Hepting et al v. AT&T Corp. et al

Filing 140

MOTION to Shorten Time on Motion to Intervene and Unseal Documents filed by Lycos, Inc., Wired News. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Alger, Timothy) (Filed on 5/23/2006)

Download PDF
Hepting et al v. AT&T Corp. et al Doc. 14 1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Attorneys for Lycos, Inc. and Wired News 9 10 11 12 13 Timothy L. Alger (Bar No. 160303) timalger@quinnemanuel.com Leah J. Russin (Bar No. 225336) leahrussin@quinnemanuel.com 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CASE NO. CV-06-0672-VRW ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR HEARING ON MOTION OF LYCOS, INC. AND WIRED NEWS FOR ORDERS (1) PERMITTING INTERVENTION, AND (2) UNSEALING DOCUMENTS; DECLARATION OF TIMOTHY L. ALGER Complaint Filed: January 31, 2006 TASH HEPTING, GREGORY HICKS, 14 CAROLYN JEWEL and ERIC KNUTZEN on Behalf of Themselves 15 and All Others Similarly Situated, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 09567/1888553.1 Plaintiffs, vs. AT&T CORP., et al., Defendants. Proposed intervenors Lycos, Inc., the owner and operator of Wired News, and Wired News, hereby move this Court, pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11, for an order shortening the time for hearing on their Motion For Orders (1) Permitting Intervention, And (2) Unsealing Documents. Lycos and Wired News request that CASE NO. CV-06-0672-VRW 1 LYCOS & WIRED'S APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME Dockets.Justia.com 1 the Court hear the motion on the earliest date convenient to the Court, but in any 2 event no later than June 23, 2006, the next scheduled hearing date in this litigation. 3 Lycos and Wired News seek intervention for the limited purpose of 4 obtaining an order unsealing the Declaration of Mark Klein and Exhibits A-C, and 5 the Declaration of J. Scott Marcus. In its Order of May 17, 2006, the Court stated 6 that it will entertain motions to intervene only on written application, and with 7 notice, but the Court would consider applications to shorten time. 8 The presumption of access to civil court proceedings, which rests on 9 the First Amendment and common law, requires "immediate and contemporaneous" 10 access. Grove Fresh Distrib., Inc. v. Everfresh Juice Co., 24 F.3d 893, 897 (7th Cir. 11 1994). "To delay or postpone disclosure undermines the benefit of public scrutiny 12 and may have the same result as complete suppression." Id. 13 If the motion to intervene and unseal is heard on a regular noticed 14 schedule, it will be ruled upon after the Court hears the motions to dismiss by 15 Defendants AT&T Corp. and AT&T, Inc. and by the United States Government, a 16 proposed intervenor, on June 23, 2006. In opposition to the AT&T and government 17 motions, plaintiffs intend to argue that they can fully litigate and prevail in this case 18 based, at least in part, on the Klein Declaration, its exhibits, and the Marcus 19 Declaration, which evidently do not implicate state secrets. (See Docket No. 134, at 20 5-7.) The law requires that the public be permitted access to adjudicatory evidence. 21 San Jose Mercury News v. U.S. District Court, 187 F.3d 1096, 1100-02 (9th Cir. 22 1999). Already, as shown by plaintiffs' memorandum filed on May 22, 2006, 23 AT&T's attempt to restrict public knowledge of its activities has forced the litigants 24 to redact discussion of critical facts ­ even where the government has not asserted a 25 claim of privilege. 26 Counsel for plaintiffs does not object to this request to shorten time. 27 Counsel for defendants declined to state defendants' views, but indicated the 28 defendants were likely to oppose the request. 09567/1888553.1 CASE NO. CV-06-0672-VRW 2 LYCOS & WIRED'S APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME 1 The motion to intervene and unseal should be considered at the earliest 2 convenient date, and prior to the hearing on June 23, 2006, so that the public is 3 aware of the facts presented to the Court relating to the motions of the AT&T 4 entities and the government. Certainly, there should be no seal on documents 5 actually considered by the Court. Accordingly, Lycos and Wired News request that 6 the Court shorten time and hear their motion no later than June 23, 2006. 7 8 DATED: May 23, 2006 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 09567/1888553.1 Respectfully submitted, QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP By /s/ Timothy L. Alger Timothy L. Alger Attorneys for Lycos, Inc. & Wired News CASE NO. CV-06-0672-VRW 3 LYCOS & WIRED'S APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME 1 2 3 DECLARATION OF TIMOTHY L. ALGER I, Timothy L. Alger, declare as follows: 1. I am a member of the bar of the State of California and a member 4 of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, attorneys for Lycos, Inc. and 5 Wired News. I make this declaration of personal, firsthand knowledge, and if called 6 and sworn as a witness, I could and would testify competently thereto. 7 2. On May 23, 2006, Lycos and Wired News moved to intervene in 8 this action for the limited purpose of requesting the unsealing of documents, and 9 moved to unseal the Declaration of Mark Klein and Exhibits A-C, and the 10 Declaration of J. Scott Marcus. The regularly noticed hearing date is June 29, 2006, 11 six days after the hearing on the motions by the AT&T entities and the government 12 to dismiss the action. 13 3. I contacted counsel for the parties to determine whether they 14 opposed this administrative motion to shorten time, so the motion to intervene and 15 unseal could be considered prior to, or contemporaneously with, the pending 16 dispositive motions. Counsel for plaintiffs, Lee Tien, stated that plaintiffs did not 17 object. Counsel for defendants, Jacob Sorenson, declined to state defendants' 18 position, and said he would get back to me, but said he anticipated that defendants 19 would oppose the administrative motion. I had not heard back from Mr. Sorenson 20 as of the time of filing of this motion. 21 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of Executed on May 23, 2006, at Los Angeles, California. /s/ Timothy L. Alger Timothy L. Alger 22 America that the foregoing is true and correct. 23 24 25 26 27 28 09567/1888553.1 CASE NO. CV-06-0672-VRW 4 LYCOS & WIRED'S APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?