Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 1074

STIPULATION re 1070 MOTION Approval of Security Pursuant to FRCP 62 Defendants' Motion For Approval of Security Pursuant to Rule 62 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Defendants' Motion for Approval of Security by SAP AG, SAP America Inc, Tomorrownow Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Lee, Jacqueline) (Filed on 6/8/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 060359)
Jason McDonell (SBN 115084)
Elaine Wallace (SBN 197882)
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Tharan Gregory Lanier (SBN 138784)
Jane L. Froyd (SBN 220776)
JONES DAY
1755 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Scott W. Cowan (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Joshua L. Fuchs (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
JONES DAY
717 Texas, Suite 3300
Houston, TX 77002
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
SAP AG, SAP AMERICA, INC., and
TOMORROWNOW, INC.

19
20

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP
DONN P. PICKETT (SBN 72257)
GEOFFREY M. HOWARD (SBN 157468)
HOLLY A. HOUSE (SBN 136045)
ZACHARY J. ALINDER (SBN 209009)
BREE HANN (SBN 215695)
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111-4067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
333 Main Street
Armonk, NY 10504
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (SBN 144177)
FRED NORTON (SBN 224725)
1999 Harrison St., Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
DORIAN DALEY (SBN 129049)
JENNIFER GLOSS (SBN 154227)
500 Oracle Parkway, M/S 5op7
Redwood City, CA 94070
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Oracle USA, Inc., et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

21
22
23

ORACLE USA, INC., et al.,

24

Plaintiffs,

25

v.

26

SAP AG, et al.,

27

Defendants.

28

Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
APPROVAL OF SECURITY
Date:
June 29, 2011
Time:
9:00 a.m.
Courtroom: 3, 3rd Floor
Judge:
Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

SVI-94026v1

FOR APPROVAL OF SECURITY
Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)

1
2

STIPULATION RE MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF SECURITY
Defendants SAP AG, SAP America, Inc., and TomorrowNow, Inc. (“Defendants”) and

3

Oracle USA, Inc., Oracle International Corporation and Siebel Systems, Inc. (“Oracle,” and

4

together with Defendants, the “Parties”) request entry of an order approving a supersedeas bond

5

in the amount of $1,325,033,547.00 as appropriate security to stay execution of the final

6

judgment entered on February 3, 2011 (ECF No. 1036), pending disposition of post-judgment

7

motions and, if necessary, appeal. Defendants reviewed the revisions proposed by Oracle as

8

further explained in its Opposition (ECF No. 1072) and have had an opportunity to confer with

9

the sureties insuring the bond regarding Oracle’s suggested revisions. Defendants have now

10

accepted the revisions proposed by Oracle and proposed one minor addition. The Parties met and

11

conferred further, and with these revisions, have reached an agreement on a stipulated bond form,

12

which is attached as Exhibit A. Accordingly, the Parties jointly request that the Court approve

13

this revised bond form and grant Defendants 10 business days to obtain the necessary signatures

14

and file a signed version of this bond form with the Court for final approval. A hearing on the

15

Defendants’ Motion is no longer required.

16
17
18

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: June 8, 2011

JONES DAY

19
20

By: /s/ Tharan Gregory Lanier
Tharan Gregory Lanier

21

Counsel for Defendants
SAP AG, SAP AMERICA, INC., and
TOMORROWNOW, INC.

22
23
24
25

In accordance with General Order No. 45, Rule X, the above signatory attests that
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below.

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
SVI-94026v1

-1-

FOR APPROVAL OF SECURITY
Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)

1

Dated: June 8, 2011

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP

2
3

By:

4

/s/ Geoffrey M. Howard
Geoffrey M. Howard

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ORACLE USA, INC., ORACLE
INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, and
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, INC.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
SVI-94026v1

-2-

FOR APPROVAL OF SECURITY
Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3
4
5
6

DATED: ________________________

By:
Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton
United States District Court Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
SVI-94026v1

-3-

FOR APPROVAL OF SECURITY
Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH