USA v. Urey
Filing
26
WRIT OF GARNISHMENT issued (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Separate Instructions)(msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2017)
1
2
MICHAEL COSENTINO State Bar No. 83253
Counsel for the United States
P.O. Box 129
Alameda, CA 94501
3
4
5
Telephone: (510) 523-4702
Facsimile: (510) 747-1640
Attorney for Plaintiff
United States of America
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Case No. C06-0875 M MEJ
13
Plaintiff,
v.
14
15
16
GAYE F. UREY
aka FELECIA UREY-GAYE
aka FELECIA K. UREY-GAYE
aka FELECIA KWENDE UREY GAYE,
17
18
19
Defendant,
and
CITY AND COUNTY
OF SAN FRANCISCO,
SEPARATE INSTRUCTIONS
TO GARNISHEE
20
______________________Garnishee. _/
21
22
SEPARATE INSTRUCTIONS TO GARNISHEE
23
TO: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
24
ENCLOSED IS A WRIT OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT REQUESTING
25
THAT YOU DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT YOU HAVE IN YOUR POSSESSION,
26
CUSTODY OR CONTROL ANY OF THE PROPERTY OF THE DEBTOR LISTED
27
THEREIN, OR ANY OTHER PROPERTY OF THE DEBTOR. YOU ARE REQUIRED
28
BY LAW TO SERVE A WRITTEN ANSWER TO THIS WRIT. YOU ARE FURTHER
1
REQUIRED TO WITHHOLD AND RETAIN ANY PROPERTY IN WHICH THE
2
DEBTOR HAS A SUBSTANTIAL NON-EXEMPT INTEREST. A LIST OF
3
EXEMPTIONS WHICH ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE WRIT OF GARNISHMENT IS
4
ATTACHED TO THE CLERK’S NOTICE ENCLOSED WITH THIS PAPER.
5
IF YOU FAIL TO ANSWER THIS WRIT OR TO WITHHOLD PROPERTY IN
6
ACCORDANCE WITH THE WRIT, THE COURT MAY MAKE YOU LIABLE FOR
7
THAT AMOUNT OF THE DEBTOR’S NON-EXEMPT PROPERTY WHICH YOU FAIL
8
TO WITHHOLD. ADDITIONALLY, YOU MAY BE HELD LIABLE FOR A
9
REASONABLE ATTORNEY’S FEE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IF THE
10
UNITED STATES FILES A PETITION TO THE COURT REQUESTING AN
11
EXPLANATION FOR YOUR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS WRIT.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SEPARATE INSTRUCTIONS TO GARNISHEE
C06-0875 M MEJ
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?