Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 1086

MOTION to Stay filed by Oracle International Corporation, Oracle USA Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 1/11/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton. Responses due by 9/27/2011. Replies due by 10/4/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Howard, Geoffrey) (Filed on 9/13/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

INGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
DONN P. PICKETT (SBN 72257)
GEOFFREY M. HOWARD (SBN 157468)
HOLLY A. HOUSE (SBN 136045)
ZACHARY J. ALINDER (SBN 209009)
BREE HANN (SBN 215695)
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111-4067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.393.2286
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
333 Main Street
Armonk, NY 10504
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (SBN 144177)
FRED NORTON (SBN 224725)
1999 Harrison St., Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
DORIAN DALEY (SBN 129049)
JENNIFER GLOSS (SBN 154227)
500 Oracle Parkway, M/S 5op7
Redwood City, CA 94070
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.506.7144
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc., et al.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

22
23
24

ORACLE USA, INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,

25

v.

26

No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
ORACLE’S MOTION FOR STAY

SAP AG, et al.,

27

Defendants.

28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ORACLE’S MOTION FOR STAY, CASE NO. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)

1

Before the Court is the Motion for Stay (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiffs Oracle

2

USA, Inc. and Oracle International Corporation (“Oracle”). After considering the pleadings,

3

memoranda, and supporting papers submitted by the Parties, and having heard the arguments of

4

counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Oracle’s Motion is GRANTED.

5

All proceedings in this Court (other than Oracle’s certification motion) are stayed

6

and the time for Oracle to accept or reject the remittitur pursuant to the Post-Trial Order is

7

extended until 10 days after final disposition of Oracle’s 1292(b) application and any subsequent

8

appellate proceedings.

9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12
13

DATED: _______________, 2011
Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton
United States District Court Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ORACLE’S MOTION FOR STAY, CASE NO. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)