Hepting et al v. AT&T Corp. et al

Filing 122

MOTION to Intervene filed by United States of America. (Attachments: # 1)(Coppolino, Anthony) (Filed on 5/13/2006)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division CARL J. NICHOLS Deputy Assistant Attorney General DOUGLAS N. LETTER Terrorism Litigation Counsel JOSEPH H. HUNT Director, Federal Programs Branch ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO Special Litigation Counsel tony.coppolino@usdoj.gov ANDREW H. TANNENBAUM andrew.tannenbaum@usdoj.gov Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20001 Phone: (202) 514-4782/(202) 514-4263 Fax: (202) 616-8460/(202) 616-8202/(202) 318-2461 Attorneys for Intervenor Defendant United States of America UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) TASH HEPTING, GREGORY HICKS ) CAROLYN JEWEL, and ERIK KNUTZEN ) on Behalf of Themselves and All Others ) Similarly Situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) v. ) ) ) AT&T CORP., AT&T INC., and ) DOES 1-20, inclusive, ) ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) Case No. C 06-0672-VRW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO INTERVENE BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Judge: The Hon. Vaughn R. Walker Hearing Date: Courtroom: 6, 17th Floor [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO INTERVENE BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Case No. C 06-0672-VRW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: The Court, having considered all arguments of the parties, hereby grants the Motion to Intervene by the United States, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a). The United States is allowed to intervene in this matter as a defendant. IT IS SO ORDERED. Hon. Vaughn R. Walker United States District Judge [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO INTERVENE BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -2Case No. C 06-0672-VRW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?