Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 165

Declaration of Christine P. Sun in Support of 164 Miscellaneous Administrative Request Re Filing of Supplemental Claim Construction Brief and to file Supplemental Claim Construction Brief and Decl. of Ravind S. Grewal in Support under seal; [Proposed Order] filed by Google Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Related document(s) 164 ) (Sun, Christine) (Filed on 5/11/2004)

Download PDF
Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc. Doc. 165 Att. 1 Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW Document 165-2 Filed 05/11/2004 Page 1 of 5 PAGES 1 - 121 UNITEP STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BEFORE THE HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE , JUDGE OVERTURE SERVICES, INC., PLAINTIFF VS. GOOGLE cg (Q) ~ 11 NO . C O2 - 1991 JSW INC. WEDNESDAY , MARCH 24 , 2004 DEFENDANT. SAN FRANCISCO , CALIFORNIA REPORTER I S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS APPEARANCES: FOR PLAINTI FF HELLER , EHRMAN , WHITE & MCAULIFFE BY: 333 BUSH STREET SAN FRANCISCO , CALIFORNIA 94104 ROBERT HASLAM, ESQUIRE ROBERT D. FRAM , ESQUIRE FOR DEFENDANT BY: KEKER & VAN NEST 710 SANSOME STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA DARALYN J. DURIE , ESQUIRE CHRISTINE P. SUN , ESQUIRE 94111 REPORTED BY: JOAN MARIE COLUMBINI , CSR 5435 OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER. COMPUTERIZED TRANSCRIPTION BY ECLIPSE JOAN MARIE COLUMBINI , CSR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER 415- 255- 6842 Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW Document 165-2 Filed 05/11/2004 Page 2 of 5 LIST, II AND , THEREFORE, WE'VE GOT TO JAM EVERYTHING IN THERE THAT WE CAN IN ORDER TO AVOID IT. BUT WE HAVE, AS WE SEE, OTHER ELEMENTS OF THIS CLAIM WHICH ARE GOING TO DISTINGUISH BANNER ADS. BUT BEFORE WE GET THERE LET I S LOOK AT WHAT THE SPECIFICATION SAYS ABOUT BANNER ADS. THIS IS - AT COLUMN LINE 16 THROUGH 30. BANNER ADVERTISING. IT STARTS WITH THE CURRENT PARADIGMS, FIRST THING, "TYPICALLY PRICED ON A PER IMPRESSION BASIS II ; IN OTHER WORDS, IF IT I S SHOWN, YOU PAY FOR IT REGARDLESS OF WHETHER ANYONE CLICKS THROUGH , VISITS YOU OR DOES ANYTHING. IT' S LIKE THE STORE IN THE BACK OF THE MALL THAT NO ONE EVER GETS BACK TO, BUT YOU I RE PAYING A THOUSAND DOLLARS A MONTH REGARDLESS OF WHETHER ANYONE COMES IN OR NOT, AS CONTRASTED WITH WHAT'S CARRIED FORWARD IN THE CLAIMS, SOMETHING THAT IS MORE AKIN TO A RENT THAT I S BASED ON GROSS RECEIPTS , SO IF NO ONE COMES IN, YOU DON I T PAY ANY RENT; IF YOU GET TONS OF BUSINESS, YOU ARE GOING TO PAY MORE. THAT I S THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN WHAT THEY ARE SAYING IS WRONG WITH BANNER ADS AND THIS INVENTION. THE COURT: ART? MR. HASLAM DOES THIS PURPORT TO DESCRIBE THE PRIOR THIS PURPORTS TO DESCRIBE THE PRIOR ART , THE PRIOR ART BANNER ADVERTISING, WHICH IT SAYS FOLLOWS TRADITIONAL ADVERTISING PARADIGMS AND THEN IT GOES ON TO SAY JOAN MARIE COLUMBINI , CSR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER 415- 255- 6842 M Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW Document 165-2 Filed 05/11/2004 -- Page 3 of 5 WHAT IT PERCEIVES TO BE THE SHORTCOMINGS OF THAT PRIOR ART BANNER ADVERTISING, AND GOOGLE SAYS, BANNER ADVERTISING YOU MUST AVOID BANNER ADVERTISING BECAUSE THEY DISPARAGE IT , BUT THEY DISPARAGE IT BECAUSE ONE THING WAS PAID ON A PER IMPRESSION. AND THE CLAIMS - - CAN WE PUT UP CLAIM ONE AGAIN, ERIC? THE CLAIMS ELSEWHERE HAVE THE DISTINCTION. THERE' A BID AMOUNT ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEARCH LISTING. THE BID . AMOUNT IS CHARGED UPON RECEIPT OF A RETRIEVAL REQUEST, WHICH IS SOMETHING THAT IS CLICKED THROUGH. THE SEARCH RESULT LIST IS ORDERED R. FRAM WILL TALK ABOUT THIS - - IN THIS CLAIM IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VALUES OF THE RESPECTIVE BID AMOUNTS, RECEIVING A RETRIEVAL REQUEST. SO ELSEWHERE IN THE CLAIM WE SEE THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN THAT ASPECT OF BANNER ADS AND THIS. WE DON'T NEED TO CRAM IT INTO II SEARCH RESULT LIST. WHAT ELSE AT COLUMN 3, LINES 30 THROUGH 41? THIS CONTINUES. THE PARAGRAPH WE SAW ABOUT WHAT IS ANOTHER PROBLEM WITH BANNER ADS, IS THAT PEOPLE ARE PAYING FOR EXPOSURE; IN OTHER WORDS , IT'S BEING DISPLAYED, AND I' M PAYING FOR IT BECAUSE IT I S BEING DISPLAYED ON A PAGE WHERE PEOPLE MIGHT NOT BE INTERESTED, NOT INTERESTED IN WHAT THAT BANNER AD IS. PEOPLE MIGHT BE INTERESTED, BUT BECAUSE BANNER ADS WERE GENERALLY NOT SEARCHABLE, THEY WOULDN'T FIND IT. JOAN MARIE COLUMBINI, CSR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER 415- 255- 6842 H Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW Document 165-2 Filed 05/11/2004 Page 4 of 5 INFORMATION DISPERSED ACROSS COUNTLESS INDIVIDUAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS THAT I S CONSTANTLY CHANGING AND HAS NO RECOGNIZABLE ORGANIZATION OR MORPHOLOGY. SO GOOGLE I S TREATISE IS AT WAR WITH GOOGLE I S SPEC CITE. ITS TREATISE SAYS , YOU I VE GOT TO HAVE ORGANIZATION; RANDOM COLLECTION CANNOT BE A DATABASE. SAY , A-HA , BUT IN THIS PATENT IT CAN BE. THEY CITE THE SPEC TO WE WOULD SUBMIT THEY MISEMPHASIZE THAT FIRST SENTENCE. DISTRIBUTED DATABASE. THEY MISS THE WORD , II UNIQUE IT I S NOT A DATABASE AS PEOPLE NORMALLY THINK OF IT. WEB. PERHAPS THIS IS A METAPHORIC STATEMENT ABOUT THE WE IT I S A PARTICULAR KIND OF SET OF DATA, BUT IT IS NOT , WOULD SUBMIT , LET I S SAY WHAT DATABASE 40 IS , WHEN MR. HASLAM PUT UP FIGURE I, AND THE WAY A DATABASE IS SUPPOSED TO OPERATE. CERTAINLY , AN ACCOUNT DATABASE HAS TO BE SOMETHING WHERE THE DATA IS ORGANIZED IN RELATIONSHIP TO SOMETHING, NAMELY AN ACCOUNT. THE COURT: SO YOU WOULD ARGUE YOUR DEFINITION OF DATABASE IS MORE SPECIALIZED DATABASE , IN EFFECT , A RELATIONAL DATABASE? MR . FRAM : AT LEAST ORGANIZED , AND II RELATIONALII WE BELIEVE IS THE COMMON TERM IN THE ART AS OF THE TIME AVE TWO ASPECTS, ORGANIZED AND RELATIONAL , IN THE SENSE THAT THAT IS WHAT IS IN THE ART , THE COMMON SENSE OF II DATABASE II THE ART AS OF THE TIME ONE GETS TO THIS PATENT APPLICATION. JOAN MARIE COLUMBINI , CSR. OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER 415- 255- 6842 Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW Document 165-2 Filed 05/11/2004 Page 5 of 5 CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER I, JOAN MARIE COLUMBINI , OFFICIAL REPORTER FOR THE UNITED STATES COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING PROCEEDINGS IN C 02- 1991 JSW, OVERTURE SERVICES. INC. V. GOOGLE INC. , PAGES NUMBERED 1 THROUGH 121, WERE REPORTED BY ME, A CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTER, AND WERE THEREAFTER TRANSCRIBED UNDER MY DIRECTION INTO TYPEWRITING; THAT THE FOREGOING IS A FULL, COMPLETE AND TRUE RECORD OF SAID PROCEEDINGS AT THE TIME OF FILING. THE INTEGRITY OF THE REPORTER IS CERTIFICATION OF SAID TRANSCRIPT MAY BE VOID UPON REMOVAL FROM THE COURT FILE. JOAN MARIE COLUMBINI, CSR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER 415- 255- 6842

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?