Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 1070

MOTION Approval of Security Pursuant to FRCP 62 Defendants' Motion For Approval of Security Pursuant to Rule 62 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by SAP AG, SAP America Inc, Tomorrownow Inc. Motion Hearing set for 6/29/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Froyd, Jane) (Filed on 5/20/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 060359)
Jason McDonell (SBN 115084)
Elaine Wallace (SBN 197882)
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Tharan Gregory Lanier (SBN 138784)
Jane L. Froyd (SBN 220776)
JONES DAY
1755 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Scott W. Cowan (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Joshua L. Fuchs (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
JONES DAY
717 Texas, Suite 3300
Houston, TX 77002
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
SAP AG, SAP AMERICA, INC., and
TOMORROWNOW, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

19
20
21

ORACLE USA, INC., et al.,

22

Plaintiffs,

23

v.

24

SAP AG, et al.,

25

Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
APPROVAL OF SECURITY
PURSUANT TO RULE 62 OF THE
FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE

Defendants.
Date:
June 29, 2011
Time:
9:00 a.m.
Courtroom: 3, 3rd Floor
Judge:
Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton

26
27
28
SVI-93146v1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR APPROVAL OF SECURITY
Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)

1

Having considered Defendants’ Motion for Approval of Security Pursuant to Rule 62 of

2

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Motion”), the Declaration of Jane L. Froyd in Support of

3

the Motion (“Froyd Declaration”), and exhibits thereto:

4

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. The

5

supersedeas bond attached as Exhibit 1 to the Froyd Declaration is approved and, as set forth in

6

the Court’s April 29, 2011 Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Stay of Execution of

7

Judgment Through Appeal and Approval of Proposed Security Pursuant to FRCP 62 (ECF No.

8

1069), execution of final judgment is stayed pending disposition of post-judgment motions and, if

9

necessary, appeal.

10
11
12
13
14
15

DATED: ________________________

By:
Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SVI-93146v1

-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
STIPULATED MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF SECURITY
Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)