Willis et al v. City of Oakland et al
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why defendants' summary judgment motion should not be granted. Show Cause Response due by 7/20/2009. (Attachments: # 1 Letter from Dr Scott)(vrwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LILLIE WILLIS and LAVITA OLIVER, PlaintiffS, v CITY OF OAKLAND, a municipal corporation; OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT; RICHARD WORD, in his capacity as Chief of Police for the CITY OF OAKLAND; CITY OF OAKLAND Police Officers FOUGHT and CLEMENT and DOES 6 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. / No C-04-2305 VRW ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
On June 4, 2009, defendants moved for summary judgment on all claims asserted by plaintiffs Lillie Willis and Lavita Oliver. Doc #138. Plaintiffs have not responded to the motion, and the The court is in receipt of a
deadline for doing so has passed.
letter from plaintiff Lavita Oliver's physician, Dr Scott, who indicates that Oliver may wish to terminate this litigation. Attachment #1. See
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Plaintiffs are ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE in writing, not later than July 20, 2009, why defendants' motion should not be granted. Failure to respond to this order will be deemed grounds Plaintiffs should be
to grant defendants' summary judgment motion.
aware that a grant of the motion will foreclose any future claims related to the events involved in the complaint herein.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?