Alexander et al v G.D. Searle LLC et al

Filing 88

ORDER RE: MERLVIN PERKINS. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 9/22/2009. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2009) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/22/2009: # 1 Certificate of Service) (fj, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE BEXTRA AND CELEBREX MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND 12 PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No. MDL 05-01699 CRB ORDER / This document relates to: Merlvin L. Perkins, 05-4781 CRB ____________________________________/ The Court is in receipt of a submission from Plaintiff Merlvin L. Perkins again requesting "a 60 day extension from the September dead-line, to let me have time to get another attorney or see if I can file pro se." As the Court explained in its September 10, 2009 Order, an extension is not necessary. The Court will not dismiss Plaintiff's claim for failure to prosecute at this time, and will communicate with Plaintiff through the contact information included on the last page of Plaintiff's submission. Plaintiff is free to seek additional time from the Special Master in response to any compliance motion filed by Defendant. Plaintiff will also have the opportunity to comply with PTO 31 at any time before the hearing on any motion to dismiss filed by defendant. Plaintiff's request is therefore DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 22, 2009 CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE G:\CRBALL\2005\1699\ordersmisc\orderreperkins.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?