Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al
Filing
1056
Declaration of Tharan Gregory Lanier in Support of 1055 Opposition/Response to Motion, Defendants' Opposition to Oracle's Conditional Motion for New Trial filed bySAP AG, SAP America Inc, Tomorrownow Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Related document(s) 1055 ) (McDonell, Jason) (Filed on 4/8/2011)
Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al
Doc. 1056 Att. 1
Exhibit A
Dockets.Justia.com
UNITED NORTHERN BEFORE THE HONORABLE
STATES
DISTRICT
COURT
DISTRICT
OF CALIFORNIA JUDGE
PHYLLIS
ET
HAMILTON
ORACLE CORPORATION
AL NO
0701658
PJH
PLAINTIFFS
VS
SAP
Certified
ET
Copy
AG
AL
DEFENDANTS
PAGES
124
_____________________________
CALIFORNIA OAKLAND WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER
30
2010
TRANSCRIPT
OF PROCEEDINGS
APPEARANCES
FOR
PLAINTIFFS
BOlES
1999
SCHILLER
OAKLAND
HARRISON CALIFORNIA
FLEXNER LLP STREET SUITE 900
94612 ATTORNEY LLP CENTER 94111-4607 AT LAW
BY
STEVEN
HOLTZMAN
BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN THREE EMBARCADERO
BY
SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA ZACHARY ALINDER ANTHONY FALZONE HOLLY HOUSE GEOFFREY HOWARD DONN PICKETT ATTORNEYS
AT
LAW
FOR
DEFENDANTS
JONES
DAY
SILICON VALLEY OFFICE 1755 EMBARCADERO ROAD PALO ALTO CALIFORNIA
BY
THARAN
GREGORY
LANIER
94303 ATTORNEY
AT
LAW
APPEARANCES CONTINUED
REPORTED
NEXT CSR
PAGE
BY
RAYNEE
MERCADO
NO
8258
RA YNEE
MERCADO CSR RMR CRR FCRR CCRR 510
451-7530
55 -- LOOK TO
PEOPLESOFT
AND VALUE
AND
SIEBEL
BY
ANALOGY
AT
THAT
TOTAL
VALUE
WAS
EVERYTHING
THATS RELEVANT
THE
SOFTWARE
THAT
STOLEN
ITS
NOT
NOT
IT DO
ABOUT
IS
--
ITS
THE
NOT FAIR
ABOUT MARKET
LOST
PROFITS
OF
ITS
WHAT
ABOUT
THE
-TO
ABOUT
VALUE
USE
AT
THE
THEYRE
VERY
TRYING THEY
DOES
IS
EXPAND
THIS
PRIOR
ORDER
WHEN
TIME
IT
MADE NOT
THIS EXTEND
-- THEY TO
SOUGHT
THIS
ORDER
THEY
SAID
QUOTE THEORY
10
ORACLES HYPOTHETICAL
LICENSE
CLOSED NOW
QUOTE THEYRE
AND TRYING
IT DOES TO
TAKE
BACK WHAT
TO
THEY
SAID
TO
11
JUDGE LAPORTE LICENSE
SAY
EXTEND
ORACLES HYPOTHETICAL
MOTION
IS
12
THEORY
THE
THATS EXACTLY WHAT COURT
THE
THIS
ABOUT ASK
WAS
THE
13
CAN THAT
TO
JUST THIS
THE
ASK -- CAN PARTICULAR
JUST
14
ISSUE LOST
RAISED PROFITS
AT WAS
TIME
EVIDENCE
AS TO
15
RELEVANT
HYPOTHETICAL THEY VALUE SAID
LICENSE ANALYSIS
IT
16
17
MR PICKETT
DO
NO
FAIR HAD
BECAUSE MARKET EXPERT
HAD
NOTHING
TO
WITH
THE
HYPOTHETICAL THE
APPROACH
ALREADY BEEN
18
COURT
THE
REPORTS
19 20 21 22 23
24
PREPARED
--
MR
THE
PICKETT
NO
-- YOUR
COURT
PICKETT
EXPERT
WERE BUT
DONE TO DO
NO
PREPARED MONTHS
MR
THEY ARE
NO
THOSE
LATER
BOTH
-- STARTED
LAST
NOVEMBER
AND
IS
THATS AN ISSUE THAT
LOTS OF DISCOVERY
IS CUT
EXPERTS
HAVE
SO
LOOKED WHAT
AT
THIS
WEVE
TRYING
OVER
--
25
SIGNIFICANT
FAYNEE
MERCADO CSR RMR CRR FCRR CCRR 510
451-7530
124
CERTIFICATE RAYNEE STATES
THAT
OF REPORTER OFFICIAL
OF IN ET
MERCADO
DISTRICT
REPORTER
FOR
THE
UNITED
COURT
NORTHERN
CALIFORNIA C07-01658
HEREBY
CERTIFY
THE
FOREGOING
ET
PROCEEDINGS
SAP
PJH
ORACLE
BY
CORPORATION CERTIFIED UNDER
10
AL
AG
AL
WERE
WERE
REPORTED
ME
SHORTHAND DIRECTION AND
OF
REPORTER
INTO TRUE
AND
THEREAFTER
THE
TRANSCRIBED
IS
MY
TYPEWRITING RECORD
OF
THAT
FOREGOING
AS
FULL
ME AT
COMPLETE
THE TIME THE
SAID
PROCEEDINGS
BOUND
BY
11
FILING
OF THE
12
VALIDITY
BE
REPORTERS
CERTIFICATION AND/OR REMOVAL
OF
SAID THE
13
TRANSCRIPT COURT
MAY
VOID
UPON
DISASSEMBLY
FROM
14
FILE
15
16
17
RAYNEE
MERCADO MONDAY
CSR
RMR
CRR
2010
FCRR
CCRR
18
OCTOBER
19
20
21 22 23
24
25
RAYNEE
MERCADO CSR RMR CRR FCRR CCRR 510
451-7530
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?