIST.
WHAT ELSE AT COLUMN 3, LINES 30 THROUGH 41?
THIS
CONTINUES. THE PARAGRAPH WE SAW ABOUT WHAT IS ANOTHER PROBLEM
WITH BANNER ADS, IS THAT PEOPLE ARE PAYING FOR EXPOSURE; IN
OTHER WORDS , IT'S BEING DISPLAYED, AND I' M PAYING FOR IT
BECAUSE IT I S BEING DISPLAYED ON A PAGE WHERE PEOPLE MIGHT NOT
BE INTERESTED, NOT INTERESTED IN WHAT THAT BANNER AD
IS.
PEOPLE MIGHT BE INTERESTED, BUT BECAUSE BANNER ADS WERE
GENERALLY NOT SEARCHABLE, THEY WOULDN'T FIND
IT.
JOAN MARIE COLUMBINI, CSR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
415- 255- 6842
H
Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW Document 165-2 Filed 05/11/2004 Page 4 of 5
INFORMATION DISPERSED ACROSS COUNTLESS INDIVIDUAL
COMPUTER SYSTEMS THAT I S CONSTANTLY CHANGING AND HAS NO
RECOGNIZABLE ORGANIZATION OR MORPHOLOGY.
SO GOOGLE I S TREATISE IS AT WAR WITH GOOGLE I S SPEC
CITE.
ITS TREATISE SAYS , YOU I VE GOT TO HAVE ORGANIZATION;
RANDOM COLLECTION CANNOT BE A DATABASE.
SAY , A-HA , BUT IN THIS PATENT IT CAN BE.
THEY CITE THE SPEC TO
WE WOULD SUBMIT THEY
MISEMPHASIZE THAT FIRST SENTENCE.
DISTRIBUTED DATABASE.
THEY MISS THE WORD ,
II UNIQUE
IT I S NOT A DATABASE AS PEOPLE NORMALLY
THINK OF IT.
WEB.
PERHAPS THIS IS A METAPHORIC STATEMENT ABOUT THE
WE
IT I S A PARTICULAR KIND OF SET OF DATA, BUT IT IS NOT ,
WOULD SUBMIT , LET I S SAY WHAT DATABASE 40 IS , WHEN MR. HASLAM
PUT UP FIGURE I, AND THE WAY A DATABASE IS SUPPOSED TO
OPERATE.
CERTAINLY , AN ACCOUNT DATABASE HAS TO BE SOMETHING
WHERE THE DATA IS ORGANIZED IN RELATIONSHIP TO SOMETHING,
NAMELY AN ACCOUNT.
THE COURT:
SO YOU WOULD ARGUE YOUR DEFINITION OF
DATABASE IS MORE SPECIALIZED DATABASE , IN EFFECT , A RELATIONAL
DATABASE?
MR . FRAM :
AT LEAST ORGANIZED , AND II RELATIONALII WE
BELIEVE IS THE COMMON TERM IN THE ART AS OF THE TIME
AVE TWO ASPECTS, ORGANIZED AND RELATIONAL , IN THE SENSE THAT
THAT IS WHAT IS IN THE ART , THE COMMON SENSE OF
II
DATABASE II
THE ART AS OF THE TIME ONE GETS TO THIS PATENT APPLICATION.
JOAN MARIE COLUMBINI , CSR. OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
415- 255- 6842
Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW
Document 165-2
Filed 05/11/2004
Page 5 of 5
CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER
I, JOAN MARIE COLUMBINI , OFFICIAL REPORTER FOR THE
UNITED STATES COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA , HEREBY
CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING PROCEEDINGS IN C 02- 1991 JSW,
OVERTURE SERVICES. INC. V. GOOGLE INC. , PAGES NUMBERED 1
THROUGH 121, WERE REPORTED BY ME, A CERTIFIED SHORTHAND
REPORTER, AND WERE THEREAFTER TRANSCRIBED UNDER MY DIRECTION
INTO TYPEWRITING; THAT THE FOREGOING IS A FULL, COMPLETE AND
TRUE RECORD OF SAID PROCEEDINGS AT THE TIME OF FILING.
THE INTEGRITY OF THE REPORTER IS
CERTIFICATION OF
SAID TRANSCRIPT MAY BE VOID UPON REMOVAL FROM THE COURT FILE.
JOAN MARIE COLUMBINI, CSR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
415- 255- 6842
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?