Parrish et al v. National Football League Players Incorporated

Filing 60

Memorandum in Opposition re 29 MOTION for Sanctions Pursuant To Rule 11, 28 U.S.C. 1927, And The Court's Inherent Powers With Accompanying Memorandum Of Points And Authorities filed byBernard Paul Parrish, Walter Roberts, III, Herbert Anthony Adderley. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Hilbert, Ryan) (Filed on 5/10/2007)

Parrish et al v. National Football League Players Incorporated

Doc. 60 Att. 1

Case 3:07-cv-00943-WHA

Document 60-2

Filed 05/10/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW PALO A L T O

MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP RONALD S. KATZ (Bar No. CA 085713) E-mail: [e-mail] RYAN S. HILBERT (California Bar No. 210549) E-mail: [e-mail] NOEL S. COHEN (California Bar No. 219645) E-mail: [e-mail] 1001 Page Mill Road, Building 2 Palo Alto, CA 94304-1006 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiffs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

BERNARD PAUL PARRISH and HERBERT ANTHONY ADDERLEY, and WALTER ROBERTS III, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,

CIVIL ACTION NO. C07 0943 WHA

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Date: Thursday, May 31, 2007 Time: 8:00 am Judge: Honorable William H. Alsup

vs.

NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS INCORPORATED d/b/a PLAYERS INC., a Virginia corporation, Defendant.

The Court, having considered Defendant's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 11, 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and the Court's Inherent Powers ("Motion for Sanctions"), Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Sanction, Defendant's Reply, all other papers filed herein, and the records of the case, hereby orders as follows:

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS CASE NO. C 07-0943 WHA

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 3:07-cv-00943-WHA

Document 60-2

Filed 05/10/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW PALO A L T O

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Sanctions is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ________________, 2007

_______________________________________ Honorable William H. Alsup Judge, United States District Court

41115178.1

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS CASE NO. C 07-0943 WHA