Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
205
Declaration of Ravind S. Grewal in Support of 204 , 195 Reply Re Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Testimony Re Prosecution of '361 Patent filed by Google Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C# 4 Exhibit D# 5 Exhibit E# 6 Exhibit F# 7 Exhibit G)(Related document(s) 204 , 195 ) (Grewal, Ravind) (Filed on 7/30/2004)
Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Doc. 205 Att. 2
Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW
Document 205-3
Filed 07/30/2004
Page 1 of 5
Exhibit
Dockets.Justia.com
~~(,. ,,~\..,, ~""
.'
Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW
Document 205-3
Filed 07/30/2004
Page 2 of 5
CONFIDENTIAL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
OVERTURE SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.
GOOGLE INC., a California
) No. C02- 01991 CRB
corporation,
Defendant.
RIGI NAL
j~ i~rt~n.f.'\~t\ .; .
l r"m ~ ~m~'O ~
CONFIDENTIAL
DEPOSITION OF ELAINE K. LEE
San Francisco, California
Friday, July 18, 2003
Reported by:
RACHEL FERRIER
CSR No. 6948
Job No. 44.447
Esquire Deposition Services
415. 288.4280
Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW
Document 205-3
Filed 07/30/2004
Page 3 of 5
CONFIDENTIAL
San Francisco, California; Friday, July 18, 2003
9:13 a. m.
09: 13
09: 13
- 2:27 p.
THE VIDEOGRAPHER:
Good morning.
I I m a videographer
My name is David Osgood.
and notary public employed by Advanced Courtroom
Technologies located at 109 Second Street, Sausalito,
California 94965.
Our phone number is (415) 331- 3326.
The court reporter today is Rachel Ferrier of Esquire
Deposition Services.
09: 13
Today I S date is July 18th, 2003, and the time
on the videotape is 9: 13.
Today begins Tape 1,
Volume 1, in the deposition of Elaine Lee in the matter
of Overture Services, Inc. versus Google Inc., Case No.
C02- 01991 JSW, filed in the u. S. District Court,
Northern District of California, San Francisco
09: 13
Division.
This deposition is being taken on behalf of the
defense.
09: 14
The location is 710 Sansome
Street,
San Francisco.
Counsel, please voice identify yourselves and
state whom you represent.
09: 14 09: 14 09: 14
MS . DURIE:
Daralyn Durie representing Google.
MS. SUN:
Christine Sun representing Google.
MR. WHITE:
Jason White on behalf of the plaintiff,
Overture Services, and also on behalf of the
witness,
Esquire Deposition Services
415. 288. 4280
Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW
Document 205-3
Filed 07/30/2004
Page 4 of 5
CONFIDENTIAL
Elaine Lee.
09: 14
THE VIDEOGRAPHER:
Are there any stipulations for
the record?
09: 14 09: 14
MS. DURIE:
No.
Would the reporter please swear
THE VIDEOGRAPHER:
in the witness.
09: 14
ELAINE K. LEE,
having been first duly sworn to tell the truth,
testified as follows:
EXAMINATION
09: 14
BY MS. DURIE:
Good morning. Good morning.
09: 14 09: 14 09: 14
Ms. Lee, have you ever had your deposition
taken before?
09:14
09: 14
No.
Okay.
Are you generally familiar with the
depos i tion procedure?
09: 14 09: 14
Yes, somewhat.
Okay.
Is there any reason that you can ' t
give
complete and accurate testimony today?
09: 14 09: 14
Not that I I m aware of.
Can you describe for me your educational
background, starting after high school.
Esquire Deposition Services
415. 288.4280
Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW
Document 205-3
Filed 07/30/2004
Page 5 of 5
I, the undersigned, a Certified Shorthand
Reporter of the State of California, do hereby certify:
That the foregoing proceedings were taken
before me at the time and place herein set forth; that
any witnesses in the foregoing proceedings, prior to
testifying, were placed under oath; that a verbatim
record of the proceedings was made by me using machine shorthand which was thereafter transcribed under my
direction; further, that the foregoing is an accurate
transcription thereof.
I further certify that I am neither financially interested in the action nor a relative or
employee of any attorney of any of the parties.
IN WITNESS HEREOF, I have this date
subscribed my- name.
Dated:
AUG 0 5 2003
RA
FERRIER CSR No. 6948
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?