Apple Computer Inc. v. Burst.com, Inc.

Filing 59

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT (JOINT) filed by Apple Computer Inc., Apple Computer Inc., Apple Computer Inc., Apple Computer Inc., Apple Computer Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Agreed Constructions# 2 Exhibit B - '995 Patent# 3 Exhibit C - '839 Patent# 4 Exhibit D - '932 Patent# 5 Exhibit E - '705 Patent)(Brown, Nicholas) (Filed on 10/3/2006)

Download PDF
A pple Computer Inc. v. Burst.com, Inc. Claim Chart for US 5,057,932 CLAIM LANGUAGE 932-4. An audio/video transceiver apparatus comprising: input means for receiving audio/video source information, said audio/video source information comprising a multiplicity of video frames in the form of one or more full motion video programs; BURST'S CLAIM CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: "transceiver apparatus" ­ see `995 claim 1 ­ AGREED PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: INTRINSIC EVIDENCE: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: "audio/video source information": see `839 Patent, Claim 1 "audio/video source information"- See `995 claim 1. see `995 claim 1 EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE: See `995 claim 1. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: "multiplicity" ­ No construction necessary. Alternatively, "a large number." INTRINSIC EVIDENCE: `995 7:67-8:2. EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE: Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary (1981) and American Heritage Dictionary (1982) (definition for multiplicity); expert testimony. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: INTRINSIC EVIDENCE: multiplicity: see `839 Patent, Claim 19 BURST'S EVIDENCE APPLE' CLAIM CONSTRUCTION APPLE'S EVIDENCE "multiplicity of video frames in the See `839 claim 73. form of one or more full motion EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE: video programs" ­ see `839 claim See `839 claim 73. 73. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: INTRINSIC EVIDENCE: video frames: see `839 Patent, Claim 73 full motion video programs: see `839 Patent, Claim 73 "input means for receiving audio/visual source information" INTRINSIC EVIDENCE: `932-11:5312:11; Figs. 2-3 and associated text; Doc. 59 Att. 4 "input means for receiving See '995 claim 1; see also `839 Figs. audio/visual source information" "input means for receiving audio/video source information" ­ 3 & 4, 2:38, 2:52-58, 11:24-28, Limited to structures disclosed under see `995 claim 1 11:48-12:11, 12:25-27, 12:38-45. §112 ¶6: point-to-point microwave 4408-v1/1011.0010 Dockets.Justia.com CLAIM LANGUAGE BURST'S CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BURST'S EVIDENCE EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE: Expert testimony. APPLE' CLAIM CONSTRUCTION transceiver, or satellite transceiver. APPLE'S EVIDENCE `932 FH-APBU 200; 212; 216-17; 231-34 EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE: Burst's claim construction briefing in Burst v. Microsoft; expert testimony; McGraw Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms, 4th ed. (1989). compression means, coupled to said input means, for compressing said audio/video source information into a time compressed representation thereof having an associated time period that is shorter than a time period associated with a real time representation of said audio/video source information; PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: "compression means" ­ see `995 claim 1 INTRINSIC EVIDENCE: See `995 claim 1. EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE: See `995 claim 1. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: time compressed representation: see `839 Patent, Claim 1 "having an associated time period ....": see `839 Patent, Claim 1. For all other terms, see `995 claim 1. compression means...for compressing said audio/video source information...: see `995 Patent, Claim 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: "random access storage means" ­ see `995 claim 1. INTRINSIC EVIDENCE: See `995 claim 1; see also `839 Fig. 4; 6:37-42; 12:23-27. EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE: See `995 claim 1. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: "random access storage means...for storing the time compressed representation... said random access storage means comprising one or magnetic disks" - magnetic disk. "random access storage means...for storing the time compressed representation... said random access storage means comprising one or magnetic disks" INTRINSIC EVIDENCE: `932-6:28-42; Figs. 2-3 and associated text EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE: Burst's claim construction briefing in Burst v. Microsoft; expert testimony; random access storage means, coupled to said compression means, for storing the time compressed representation of said audio/video source information, said random access storage means comprising one or magnetic disks; and 4408-v1/1011.0010 2 CLAIM LANGUAGE BURST'S CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BURST'S EVIDENCE APPLE' CLAIM CONSTRUCTION APPLE'S EVIDENCE McGraw Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms, 4th ed. (1989). output means, coupled to said PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: random access storage means, for "output means" ­ see `995 claim 1 receiving the time compressed audio/video source information stored in said random access storage means for transmission away from said audio/video transceiver apparatus PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: "the time compressed representation of said audio/video source information...for transmission away from said audio/video transceiver apparatus" ­ "sending the time compressed representation to an external device capable of playback, where the representation is sent in a time period that is shorter than the time required for normal playback" INTRINSIC EVIDENCE: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: "output means...for receiving... [and] for transmission away from said audio/video transceiver apparatus" INTRINSIC EVIDENCE: `932-11:5112:11; Figs. 2-3 and associated text; `932 FH-APBU 200; 212; 216-17; 231-34 EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE: Burst's claim construction briefing in Burst v. Microsoft; expert testimony. See `995 claim 1; see also `839 Figs. "output means...for receiving... 3 & 4, 2:38, 2:52-58, 11:24-28, [and] for transmission away from 11:48-12:11, 12:25-27, 12:38-45. said audio/video transceiver apparatus" - Limited to structures EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE: disclosed under §112 ¶6: point-toSee `995 claim 1. point microwave transceiver, or satellite transceiver. INTRINSIC EVIDENCE: See `995 claim 1; see also `839 Figs. 3 & 4, 11:28-32, 11:48-12: 45. EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE: See `995 claim 1. 4408-v1/1011.0010 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?