Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al
Filing
1022
Declaration of Tharan Gregory Lanier in Support of 1021 Response filed by SAP AG, SAP America Inc, Tomorrownow Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21)(Related document(s) 1021 ) (Froyd, Jane) (Filed on 12/23/2010) Modified on 12/27/2010 (kc, COURT STAFF).
Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al
Doc. 1022 Att. 3
EXHIBIT 3
Dockets.Justia.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CERTIFIED COPY
BEFORE THE HONORABLE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, JUDGE ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) VS. ) ) SAP AG, ET AL., ) ) DEFENDANTS. ) ____________________________) ORACLE CORPORATION, ET AL. JURY TRIAL NO. C 07-01658 PJH VOLUME 5 PAGES 754 - 946 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA MONDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2010
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
APPEARANCES: FOR PLAINTIFFS: BY: BINGHAM MUCCUTCHEN LLP THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-4607 ZACHARY J. ALINDER, HOLLY A. HOUSE, GEOFFREY M. HOWARD, DONN P. PICKETT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 900 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612 DAVID BOIES, STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW
BY:
(APPEARANCES CONTINUED NEXT PAGE)
REPORTED BY:
RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR NO. 8258 DIANE E. SKILLMAN, CSR NO. 4909
RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR, CCRR (510) 451-7530
856 CATZ - DIRECT / MS. HOUSE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 INCREMENTAL CUSTOMER IS CLOSER TO A HUNDRED PERCENT. Q. A. WHAT DOES ORACLE THEN DO WITH THOSE MAINTENANCE PROFITS? THIS IS WHAT WE SPEND ON EITHER PUTTING THE MONEY INTO R&D AND THAT'S WHAT OUR ACQUISITIONS ARE FUNDED
OR ACQUIRING R&D.
WITH, QUITE FRANKLY, ADDITIONAL R&D. Q. A. AND DOES THAT R&D HAVE ANY IMPACT IN TERMS OF JOBS? OH, YEAH. I MEAN, WE HAVE, AS YOU HEARD, WE HAVE A WE HAD WHAT, 50,000
HUNDRED THOUSAND EMPLOYEES AT THAT TIME. AND SO IT IS A LOT OF JOBS, OF COURSE. Q.
IS ORACLE THE ONLY COMPANY IN THE SOFTWARE BUSINESS THAT
EARNS HIGH SUPPORT MARGINS AND THEN TURNS AROUND TO FUND R&D WITH THOSE? A. NO, THAT IS ACTUALLY THE MODEL. THAT'S WHAT IBM AND SAP,
THAT'S WHAT WE ALL DO. Q.
THIS IS HOW YOU DO IT.
NOW LOOKING AT THE NEXT PAGE IN THE MODEL, YOU -- IT SAYS
IN THE SECOND HALF ON THE BOTTOM IT SAYS, "OPERATING EXPENSE BUILDUP". AND THE FIRST LINE OF DATA SHOWN UNDERNEATH SAYS
"R&D COSTS". CAN YOU EXPLAIN TO THE JURY WHAT IS INCLUDED IN THAT LINE ITEM ON THE LEFT-HAND SIDE? A. SO, R&D COSTS ARE THE DEVELOPERS WHO ACTUALLY BUILD THE
SOFTWARE AND BUILD ALL THE FIXES AND DO THE SECURITY FIXES AND THE REGULATORY UPDATES. BUT THESE ARE THE GUYS, GUYS AND GALS, AND AS YOU CAN SEE,
ACTUALLY, THAT BUILD THE PRODUCTS.
PEOPLESOFT WAS SPENDING A LITTLE MORE THAN 500 MILLION A YEAR
DIANE E. SKILLMAN, OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER, USDC (510) 451-2930
946
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 2010 ___________________________________ DIANE E. SKILLMAN, CSR, RPR, FCRR ___________________________________ RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR, CCRR CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER WE, RAYNEE H. MERCADO AND DIANE E. SKILLMAN, OFFICIAL REPORTERS FOR THE UNITED STATES COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING PROCEEDINGS IN C07-01658PJH, ORACLE USA, INC., ET AL. V. SAP AG, ET AL., WERE REPORTED BY US ON, MONDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2010, CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTERS, AND WERE THEREAFTER TRANSCRIBED UNDER OUR DIRECTION INTO TYPEWRITING; THAT THE FOREGOING IS A FULL, COMPLETE AND TRUE RECORD OF SAID PROCEEDINGS AS BOUND BY US AT THE TIME OF FILING. THE VALIDITY OF THE REPORTER'S CERTIFICATION OF SAID TRANSCRIPT MAY BE VOID UPON DISASSEMBLY AND/OR REMOVAL FROM THE COURT FILE.
/s/
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?