Parrish et al v. National Football League Players Incorporated

Filing 658

Declaration of Ronald S. Katz in Support of 657 Response ( Non Motion ) filed byHerbert Anthony Adderley. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(Related document(s) 657 ) (Katz, Ronald) (Filed on 11/5/2009)

Download PDF
Parrish et al v. National Football League Players Incorporated Doc. 658 Case3:07-cv-00943-WHA Document658 Filed11/05/09 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP RONALD S. KATZ (Bar No. CA 085713) E-mail: rkatz@manatt.com RYAN S. HILBERT (California Bar No. 210549) E-mail: rhilbert@manatt.com NOEL S. COHEN (California Bar No. 219645) E-mail: ncohen@manatt.com 1001 Page Mill Road, Building 2 Palo Alto, CA 94304-1006 Telephone: (650) 812-1300 Facsimile: (650) 213-0260 MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. LEWIS T. LECLAIR (Bar No. CA 077136) E-mail: lleclair@mckoolsmith.com JILL ADLER NAYLOR (Bar No. CA 150783) E-mail: jnaylor@mckoolsmith.com 300 Crescent Court Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone: (214) 978-4984 Facsimile: (214) 978-4044 Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION HERBERT ANTHONY ADDERLEY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS ASSOCIATION, a Virginia corporation, and NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS INCORPORATED d/b/a PLAYERS INC., a Virginia corporation, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. C07 0943 WHA DECLARATION OF RONALD S. KATZ IN SUPPORT OF CLASS COUNSELS' RESPONSE TO OBJECTIONS AND CLASS COUNSELS' OBJECTION TO PARTICIPATION BY NON-CLASS MEMBERS IN ANY PHASE OF THE SETTLEMENT PROCEEDINGS Date: Thursday, November 19, 2009 Time: 2:00 p.m. Judge: Honorable William H. Alsup Place: Courtroom 9, 19th Floor 25 26 27 28 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW PA L O A L T O 300014888.1 1 KATZ DECL. ISO CLASS COUNSELS' RESPONSE RE OBJECTIONS CASE NO. C 07-0943 WHA Dockets.Justia.com Case3:07-cv-00943-WHA Document658 Filed11/05/09 Page2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW PA L O A L T O I, Ronald S. Katz, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney duly licensed to practice law before the Courts of the State of California and am a counsel of record in this matter. I am a partner with the law firm of Manatt, Phelps and Phillips, LLP ("Manatt"), and I represented plaintiff Herbert Anthony Adderley and the certified class in this action from its onset. I am submitting this Declaration in support of Class Counsels' Response to Objections and Class Counsels' Objection to Participation by NonClass Members in any Phase of the Settlement Proceedings. The following declaration is based upon my personal knowledge. If called as a witness I could and would competently testify to the facts set forth herein. 2. Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the form letter Mr. Parrish made available for download on the Internet as early as September 20, 2009. 3. Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the Report of the Third Circuit Task Force regarding the percentage of the fund approach. 4. Attached as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of the draft settlement agreement Class Counsel submitted to the Court on July 13, 2009. 5. Attached as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of the amicus brief that Manatt, Phelps & Phillips submitted on behalf of Herb Adderley and James "Jim" Brown in the matter of Keller v. Electronic Arts, Inc., Case No. CV-09-1967 CW (N.D. Cal. 2009). I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signed this 5th day of November, 2009, at Palo Alto, California. ___/s/ Ronald S. Katz_________________ Ronald S. Katz 300014888.1 2 KATZ DECL. ISO CLASS COUNSELS' RESPONSE TO OBJECTIONS CASE NO. C 07-0943 WHA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?