USA v. Urey

Filing 26

WRIT OF GARNISHMENT issued (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Separate Instructions)(msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 MICHAEL COSENTINO State Bar No. 83253 Counsel for the United States P.O. Box 129 Alameda, CA 94501 3 4 5 Telephone: (510) 523-4702 Facsimile: (510) 747-1640 Attorney for Plaintiff United States of America 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. C06-0875 M MEJ 13 Plaintiff, v. 14 15 16 GAYE F. UREY aka FELECIA UREY-GAYE aka FELECIA K. UREY-GAYE aka FELECIA KWENDE UREY GAYE, 17 18 19 Defendant, and CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SEPARATE INSTRUCTIONS TO GARNISHEE 20 ______________________Garnishee. _/ 21 22 SEPARATE INSTRUCTIONS TO GARNISHEE 23 TO: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 24 ENCLOSED IS A WRIT OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT REQUESTING 25 THAT YOU DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT YOU HAVE IN YOUR POSSESSION, 26 CUSTODY OR CONTROL ANY OF THE PROPERTY OF THE DEBTOR LISTED 27 THEREIN, OR ANY OTHER PROPERTY OF THE DEBTOR. YOU ARE REQUIRED 28 BY LAW TO SERVE A WRITTEN ANSWER TO THIS WRIT. YOU ARE FURTHER 1 REQUIRED TO WITHHOLD AND RETAIN ANY PROPERTY IN WHICH THE 2 DEBTOR HAS A SUBSTANTIAL NON-EXEMPT INTEREST. A LIST OF 3 EXEMPTIONS WHICH ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE WRIT OF GARNISHMENT IS 4 ATTACHED TO THE CLERK’S NOTICE ENCLOSED WITH THIS PAPER. 5 IF YOU FAIL TO ANSWER THIS WRIT OR TO WITHHOLD PROPERTY IN 6 ACCORDANCE WITH THE WRIT, THE COURT MAY MAKE YOU LIABLE FOR 7 THAT AMOUNT OF THE DEBTOR’S NON-EXEMPT PROPERTY WHICH YOU FAIL 8 TO WITHHOLD. ADDITIONALLY, YOU MAY BE HELD LIABLE FOR A 9 REASONABLE ATTORNEY’S FEE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IF THE 10 UNITED STATES FILES A PETITION TO THE COURT REQUESTING AN 11 EXPLANATION FOR YOUR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS WRIT. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SEPARATE INSTRUCTIONS TO GARNISHEE C06-0875 M MEJ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?