Parrish et al v. National Football League Players Incorporated

Filing 627

Letter from Chad S. Hummel to the Honorable William Alsup. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Hummel, Chad) (Filed on 8/4/2009).

Download PDF
Parrish et al v. National Football League Players Incorporated Doc. 627 Case3:07-cv-00943-WHA Document627 Filed08/04/09 Page1 of 1 Chad S . Hummel Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP Direct Dial: (310) 312-4388 E-mail: chummel@manatt.com manatt August 4, 2009 manatt phelps I phillips Client-Matter : 29749-060 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING The Honorable William Alsup United States District Court, Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 Re: Parrish v National Football League Players Association, et al. Case No. C07-0943 WHA Dear Judge Alsup: This letter is written pursuant to the Court's request during the July 30, 2009 hearing on the Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Settlement Agreement that Class Counsel amend the proposed Notice to the Class to make clear that class members may retain their own counsel to appear at the Settlement Hearing. The amended proposed Notice to the Class is attached as Exhibit "A" and the specific language that has been amended can be fo,.,nd under the heading "Your Legal Rights and Options Under The Settlement." Should the Court need any further information or wish to schedule a further hearing, counsel will make themselves available at the Court's direction. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Respectfully submitted, Is/ Chad S. Hummel Chad S. Hummel Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP Co-Counsel for Plaintiff Class cc: Charles Samel, Esq . (via electronic mail) Lewis T. LeClair, Esq. 41416854.1 Dallas 283190e1Mlll Road, Building 2, Palo Alto, California 94304-1006 Telephone: 650.812.1300 l=ax: 650.213.0260 Albany I Los Angeles I New York Orange County Palo Alto ^ Sacramento I Washington, D.C. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?