Apple Computer Inc. v. Burst.com, Inc.
Filing
157
Declaration of Nicholas A. Brown in Support of 156 Reply Memorandum filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A part 1# 2 Exhibit A part 2# 3 Exhibit A part 3# 4 Exhibit A part 4# 5 Exhibit A part 5# 6 Exhibit B part 1# 7 Exhibit B part 2# 8 Exhibit B part 3# 9 Exhibit C# 10 Exhibit D# 11 Exhibit E# 12 Exhibit F# 13 Exhibit G# 14 Exhibit H# 15 Exhibit I# 16 Exhibit J# 17 Exhibit K# 18 Exhibit L# 19 Exhibit M# 20 Exhibit N# 21 Exhibit O)(Related document(s) 156 ) (Brown, Nicholas) (Filed on 9/6/2007) Modified on 9/18/2007 (gba, COURT STAFF).
Apple Computer Inc. v. Burst.com, Inc.
Doc. 157
Case 3:06-cv-00019-MHP
Document 157
Filed 09/06/2007
Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
MATTHEW D. POWERS (Bar No. 104795) matthew.powers@weil.com GARLAND T. STEPHENS (admitted N.D.C.A., Texas Bar No. 24053910) garland.stephens@weil.com NICHOLAS A. BROWN (Bar No. 198210) nicholas.brown@weil.com WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP Silicon Valley Office 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 802-3000 Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 Attorneys for Plaintiff APPLE COMPUTER, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
APPLE COMPUTER, INC., Plaintiff, v. BURST.COM, INC., Defendant.
Case No. C 06-0019 MHP DECLARATION OF NICHOLAS A. BROWN IN SUPPORT OF APPLE COMPUTER, INC.'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY Date: September 18, 2007 Time: 2:00 p.m. Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel Complaint Filed: January 4, 2006 Trial Date: February 26, 2008
BROWN DECL. ISO APPLE'S REPLY TO ITS SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY
Case No. C 06-0019 MHP
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:06-cv-00019-MHP
Document 157
Filed 09/06/2007
Page 2 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
I, Nicholas Brown, declare: 1. I am a member of the Bar of this Court and an attorney with the law firm of
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, counsel of record for Apple Computer, Inc. in the above-captioned matter. I submit this declaration based on personal knowledge and following a reasonable investigation. If called upon as a witness, I could competently testify to the truth of each statement herein. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the transcript of
the February 8, 2007 Claim Construction Hearing. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the transcript of
the deposition of Sheila Hemami, taken September 4, 2007. 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of Amsterdam,
Jonathan, "Data Compression with Huffman Coding," Byte Magazine, p. 99 (May 1986) (APBU00665410-00665417). 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of the transcript of
the deposition of Richard Lang, taken July 23, 2003. 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of Gardner, Eriq,
"First Bill, Now Steve", IP Law & Business, p. 36-45 (April 2006). 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
3,786,445, issued to Ho et al. on January 15, 1974. 8. Attached hereto as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of transcript
excerpts from the deposition of Kane Kramer, taken August 7, 2007. 9. Attached hereto as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of Advanceme Inc.
v. RapidPay, LLC, 2007 WL 2350644 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 14, 2007). 10. Attached hereto as Exhibit I is a true and correct copy of Asyst Tech. Inc.,
v. Empak, Inc., 2007 WL 2255220 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 3 2007) (designated as not for citation). 11. Attached hereto as Exhibit J is a true and correct copy of Frazier v. Layne
Christensen Co., 2007 WL 1875909 (Fed. Cir. June 29, 2007) (designated as not for citation) 12. Attached hereto as Exhibit K is a true and correct copy of Friskit Inc., v. 2
Case No. C 06-0019 MHP
KALAY DECL. ISO APPLE'S SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY
Case 3:06-cv-00019-MHP
Document 157
Filed 09/06/2007
Page 3 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
RealNetworks, Inc., 2007 WL 2156239 (N.D. Cal. July 26, 2007) 13. Attached hereto as Exhibit L is a true and correct copy of In re Icon
Health &Fitness, Inc., 2007 WL 2189161 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 1, 2007) 14. Attached hereto as Exhibit M is a true and correct copy of In re Trans
Texas Holdings Corp., 2007 WL 2377009 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 22, 2007) 15. Attached hereto as Exhibit N is a true and correct copy of Semiconductor
Energy Lab. Co. v. Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp., 2007 WL 1793770 (N.D. Cal. June 19, 2007) 16. Attached hereto as Exhibit O is a true and correct copy of transcript
excerpts from the deposition of Earl Mincer, taken July 20, 2007. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 6th day of September, 2007, at Redwood Shores, California. /s/ Nicholas Brown Nicholas A. Brown
KALAY DECL. ISO APPLE'S SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY
3
Case No. C 06-0019 MHP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?