Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 205

Declaration of Ravind S. Grewal in Support of 204 , 195 Reply Re Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Testimony Re Prosecution of '361 Patent filed by Google Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C# 4 Exhibit D# 5 Exhibit E# 6 Exhibit F# 7 Exhibit G)(Related document(s) 204 , 195 ) (Grewal, Ravind) (Filed on 7/30/2004)

Download PDF
Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc. Doc. 205 Att. 2 Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW Document 205-3 Filed 07/30/2004 Page 1 of 5 Exhibit Dockets.Justia.com ~~(,. ,,~\..,, ~"" .' Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW Document 205-3 Filed 07/30/2004 Page 2 of 5 CONFIDENTIAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION OVERTURE SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, vs. GOOGLE INC., a California ) No. C02- 01991 CRB corporation, Defendant. RIGI NAL j~ i~rt~n.f.'\~t\ .; . l r"m ~ ~m~'O ~ CONFIDENTIAL DEPOSITION OF ELAINE K. LEE San Francisco, California Friday, July 18, 2003 Reported by: RACHEL FERRIER CSR No. 6948 Job No. 44.447 Esquire Deposition Services 415. 288.4280 Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW Document 205-3 Filed 07/30/2004 Page 3 of 5 CONFIDENTIAL San Francisco, California; Friday, July 18, 2003 9:13 a. m. 09: 13 09: 13 - 2:27 p. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Good morning. I I m a videographer My name is David Osgood. and notary public employed by Advanced Courtroom Technologies located at 109 Second Street, Sausalito, California 94965. Our phone number is (415) 331- 3326. The court reporter today is Rachel Ferrier of Esquire Deposition Services. 09: 13 Today I S date is July 18th, 2003, and the time on the videotape is 9: 13. Today begins Tape 1, Volume 1, in the deposition of Elaine Lee in the matter of Overture Services, Inc. versus Google Inc., Case No. C02- 01991 JSW, filed in the u. S. District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco 09: 13 Division. This deposition is being taken on behalf of the defense. 09: 14 The location is 710 Sansome Street, San Francisco. Counsel, please voice identify yourselves and state whom you represent. 09: 14 09: 14 09: 14 MS . DURIE: Daralyn Durie representing Google. MS. SUN: Christine Sun representing Google. MR. WHITE: Jason White on behalf of the plaintiff, Overture Services, and also on behalf of the witness, Esquire Deposition Services 415. 288. 4280 Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW Document 205-3 Filed 07/30/2004 Page 4 of 5 CONFIDENTIAL Elaine Lee. 09: 14 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Are there any stipulations for the record? 09: 14 09: 14 MS. DURIE: No. Would the reporter please swear THE VIDEOGRAPHER: in the witness. 09: 14 ELAINE K. LEE, having been first duly sworn to tell the truth, testified as follows: EXAMINATION 09: 14 BY MS. DURIE: Good morning. Good morning. 09: 14 09: 14 09: 14 Ms. Lee, have you ever had your deposition taken before? 09:14 09: 14 No. Okay. Are you generally familiar with the depos i tion procedure? 09: 14 09: 14 Yes, somewhat. Okay. Is there any reason that you can ' t give complete and accurate testimony today? 09: 14 09: 14 Not that I I m aware of. Can you describe for me your educational background, starting after high school. Esquire Deposition Services 415. 288.4280 Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW Document 205-3 Filed 07/30/2004 Page 5 of 5 I, the undersigned, a Certified Shorthand Reporter of the State of California, do hereby certify: That the foregoing proceedings were taken before me at the time and place herein set forth; that any witnesses in the foregoing proceedings, prior to testifying, were placed under oath; that a verbatim record of the proceedings was made by me using machine shorthand which was thereafter transcribed under my direction; further, that the foregoing is an accurate transcription thereof. I further certify that I am neither financially interested in the action nor a relative or employee of any attorney of any of the parties. IN WITNESS HEREOF, I have this date subscribed my- name. Dated: AUG 0 5 2003 RA FERRIER CSR No. 6948

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?